20.10.2014 Views

Converting Waste Agricultural Biomass into a Resource - UNEP

Converting Waste Agricultural Biomass into a Resource - UNEP

Converting Waste Agricultural Biomass into a Resource - UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Environmental and Social Considerations 213<br />

This technology will provide farmers with large new markets for wheat straw.<br />

The farmers have currently found mechanisms to dispose of 530,000 tons of<br />

straw but need to find new uses for the remaining 750,000 tons. To help, the<br />

legislature passed SB2086 with provides a $15 per ton tax credit for the<br />

purchase of rice straw (New Uses Council Newsletter, Spring 1997). This<br />

technology is an ideal candidate to assist in off-farm commercial uses of the<br />

fiber.<br />

Investment and Operating Cost 214<br />

Total cost for the commercial facility system is $2,000,000. Electrical power<br />

loads are 400 HP and natural gas loads are 3,800 SCFD for the facility.<br />

Advantages to Developing Countries 215<br />

The Agro-Plastic manufacturing plants are designed for small communities,<br />

providing employment and non-farm revenues at a time when small rural<br />

communities are struggling with depressed crop prices and loss of<br />

manufacturing jobs. This will create additional income streams for rural areas,<br />

while reducing currently high waste disposal costs. This project will yield the<br />

following benefits:<br />

· New cash crop for the producers by selling wheat straw or other<br />

agricultural residue<br />

· High paying plastic's manufacturing jobs (approximately 25 - 30 per<br />

plant)<br />

· Increased tax base<br />

GHG Emission Reduction Potential 216<br />

Agro-fibers have several advantages over traditional fillers, and they improve<br />

the general characteristics of the plastic. In general, the benefits of agroplastics<br />

are as follows:<br />

· Processing temperatures are reduced to less than 400ºF, thus decreasing<br />

energy costs<br />

· From initial test runs it appears that cycle time is reduced up to 25% (in one<br />

case cycle time was reduced 50% - from 2 minutes per piece to 1 minute per<br />

piece)<br />

· Increased tensile and flexural strength compared to unfilled plastic<br />

· When compared to standard fillers such as mica, calcium carbonate and<br />

talc, specific gravity is much lower thus less material is used to make each<br />

part<br />

· Since each part weighs less, shipping costs are reduced<br />

· Reduced wear and tear on molds<br />

213 ibid.<br />

214 ibid.<br />

215 ibid.<br />

216 http://www.agroplastics.com/research/research.html<br />

390

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!