21.11.2014 Views

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.5. DETONATIONS 117<br />

waves. Such theories were initiated by the works of Taylor in England, von Neumann<br />

[7] in the U.S.A., Zeldovich [8] in the U.R.S.S. and Döring [9] in Germany.<br />

Within the combustion zone that follows the initial shock wave, the gases move<br />

along the lower branch of the curve shown in Fig. 5.1, starting from point B. The point<br />

ε = 1, at which the combustion ends and the thermodynamic equilibrium is reached<br />

after the wave, cannot lie at the right hand si<strong>de</strong> of D. Therefore, the three following<br />

cases can occur:<br />

1) The combustion ends at a point such as E of the lower branch, in which the<br />

velocity is subsonic. This case represents a strong <strong>de</strong>tonation.<br />

2) The combustion ends at the point C that separates the subsonic from the supersonic<br />

branch. In C the velocity of the burnt gases with respect to the <strong>de</strong>tonation<br />

wave is sonic. The corresponding <strong>de</strong>tonation for this case is of the Chapman-<br />

Jouguet type.<br />

3) The representative point of the final state is point F in the supersonic branch.<br />

Consequently, the final velocity is supersonic and the corresponding <strong>de</strong>tonation<br />

is weak.<br />

We shall presently see that the last case cannot possibly occur. In fact, in or<strong>de</strong>r<br />

to reach point F either one has to pass by point C, in which case the reaction between<br />

C and F would be endothermic and therefore in contradiction with what happen in the<br />

combustion, or else one must pass from B to D and from D to F by means of a jump<br />

or expansion shock which is also impossible. Consequently, weak <strong>de</strong>tonations are not<br />

possible.<br />

On the other hand, nothing opposes a strong <strong>de</strong>tonation or a <strong>de</strong>tonation of the<br />

Chapman-Jouguet type. For a given case the occurrence of one or the other <strong>de</strong>pends<br />

on the boundary conditions after the wave. Let us see the influence of these conditions.<br />

When the <strong>de</strong>tonation is strong, the velocity of the burnt gases, with respect to<br />

the wave is subsonic. Any perturbation produced in the burnt gases will propagate<br />

throughout them with sound velocity and can therefore reach the wave and alter its<br />

nature. For example, an expansion of the burnt gases will reach the wave, reducing<br />

its strength down to the point where the velocity of the burnt gases with respect to the<br />

wave equals the sound velocity. In such a case the wave becomes insensible to the<br />

perturbations that occur in the burnt gases. Such is the situation that normally occurs<br />

in practice; for example, when the <strong>de</strong>tonation propagates along a tube, starting either<br />

at an open or closed end. Thus the <strong>de</strong>tonations normally observed in practice are of the<br />

Chapman-Jouguet type, due to the fact that these are the only stable ones with respect<br />

to perturbations coming from the burnt gases.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!