WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care - Safe Care ...

REFERENCES
542. Wheelock SM, Lookinland S. Effect of surgical hand scrub
time on subsequent bacterial growth. Association of
Operating Room Nurses Journal, 1997, 65:1087–1098.
543. Poon C et al. Studies of the surgical scrub. Australian and
New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 1998, 68:65–67.
544. Mitchell KG, Rawluk DJR. Skin reactions related to surgical
scrub-up: results of a Scottish survey. British Journal of
Surgery, 1984, 71:223–224.
545. Bornside GH, Crowder VH, Jr., Cohn I, Jr. A bacteriological
evaluation of surgical scrubbing with disposable iodophorsoap
impregnated polyurethane scrub sponges. Surgery,
1968, 64:743–751.
546. McBride ME, Duncan WC, Knox JM. An evaluation of
surgical scrub brushes. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics,
1973, 137:934–936.
547. Loeb MB et al. A randomized trial of surgical scrubbing
with a brush compared to antiseptic soap alone. American
Journal of Infection Control, 1997, 25:11–15.
548. Graham M et al. Low rates of cutaneous adverse reactions
to alcohol-based hand hygiene solution during prolonged
use in a large teaching hospital. Antimicrobial Agents and
Chemotherapy, 2005, 49:4404–4405.
549. Larson E et al. Skin reactions related to hand hygiene and
selection of hand hygiene products. American Journal of
Infection Control, 2006, 34:627–635.
550. Heal JS et al. Bacterial contamination of surgical gloves
by water droplets spilt after scrubbing. Journal of Hospital
Infection, 2003, 53:136–139.
551. Blanc DS et al. Faucets as a reservoir of endemic
Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization/infections in
intensive care units. Intensive Care Medicine, 2004,
30:1964–1968.
552. Cross DF, Benchimol A, Dimond EG. The faucet aerator – a
source of Pseudomonas infection. New England Journal of
Medicine, 1966, 274:1430–1431.
553. Denton M, Mooney L, Kerr KG. Faucet aerators: a source
of patient colonization with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
American Journal of Infection Control, 2000, 28:323–324.
554. Assadian O et al. Sensor-operated faucets: a possible
source of nosocomial infection? Infection Control and
Hospital Epidemiology, 2002, 23:44–46.
555. Jehle K, Jarrett N, Matthews S. Clean and green: saving
water in the operating theatre. Annals of the Royal College of
Surgeons of England, 2008, 90:22–24.
556. Kampf G, Hollingsworth A. Validity of the four European
test strains of prEN 12054 for the determination of
comprehensive bactericidal activity of an alcohol–based
hand rub. Journal of Hospital Infection, 2003, 55:226–231.
557. Kampf G, Ostermeyer C, Heeg P. Surgical hand disinfection
with a propanol-based hand rub: equivalence of shorter
application times. Journal of Hospital Infection, 2005,
59:304–310.
558. de la Puente Redondo VA et al. The effect of
N-duopropenide (a new disinfectant with quaternary
ammonium iodides) and formaldehyde on survival of
organisms of sanitary interest in pig slurry. Zentralblatt fur
Veterinarmedizin, 1998, 45:481–493.
559. Gutierrez Martin CB et al. In vitro efficacy of
N-duopropenide, a recently developed disinfectant
containing quaternary ammonium compounds, against
selected gram-positive and gram-negative organisms.
American Journal of Veterinary Research, 1999, 60:481–484.
560. Herruzo-Cabrera R, Garcia-Caballero J, Fernandez-Acenero
MJ. A new alcohol solution (N-duopropenide) for hygienic
(or routine) hand disinfection is more useful than classic
handwashing: in vitro and in vivo studies in burn and other
intensive care units. Burns, 2001, 27:747–752.
561. Herruzo-Cabrera R et al. Clinical assay of N-duopropenide
alcohol solution on hand application in newborn and
pediatric intensive care units: control of an outbreak of
multiresistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a newborn intensive
care unit with this measure. American Journal of Infection
Control, 2001, 29:162–167.
562. Heeg P, Ulmer R, Schwenzer N. Verbessern
Haendewaschen und Verwendung der Handbuerste das
Ergebnis der Chirurgischen Haendedesinfektion? [Does
handwashing and use of brush improve the result of surgical
hand disinfection?] Hygiene und Medizin, 1988, 13:270–272.
563. Heeg P. Does hand care ruin hand disinfection? Journal of
Hospital Infection, 2001, 48(Suppl. A):S37–S39.
564. Rotter ML, Koller W. Effekt der sequentiellen Anwendung
von Chlorhexidinseife und einer alkoholischen CHX-
Praeparation versus Flüssigseife und einer solchen
Praeparation bei der Chirurgischen Haendedesinfektion
[Effect of sequential use of chlorhexidine soap and an
alcoholic-chlorhexidine preparation versus liquid soap
and alcoholic-chlorhexidine preparation on surgical hand
disinfection]. Hygiene und Medizin, 1990, 15:437–404.
565. Rotter ML, Koller W. Surgical hand disinfection: effect of
sequential use of two chlorhexidine preparations. Journal of
Hospital Infection, 1990, 16:161–166.
566. Shaker LA, Furr JR, Russell AD. Mechanism of resistance of
Bacillus subtilis spores to chlorhexidine. Journal of Applied
Bacteriology, 1988, 64:531–539.
567. Widmer AF, Dangel M. The alcohol hand-rub: evaluation of
technique and microbiological efficacy with international
infection control professionals. Infection Control and
Hospital Epidemiology, 2004, 25:207–209.
568. Kampf G, Ostermeyer C. Influence of applied volume on
efficacy of 3-minute surgical reference disinfection method
prEN 12791. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 2004,
70:7066–7069.
569. Weber W, al. Surgical hand antisepsis with an alcohol-based
hand rub: equal effectiveness after application times of 1.5
and 3 minutes. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology,
2009 (in press).
570. Kampf G, Kapella M. Suitability of sterillium gel for surgical
hand disinfection. Journal of Hospital Infection, 2003,
54:222–225.
571. Greer RB, 3rd. The ritual at the scrub sink. Orthopaedic
Review, 1994, 23:97.
572. Larson E et al. Prevalence and correlates of skin damage on
the hands of nurses. Heart & Lung, 1997, 26:404–412.
573. Lampel HP et al. Prevalence of hand dermatitis in inpatient
nurses at a United States hospital. Dermatitis, 2007,
18:140–142.
574. Tupker RA. Detergent and cleansers. In: Van der Valk P,
Maibach H, eds. The irritant contact dermatitis syndrome.
New York, NY, CRC Press, 1996:71–76.
575. Summary of the multimodal strategy. Geneva, World Health
Organization, 2007 (http://www.who.int/gpsc/news/simple_
guideline/en/index.html, accessed 24 November 2008).
221