22.10.2014 Views

The significance of coherent flow structures for the turbulent mixing ...

The significance of coherent flow structures for the turbulent mixing ...

The significance of coherent flow structures for the turbulent mixing ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

» %<br />

%QÄ<br />

¾<br />

<br />

<br />

Ó<br />

<strong>turbulent</strong> velocity fluctuations · µÙá<br />

Ä ¸ , ³*µ á<br />

5.4 Properties <strong>of</strong> <strong>coherent</strong> velocity <strong>structures</strong><br />

layer appears as slightly-inclined low-speed regions with <strong>the</strong> geometrical dimensions given<br />

above. Although <strong>the</strong> exact angle varies strongly in <strong>the</strong> instantaneous velocity fields, it can<br />

be clearly seen that <strong>the</strong> angle between <strong>the</strong> wall and <strong>the</strong> shear-layer increases with increasing<br />

wall distance, see also figure 5.16. This can be explained by <strong>the</strong> different shape <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> low<br />

momentum <strong>structures</strong> due to <strong>the</strong> strong <strong>flow</strong> gradients and <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wall.<br />

¾!¨<br />

While <strong>the</strong><br />

Ä4Å<br />

near-wall region below is dominated by low-speed streaks, which will<br />

¾"¨<br />

be considered<br />

in <strong>the</strong> next chapter in detail, <strong>the</strong> ÄHÅ<br />

log-law region above is dominated by large-scale<br />

shear-layers without any obvious structural regularity in contrast to <strong>the</strong> streaks.<br />

¾#¨<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r remarkable<br />

result is <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> low Ä Å<br />

momentum <strong>structures</strong> below are usually not<br />

as long as <strong>the</strong> total length <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> large-scale shear-layer. However, as <strong>the</strong> low-speed streaks are<br />

only 30 wall-units in width and not <strong>of</strong>ten perfectly parallel to <strong>the</strong> main <strong>flow</strong> direction, as will<br />

be seen later, only a cut through <strong>the</strong> streak can be áEÄ observed in <strong>the</strong> -plane while <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> cut depends on <strong>the</strong> orientation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> streak with respect to <strong>the</strong> measurement plane and its<br />

geometrical properties. In figure 5.16 <strong>for</strong> example, a cross-section <strong>of</strong> a streak can<br />

¾}þ©¨$<br />

be<br />

¾Sþ<br />

observed<br />

¢<br />

from to 400, 500 to 800 and ano<strong>the</strong>r starts á Å at . <strong>The</strong> lower vector field <strong>of</strong><br />

á Å<br />

<strong>the</strong> same figure and <strong>the</strong> upper one <strong>of</strong> figure 5.15 indicate that on <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se shear-layers<br />

vortices can be frequently observed. <strong>The</strong> <strong>significance</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se vortices <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>turbulent</strong> <strong>mixing</strong><br />

will be investigated in <strong>the</strong> following.<br />

5.4.2 Ejection<br />

Ä ¸ and ´1µÙá<br />

Ä ¸ . In this representation, <strong>the</strong> shear-<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> pioneering near-wall <strong>flow</strong> visualisation experiments by Kline et al. (1967), Corino &<br />

Brodkey (1969) and Kim et al. (1971), it is well established that <strong>the</strong> <strong>coherent</strong> <strong>structures</strong>, which<br />

can be identified in <strong>the</strong> <strong>flow</strong> field, run through quite complex cycles. <strong>The</strong> most striking cycle<br />

or process, which could be observed, was <strong>the</strong> movement <strong>of</strong> elongated low velocity regions,<br />

designated as low-speed streaks, out in <strong>the</strong> buffer region. This motion away from <strong>the</strong> wall was<br />

associated with an oscillation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> low-speed <strong>flow</strong> structure and a violent break-up into small<br />

scale turbulence. A schematic representation <strong>of</strong> this process along with <strong>the</strong> typical velocity<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles is shown in figure 1.2 on page 6. This near-wall process, which was observed to occur<br />

suddenly and abruptly, was designated as ejection and it was speculated that a large part <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> turbulence production was associated with this observation. This becomes evident from<br />

<strong>the</strong> production term shown in <strong>the</strong> following equation. Due to <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> mean velocity<br />

gradient % »¿ %EÄ is quite large close to <strong>the</strong> wall, according to figure 5.2, and <strong>the</strong> product <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> two orthogonal velocity fluctuations · and ³ is negative, because <strong>the</strong> stream-wise velocity<br />

fluctuation · is negative <strong>for</strong> low-speed streaks and <strong>the</strong>ir wall-normal velocity component positive<br />

according to <strong>the</strong> observations, <strong>the</strong> total term becomes positive when multiplied with <strong>the</strong><br />

negative sign. This means that turbulence is produced according to equation (5.18).<br />

turbulence production (5.21)<br />

Î& · ³<br />

Based on <strong>the</strong>se considerations quantitative experiments were per<strong>for</strong>med to determine <strong>the</strong> footprint<br />

<strong>of</strong> this ejection process in detail. It was found that <strong>the</strong> typical velocity signal from<br />

<strong>the</strong> process was quite regular provided <strong>the</strong> scales and intensity were normalised properly (an<br />

example <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> signal is shown on page 133). Figure 5.17 reveals two characteristic velocity<br />

fields with significant peak intensities in <strong>the</strong> Reynolds shear stress component · ³ Z·(' ) . In<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!