WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care - Safe Care ...
WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care - Safe Care ...
WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care - Safe Care ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
APPENDICES<br />
Appendix 4.<br />
M<strong>on</strong>itor<strong>in</strong>g hand hygiene by direct methods<br />
The power calculati<strong>on</strong>s detailed <strong>in</strong> Part III, Secti<strong>on</strong> 1.1 of the <str<strong>on</strong>g>WHO</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</str<strong>on</strong>g> for <strong>Hand</strong> <strong>Hygiene</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong><br />
are critical for obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g reliable estimates of the percentage of hand hygiene compliance at the organizati<strong>on</strong> level<br />
at a s<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> time. The objective of these calculati<strong>on</strong>s is to determ<strong>in</strong>e the sample size necessary to produce<br />
results that can be generalized to larger populati<strong>on</strong>s and can meet the def<strong>in</strong>ed degree of c<strong>on</strong>fidence and marg<strong>in</strong><br />
of error. These c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s are similar to those <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> c<strong>on</strong>duct<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t-<strong>in</strong>-time research. Examples of this<br />
approach can be found <strong>in</strong> political poll<strong>in</strong>g, market research, and educati<strong>on</strong>al test<strong>in</strong>g. When measurements are<br />
made <strong>in</strong> the c<strong>on</strong>text of an improvement <strong>in</strong>itiative, however, the research questi<strong>on</strong>s and approaches to sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
are different. An improvement team is typically <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> answer<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g questi<strong>on</strong>s: (1) are we mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
progress toward a goal of <strong>in</strong>creased hand hygiene compliance? and (2) how will we know when we have reached<br />
the goal?<br />
Studies aimed at improvement, known as analytical studies, 1<br />
seek <strong>on</strong>ly enough data, collected repeatedly at suitable<br />
<strong>in</strong>tervals, to detect and track the effectiveness or efficiency<br />
of improvement efforts over time. The requirements for data<br />
collecti<strong>on</strong> and <strong>in</strong>ference under such circumstances are different<br />
from those required by cl<strong>in</strong>ical or populati<strong>on</strong> research aimed at<br />
answer<strong>in</strong>g questi<strong>on</strong>s about efficacy. 2 For <strong>in</strong>stance, you do not<br />
need a valid scale to m<strong>on</strong>itor weight loss, <strong>on</strong>ly a c<strong>on</strong>sistent <strong>on</strong>e.<br />
It does not matter if the scale reads a few pounds too light or<br />
too heavy; as l<strong>on</strong>g as the read<strong>in</strong>gs are reas<strong>on</strong>ably c<strong>on</strong>sistent:<br />
you can successfully track your progress over time, and you will<br />
know when you have lost that extra 10 pounds because your<br />
daily read<strong>in</strong>gs will hover around the desired level. Of course, if<br />
your goal is to weigh exactly 150 lb, you will need a scale that is<br />
valid as well as reliable.<br />
In the case of improv<strong>in</strong>g hand hygiene, the improvement goal<br />
typically is to br<strong>in</strong>g compliance (i.e. the percentage of fulfilled<br />
hand hygiene opportunities) above 95% by <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g systems<br />
improvements, behavioural <strong>in</strong>centives, educati<strong>on</strong>, and other<br />
<strong>in</strong>terventi<strong>on</strong>s described elsewhere <strong>in</strong> these guidel<strong>in</strong>es. The<br />
challenge for improvers, therefore, is to determ<strong>in</strong>e if progress is<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g made towards the target, and when it has been reached.<br />
In order to judge the effects of the <strong>in</strong>terventi<strong>on</strong>s, basel<strong>in</strong>e<br />
measures should be taken <strong>on</strong> the units where improvement<br />
work is under way; then performance over time can be<br />
compared with the basel<strong>in</strong>e and the desired target or goal.<br />
Sampl<strong>in</strong>g strategies for track<strong>in</strong>g improvement <strong>in</strong>itiatives draw<br />
from both probability and n<strong>on</strong>-probability sampl<strong>in</strong>g techniques.<br />
For m<strong>in</strong>istries of health or other agencies that are <strong>in</strong>terested<br />
<strong>in</strong> gaug<strong>in</strong>g the impact of an <strong>in</strong>itiative <strong>in</strong> a regi<strong>on</strong>, a prov<strong>in</strong>ce or<br />
a health system, it may be desirable or necessary to start the<br />
work and track progress <strong>in</strong> a small sample of <strong>in</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>s or<br />
sett<strong>in</strong>gs. For example, imag<strong>in</strong>e that you have 12 cl<strong>in</strong>ics spread<br />
out across a regi<strong>on</strong>. Rather than collect<strong>in</strong>g detailed data at all<br />
12 cl<strong>in</strong>ics every day you might want to select <strong>on</strong>e cl<strong>in</strong>ic to pilot<br />
test a new strategy for hand hygiene compliance. You could<br />
select a cl<strong>in</strong>ic to be the pilot, based <strong>on</strong> your knowledge of the<br />
cl<strong>in</strong>ics (e.g. Cl<strong>in</strong>ic 4 has experience with improvement work and<br />
would be more receptive to try<strong>in</strong>g a new project related to hand<br />
hygiene compliance). This is what Dem<strong>in</strong>g characterized as<br />
judgement sampl<strong>in</strong>g. 3 Another approach would be to randomly<br />
select <strong>on</strong>e of the cl<strong>in</strong>ics to be the pilot. To do this you would<br />
write the numbers 1–12 <strong>on</strong> separate pieces of paper (it is best<br />
to use the same size of paper) place them <strong>in</strong> a bowl and stir<br />
them around. Without look<strong>in</strong>g at the pieces of paper, reach <strong>in</strong>to<br />
the bowl and select <strong>on</strong>e piece of paper. If the number 7 was <strong>on</strong><br />
this piece of paper then Cl<strong>in</strong>ic 7 would be the <strong>on</strong>e that you have<br />
randomly selected to be the pilot cl<strong>in</strong>ic for our hand hygiene<br />
test. Once a unit of analysis has been selected, you will need to<br />
make decisi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> two key c<strong>on</strong>cepts related to improvement<br />
studies: (1) the number of data po<strong>in</strong>ts needed to represent<br />
accurately the variati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> the process and (2) the number<br />
of observati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> each data po<strong>in</strong>t. Both of these<br />
c<strong>on</strong>cepts are briefly described below.<br />
Whether you are us<strong>in</strong>g judgement sampl<strong>in</strong>g based <strong>on</strong> your<br />
knowledge of the unit(s) of analysis or simple random sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
where all units of analysis have an equal probability of be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
selected, you should try to obta<strong>in</strong> around 20 data po<strong>in</strong>ts (or<br />
subgroups) before analys<strong>in</strong>g the variati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> the process. The<br />
general assumpti<strong>on</strong> beh<strong>in</strong>d this guidance is that a relatively<br />
stable distributi<strong>on</strong> of the results starts to form when you have<br />
15–25 data po<strong>in</strong>ts. 4-6 When you have fewer than 15 data po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
the variati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> the process has a tendency to be quite volatile<br />
and the probability of improperly represent<strong>in</strong>g the current<br />
variati<strong>on</strong> due to a type I or type II error <strong>in</strong>creases. 7 Obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
around 20 data po<strong>in</strong>ts, therefore, taken with<strong>in</strong> the unit of<br />
analysis where improvement efforts are under way, can provide<br />
a robust enough estimate to gauge whether improvement is<br />
occurr<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
When track<strong>in</strong>g hand hygiene compliance, the preferred measure<br />
is typically a percentage where the numerator is the total<br />
number of times an HCW was observed to have appropriately<br />
washed his or her hands before and after a patient encounter.<br />
The denom<strong>in</strong>ator is the total number of observati<strong>on</strong>s made.<br />
When analys<strong>in</strong>g data based <strong>on</strong> percentages it is advisable to<br />
have denom<strong>in</strong>ators that are at least <strong>in</strong> the double digits. The<br />
general guidance is that a m<strong>in</strong>imum of 12–15 observati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
should be <strong>in</strong> the denom<strong>in</strong>ator before a percentage is calculated.<br />
For example, if you have <strong>on</strong>ly 4 observati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the denom<strong>in</strong>ator<br />
and 2 of the HCWs (the numerator) properly washed their hands<br />
this produces a 50% compliance number (2/4 = 50%). But this<br />
is not as robust a 50% calculati<strong>on</strong> as <strong>on</strong>e with a denom<strong>in</strong>ator<br />
of 18 with 9 HCWs as the numerator. Data collecti<strong>on</strong> for<br />
improvement not <strong>on</strong>ly needs to be based <strong>on</strong> sound statistical<br />
methods but it also needs to be practical and reas<strong>on</strong>ably easy<br />
for the data collectors. Those <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g more <strong>in</strong>sight<br />
<strong>on</strong> more precise sampl<strong>in</strong>g estimates than those offered <strong>in</strong> the<br />
247