23.07.2014 Views

WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care - Safe Care ...

WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care - Safe Care ...

WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care - Safe Care ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PART I. REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC DATA RELATED TO HAND HYGIENE<br />

Perceived barriers to adherence with hand hygiene practice<br />

recommendati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong>clude sk<strong>in</strong> irritati<strong>on</strong> caused by hand hygiene<br />

agents, <strong>in</strong>accessible hand hygiene supplies, <strong>in</strong>terference with<br />

HCW–patient relati<strong>on</strong>ships, patient needs perceived as a<br />

priority over hand hygiene, wear<strong>in</strong>g of gloves, forgetfulness,<br />

lack of knowledge of guidel<strong>in</strong>es, <strong>in</strong>sufficient time for hand<br />

hygiene, high workload and understaff<strong>in</strong>g, and the lack of<br />

scientific <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> show<strong>in</strong>g a def<strong>in</strong>itive impact of improved<br />

hand hygiene <strong>on</strong> HCAI rates. 608,656,663,666,722-725,729,731,732 Some<br />

of the perceived barriers to adherence with hand hygiene<br />

guidel<strong>in</strong>es have been assessed or quantified <strong>in</strong> observati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

studies. 608,663,666,720,722-724 Table I.16.3 lists the most frequently<br />

reported reas<strong>on</strong>s that are possibly, or effectively, associated<br />

with poor adherence. Some of these barriers are discussed <strong>in</strong><br />

Part I, Secti<strong>on</strong> 14 (i.e. sk<strong>in</strong> irritati<strong>on</strong>, no easy access to hand<br />

hygiene supplies), and <strong>in</strong> Part I, Secti<strong>on</strong> 23.1 (i.e. impact of use<br />

of gloves <strong>on</strong> hand hygiene practices).<br />

Lack of knowledge of guidel<strong>in</strong>es for hand hygiene, lack of<br />

recogniti<strong>on</strong> of hand hygiene opportunities dur<strong>in</strong>g patient<br />

care, and lack of awareness of the risk of cross-transmissi<strong>on</strong><br />

of pathogens are barriers to good hand hygiene practices.<br />

Furthermore, some HCWs believed that they washed their<br />

hands when necessary even when observati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong>dicated that<br />

they did not. 218,220,666,667,676,733<br />

Additi<strong>on</strong>al perceived barriers to hand hygiene behaviour<br />

are listed <strong>in</strong> Table I.16.3. These are relevant not <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong> the<br />

<strong>in</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al level, but also to particular HCWs or HCW groups.<br />

Table I.16.1<br />

Frequency of hand hygiene acti<strong>on</strong>s am<strong>on</strong>g health-care workers<br />

Reference Year of publicati<strong>on</strong> Average no. of hand hygiene acti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Ayliffe et al. 137 1988 5 per 8 hours<br />

Broughall 218 1984 5–10 per shift<br />

W<strong>in</strong>nefeld et al. 262 2000 10 per shift<br />

McCormick, Buchman & Maki 624 2000 13.1–15.9 per day*<br />

Boyce, Kelliher & Vallande 264 2000 1.7 per hour*<br />

Boyce, Kelliher & Vallande 264 2000 1.8 per hour**<br />

Ojajarvi, Makela & Rantasalo 219 1977 20–42 per 8-hour shift*<br />

Lars<strong>on</strong> et al. 647 2000 1.8 per hour*<br />

Lars<strong>on</strong> et al. 647 2000 2.0 per hour<br />

Berndt et al. 623 2000 22 per day<br />

Lars<strong>on</strong> et al. 217 1991 1.7–2.1 per hour<br />

Lars<strong>on</strong> et al. 79 1998 2.1 per hour*<br />

Lam, Lee & Lau 648 2004 2.2 per hour*<br />

Taylor 611 1978 3 per hour<br />

Gould 649 1994 3.3 per hour<br />

Girard, Amazian & Fabry 613 2001 3.5 per hour<br />

Noritomi et al. 650 2007 6.3 per hour<br />

Rosenthal et al. 651 2003 9.9 per hour*<br />

Pittet et al. 652 2003 4.4 per hour<br />

Harbarth et al. 653 2001 12 per hour<br />

Lars<strong>on</strong>, Albrecht & O’Keefe 654 2005 7.0 per hour<br />

Girou et al. 655 2006 15.2 per hour<br />

* <strong>Hand</strong>wash<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong>ly reported <strong>in</strong> the study.<br />

** <strong>Hand</strong>rubb<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong>ly reported <strong>in</strong> the study.<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!