23.07.2014 Views

WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care - Safe Care ...

WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care - Safe Care ...

WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care - Safe Care ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PART I. REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC DATA RELATED TO HAND HYGIENE<br />

studies have also documented that the hands (or gloves) of<br />

HCWs may be c<strong>on</strong>tam<strong>in</strong>ated after touch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>animate objects<br />

<strong>in</strong> patients’ rooms. 73,111,112,125-130 Furthermore, a recent two-part<br />

study c<strong>on</strong>ducted <strong>in</strong> a n<strong>on</strong>-health-care sett<strong>in</strong>g found <strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>in</strong>itial phase that patients with natural rh<strong>in</strong>ovirus <strong>in</strong>fecti<strong>on</strong>s often<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tam<strong>in</strong>ated multiple envir<strong>on</strong>mental sites <strong>in</strong> their rooms. In<br />

the sec<strong>on</strong>d part of the study, c<strong>on</strong>tam<strong>in</strong>ated nasal secreti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

from the same <strong>in</strong>dividuals were used to c<strong>on</strong>tam<strong>in</strong>ate surfaces<br />

<strong>in</strong> rooms, and touch<strong>in</strong>g c<strong>on</strong>tam<strong>in</strong>ated sites 1–178 hours later<br />

frequently resulted <strong>in</strong> the transfer of the virus to the f<strong>in</strong>gertips of<br />

the <strong>in</strong>dividuals. 131<br />

Bhalla and colleagues studied patients with sk<strong>in</strong> col<strong>on</strong>izati<strong>on</strong><br />

by S. aureus (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g MRSA) and found that the organism<br />

was frequently transferred to the hands of HCWs who touched<br />

both the sk<strong>in</strong> of patients and surround<strong>in</strong>g envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />

surfaces. 96 Hayden and colleagues found that HCWs seldom<br />

enter patient rooms without touch<strong>in</strong>g the envir<strong>on</strong>ment, and<br />

that 52% of HCWs whose hands were free of VRE up<strong>on</strong><br />

enter<strong>in</strong>g rooms c<strong>on</strong>tam<strong>in</strong>ated their hands or gloves with<br />

VRE after touch<strong>in</strong>g the envir<strong>on</strong>ment without touch<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

patient. 114 Laboratory-based studies have shown that touch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tam<strong>in</strong>ated surfaces can transfer S. aureus or Gram-negative<br />

bacilli to the f<strong>in</strong>gers. 132 Unfortunately, n<strong>on</strong>e of the studies deal<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with HCW hand c<strong>on</strong>tam<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> was designed to determ<strong>in</strong>e if<br />

the c<strong>on</strong>tam<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> resulted <strong>in</strong> the transmissi<strong>on</strong> of pathogens to<br />

susceptible patients.<br />

Many other studies have reported c<strong>on</strong>tam<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> of HCWs’<br />

hands with potential pathogens, but did not relate their f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

to the specific type of preced<strong>in</strong>g patient c<strong>on</strong>tact. 78,79,94,132-142 For<br />

example, <strong>in</strong> studies c<strong>on</strong>ducted before glove use was comm<strong>on</strong><br />

am<strong>on</strong>g HCWs, Ayliffe and colleagues 137 found that 15% of<br />

nurses work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an isolati<strong>on</strong> unit carried a median of 1x 10 4<br />

CFU of S. aureus <strong>on</strong> their hands; 29% of nurses work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a<br />

general hospital had S. aureus <strong>on</strong> their hands (median count,<br />

3.8 x 10 3 CFU), while 78% of those work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a hospital for<br />

dermatology patients had the organism <strong>on</strong> their hands (median<br />

count, 14.3 x 10 6 CFU). The same survey revealed that 17–30%<br />

of nurses carried Gram-negative bacilli <strong>on</strong> their hands (median<br />

counts ranged from 3.4 x 10 3 CFU to 38 x 10 3 CFU). Daschner 135<br />

found that S. aureus could be recovered from the hands of<br />

21% of ICU caregivers and that 21% of doctors and 5% of<br />

nurse carriers had >10 3 CFU of the organism <strong>on</strong> their hands.<br />

Maki 80 found lower levels of col<strong>on</strong>izati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the hands of HCWs<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a neurosurgery unit, with an average of 3 CFU of<br />

S. aureus and 11 CFU of Gram-negative bacilli. Serial cultures<br />

revealed that 100% of HCWs carried Gram-negative bacilli at<br />

least <strong>on</strong>ce, and 64% carried S. aureus at least <strong>on</strong>ce. A study<br />

c<strong>on</strong>ducted <strong>in</strong> two ne<strong>on</strong>atal ICUs revealed that Gram-negative<br />

bacilli were recovered from the hands of 38% of nurses. 138<br />

7.3 Organism survival <strong>on</strong> hands<br />

Several studies have shown the ability of microorganisms to<br />

survive <strong>on</strong> hands for differ<strong>in</strong>g times. Musa and colleagues<br />

dem<strong>on</strong>strated <strong>in</strong> a laboratory study that Ac<strong>in</strong>etobacter<br />

calcoaceticus survived better than stra<strong>in</strong>s of A. lwoffi at 60<br />

m<strong>in</strong>utes after an <strong>in</strong>oculum of 10 4 CFU/f<strong>in</strong>ger. 143 A similar study<br />

by Fryklund and colleagues us<strong>in</strong>g epidemic and n<strong>on</strong>-epidemic<br />

stra<strong>in</strong>s of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. showed a 50%<br />

kill<strong>in</strong>g to be achieved at 6 m<strong>in</strong>utes and 2 m<strong>in</strong>utes, respectively. 144<br />

Nosk<strong>in</strong> and colleagues studied the survival of VRE <strong>on</strong> hands<br />

and the envir<strong>on</strong>ment: both Enterococcus faecalis and E.<br />

faecium survived for at least 60 m<strong>in</strong>utes <strong>on</strong> gloved and ungloved<br />

f<strong>in</strong>gertips. 145 Furthermore, Dor<strong>in</strong>g and colleagues showed that<br />

Pseudom<strong>on</strong>as aerug<strong>in</strong>osa and Burkholderia cepacia were<br />

transmissible by handshak<strong>in</strong>g for up to 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes when the<br />

organisms were suspended <strong>in</strong> sal<strong>in</strong>e, and up to 180 m<strong>in</strong>utes<br />

when they were suspended <strong>in</strong> sputum. 146 The study by Islam<br />

and colleagues with Shigella dysenteriae type 1 showed its<br />

capacity to survive <strong>on</strong> hands for up to 1 hour. 147 HCWs who<br />

have hand dermatitis may rema<strong>in</strong> col<strong>on</strong>ized for prol<strong>on</strong>ged<br />

time periods. For example, the hands of a HCW with psoriatic<br />

dermatitis rema<strong>in</strong>ed col<strong>on</strong>ized with Serratia marcescens for<br />

more than three m<strong>on</strong>ths. 148 Ansari and colleagues 149,150 studied<br />

rotavirus, human para<strong>in</strong>fluenza virus 3, and rh<strong>in</strong>ovirus 14 survival<br />

<strong>on</strong> hands and potential for cross-transfer. Survival percentages<br />

for rotavirus at 20 m<strong>in</strong>utes and 60 m<strong>in</strong>utes after <strong>in</strong>oculati<strong>on</strong><br />

were 16.1% and 1.8%, respectively. Viability at 1 hour for human<br />

para<strong>in</strong>fluenza virus 3 and rh<strong>in</strong>ovirus 14 was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!