WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care - Safe Care ...
WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care - Safe Care ...
WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care - Safe Care ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>WHO</str<strong>on</strong>g> GUIDELINES ON HAND HYGIENE IN HEALTH CARE<br />
22.<br />
Impact of improved hand hygiene<br />
Evaluati<strong>on</strong> of the effectiveness of hand hygiene guidel<strong>in</strong>es or recommendati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> the ultimate outcome, i.e. the<br />
HCAI rate, is certa<strong>in</strong>ly the most accurate way to measure the impact of improved hand hygiene, but it represents<br />
a very challeng<strong>in</strong>g activity. Indeed, guidel<strong>in</strong>e implementati<strong>on</strong> should not be evaluated per se but <strong>in</strong> relati<strong>on</strong> to the<br />
availability of clear <strong>in</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> how to translate it <strong>in</strong>to practice and, ideally, the existence of related tools and<br />
impact of their implementati<strong>on</strong>. As an illustrati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>in</strong> a sample of 40 hospitals <strong>in</strong> the USA, Lars<strong>on</strong> and colleagues<br />
found that although most HCWs were aware of the hand hygiene guidel<strong>in</strong>es with alcohol-based handrub available<br />
<strong>in</strong> all facilities, a multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary implementati<strong>on</strong> programme was c<strong>on</strong>ducted <strong>in</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly 44.2% of the hospitals. 728<br />
The impact was quite disappo<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g: mean hand hygiene compliance rates were no higher than 56.6%, and the<br />
correlati<strong>on</strong> of lower <strong>in</strong>fecti<strong>on</strong> rates with higher compliance was dem<strong>on</strong>strated <strong>on</strong>ly for bloodstream <strong>in</strong>fecti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
The authors c<strong>on</strong>cluded that a real change follow<strong>in</strong>g guidel<strong>in</strong>e dissem<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> is not achievable unless fostered by<br />
factual multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary efforts and explicit adm<strong>in</strong>istrative support.<br />
Difficulties to deal with this challengig issue depend firstly <strong>on</strong> the<br />
diversity of methodologies used <strong>in</strong> available studies, and this is<br />
well reflected <strong>in</strong> the very different c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s that can be drawn<br />
from systematic reviews <strong>on</strong> the topic. 887,888<br />
The lack of scientific <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the def<strong>in</strong>itive impact of<br />
improved hand hygiene compliance <strong>on</strong> HCAI rates has been<br />
reported as a possible barrier to appropriate adherence<br />
with hand hygiene recommendati<strong>on</strong>s. However, there is<br />
c<strong>on</strong>v<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g evidence that improved hand hygiene through<br />
multimodal implementati<strong>on</strong> strategies can reduce <strong>in</strong>fecti<strong>on</strong><br />
rates. In additi<strong>on</strong>, although not report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fecti<strong>on</strong> rates, several<br />
studies showed a susta<strong>in</strong>ed decrease of the <strong>in</strong>cidence of<br />
multidrug-resistant bacterial isolates and patient col<strong>on</strong>izati<strong>on</strong><br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g the implementati<strong>on</strong> of hand hygiene improvement<br />
strategies. 428,655,687,701 Failure to perform appropriate hand<br />
hygiene is c<strong>on</strong>sidered the lead<strong>in</strong>g cause of HCAI and spread<br />
of multi-resistant organisms, and has been recognized as a<br />
significant c<strong>on</strong>tributor to outbreaks.<br />
At least 20 hospital-based studies of the impact of hand hygiene<br />
<strong>on</strong> the risk of HCAI have been published between 1977 and<br />
June 2008 (Table I.22.1). 60,61,121,181,182,195,196,489,494,645,657,659,663,667,713-<br />
718,852<br />
Despite study limitati<strong>on</strong>s, most reports showed a temporal<br />
relati<strong>on</strong> between improved hand hygiene practices and reduced<br />
<strong>in</strong>fecti<strong>on</strong> and cross-transmissi<strong>on</strong> rates.<br />
Maki 195 found that HCAI rates were lower when antiseptic<br />
handwash was used by HCWs. Doebbel<strong>in</strong>g and colleagues 659<br />
compared hand antisepsis us<strong>in</strong>g a chlorhexid<strong>in</strong>e-c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
detergent to a comb<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> regimen that permitted either<br />
handwash<strong>in</strong>g with pla<strong>in</strong> soap or use of an alcohol-based<br />
handrub. HCAI rates were lower when the chlorhexid<strong>in</strong>ec<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
product was <strong>in</strong> use. However, because relatively<br />
little of the alcohol rub was used dur<strong>in</strong>g periods when the<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> regimen was <strong>in</strong> operati<strong>on</strong> and because adherence<br />
to policies was higher when chlorhexid<strong>in</strong>e was available, it<br />
was difficult to determ<strong>in</strong>e whether the lower <strong>in</strong>fecti<strong>on</strong> rates<br />
were attributable to the hand hygiene regimen used or to the<br />
differences <strong>in</strong> HCW compliance with policies.<br />
A study by Lars<strong>on</strong> and colleagues 713 found that the frequency<br />
of VRE <strong>in</strong>fecti<strong>on</strong>s, but not MRSA, decreased as adherence of<br />
HCWs to recommended handwash<strong>in</strong>g measures improved.<br />
This strategy yielded susta<strong>in</strong>ed improvements <strong>in</strong> hand hygiene<br />
practices. The <strong>in</strong>terventi<strong>on</strong> lasted eight m<strong>on</strong>ths, and a followup<br />
survey six m<strong>on</strong>ths after the end of the <strong>in</strong>terventi<strong>on</strong> showed<br />
a susta<strong>in</strong>ed improvement <strong>in</strong> hand hygiene practices. More<br />
recently, several studies dem<strong>on</strong>strated a clear impact of<br />
improved hand hygiene <strong>on</strong> MRSA rates. 489,494,718 In a district<br />
hospital <strong>in</strong> the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom, the <strong>in</strong>cidence of hospitalacquired<br />
MRSA cases significantly decreased after a successful<br />
hand hygiene promoti<strong>on</strong> programme. 489 Similarly, <strong>in</strong> Australia,<br />
a hospitalwide, multifaceted programme to change hand<br />
hygiene culture and practices led to a 57% reducti<strong>on</strong> of MRSA<br />
bacteraemia episodes as well as a significant reducti<strong>on</strong> of the<br />
overall number of cl<strong>in</strong>ical isolates of MRSA and ESBL-produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
E. coli and Klebsiella spp. 494 The programme was subsequently<br />
expanded to another six health-care <strong>in</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>s and then to<br />
the entire state of Victoria. After 24 m<strong>on</strong>ths and 12 m<strong>on</strong>ths of<br />
follow-up, respectively, MRSA bacteraemia and the number of<br />
MRSA cl<strong>in</strong>ical isolates significantly decreased both <strong>in</strong> the 6 pilot<br />
hospital and statewide (see Table I.22.1). 719 In another study,<br />
the <strong>in</strong>terventi<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sisted of the hospitalwide <strong>in</strong>troducti<strong>on</strong> of<br />
an alcohol-based gel and MRSA surveillance feedback through<br />
charts. 718 Significant reducti<strong>on</strong>s of MRSA bacteraemia and<br />
MRSA central l<strong>in</strong>e-associated bacteraemia were observed<br />
hospitalwide and <strong>in</strong> the ICU, respectively, with a follow-up of 36<br />
m<strong>on</strong>ths. In this study, however, it is difficult to def<strong>in</strong>e the actual<br />
role of hand hygiene to reduce MRSA bacteraemia, because<br />
charts were a str<strong>on</strong>g comp<strong>on</strong>ent of the <strong>in</strong>terventi<strong>on</strong> and, at the<br />
same time general <strong>in</strong>fecti<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trol measures were <strong>in</strong>tensified<br />
and the use of antibiotic-coated central venous catheters was<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> the ICU.<br />
In 2000, a landmark study by Pittet and colleagues 60<br />
dem<strong>on</strong>strated that implement<strong>in</strong>g a multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary programme<br />
to promote <strong>in</strong>creased use of an alcohol-based handrub led<br />
to <strong>in</strong>creased compliance of HCWs with recommended hand<br />
hygiene practices and a reduced prevalence of HCAI. Individual<br />
bottles of handrub soluti<strong>on</strong> were distributed <strong>in</strong> large numbers<br />
to all wards, and custom-made holders were mounted <strong>on</strong> all<br />
beds to facilitate access to hand antisepsis. HCWs were also<br />
encouraged to carry a bottle <strong>in</strong> their pocket. The promoti<strong>on</strong>al<br />
strategy was multimodal and <strong>in</strong>volved a multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary team<br />
of HCWs, the use of wall posters, the promoti<strong>on</strong> of bedside<br />
handrubs throughout the <strong>in</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>, and regular performance<br />
feedback to all HCWs (see http://www.hopisafe.ch for further<br />
details <strong>on</strong> methodology). HCAI rates, attack rates of MRSA<br />
124