23.07.2014 Views

WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care - Safe Care ...

WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care - Safe Care ...

WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care - Safe Care ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PART I. REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC DATA RELATED TO HAND HYGIENE<br />

plates. 227 The relative efficacy of pla<strong>in</strong> soap, antimicrobial soaps,<br />

and alcohol-based soluti<strong>on</strong>s to reduce the number of bacteria<br />

recovered from hands immediately after use of products for<br />

surgical hand preparati<strong>on</strong> is shown <strong>in</strong> Table I.11.9. A comparis<strong>on</strong><br />

of five surgical hand antisepsis products – two alcohol-based<br />

handrubs and three handwashes (active <strong>in</strong>gredient triclosan,<br />

CHG or povid<strong>on</strong>e-iod<strong>in</strong>e) – by EN 12791, an <strong>in</strong> vivo laboratory<br />

test, showed that preparati<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g povid<strong>on</strong>e-iod<strong>in</strong>e<br />

and triclosan failed the test, although all products passed the<br />

<strong>in</strong> vitro suspensi<strong>on</strong> test of prEN 12054. Better results were<br />

achieved with the alcohol-based handrubs. 464 Alcohol-based<br />

soluti<strong>on</strong>s were more effective than wash<strong>in</strong>g hands with pla<strong>in</strong><br />

soap <strong>in</strong> all studies, and reduced bacterial counts <strong>on</strong> hands to<br />

a greater extent than antimicrobial soaps or detergents <strong>in</strong> most<br />

experiments. 268,271,280-286,301,313,316,461-463 Table I.11.10 shows the<br />

log 10<br />

reducti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the release of resident sk<strong>in</strong> flora from clean<br />

hands immediately and 3 hours after use of surgical handrub<br />

products. Alcohol-based preparati<strong>on</strong>s proved more efficacious<br />

than pla<strong>in</strong> soap and water, and most formulati<strong>on</strong>s were superior<br />

to povid<strong>on</strong>e-iod<strong>in</strong>e- or CHG-c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g detergents. Am<strong>on</strong>g the<br />

alcohols, a clear positive correlati<strong>on</strong> with their c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong><br />

is noticeable and, when tested at the same c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>, the<br />

range of order <strong>in</strong> terms of efficacy is: ethanol is less efficacious<br />

than isopropanol, and the latter is less active than n-propanol.<br />

Table I.11.1<br />

Examples of comm<strong>on</strong> water c<strong>on</strong>tam<strong>in</strong>ants and their effects<br />

C<strong>on</strong>tam<strong>in</strong>ant Examples C<strong>on</strong>cerns<br />

Inorganic salts<br />

Organic matter<br />

• Hardness (dissolved compounds of<br />

calcium and magnesium)<br />

• Heavy metals (metallic elements with<br />

high atomic weights, e.g. ir<strong>on</strong>, chromium,<br />

copper, and lead)<br />

• Trihalomethanes<br />

• Prote<strong>in</strong>s, lipids, polysaccharides<br />

• Inhibit activities of clean<strong>in</strong>g and biocidal products; can also<br />

cause the build-up of scale over time or “spott<strong>in</strong>g” <strong>on</strong> a<br />

surface<br />

• Can <strong>in</strong>hibit the activities of cleaners and biocidal products;<br />

cause damage to some surfaces (e.g. corrosi<strong>on</strong>); <strong>in</strong> some<br />

cases, are toxic and bioaccumulative<br />

• Toxic chlor<strong>in</strong>e dis<strong>in</strong>fecti<strong>on</strong> by-products<br />

• Can leave harmful residues, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong> tox<strong>in</strong>s and<br />

endotox<strong>in</strong>s (lipopolysaccharide); can also reduce the<br />

effectiveness of biocides<br />

Biocides • Chlor<strong>in</strong>e, brom<strong>in</strong>e • Can cause corrosi<strong>on</strong> and rust<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong> surfaces (<strong>in</strong> particular,<br />

when carried <strong>in</strong> steam)<br />

Microorganisms<br />

• Pseudom<strong>on</strong>as, Salm<strong>on</strong>ella, and<br />

oocysts of Cryptosporidium<br />

(see Table I.11.2)<br />

• Biofilm formati<strong>on</strong> and biofoul<strong>in</strong>g; depositi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>to surfaces or<br />

products and cross-c<strong>on</strong>tam<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong><br />

Dissolved gases • CO 2<br />

, Cl 2<br />

and O 2<br />

• Can cause corrosi<strong>on</strong> and rust<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>in</strong> particular, when carried<br />

<strong>in</strong> steam); n<strong>on</strong>-c<strong>on</strong>densable gases, such as CO 2<br />

and O 2<br />

, can<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibit the penetrati<strong>on</strong> of steam <strong>in</strong> sterilizati<strong>on</strong> processes<br />

Source: reproduced with permissi<strong>on</strong> from McD<strong>on</strong>nell, 2007. 465<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!