21.11.2014 Views

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

198 CHAPTER 6. LAMINAR FLAMES<br />

Hence, dissociation of bromine reduces the flame propagation velocity basically because<br />

such dissociation reduces the molar fractions of Br 2 at temperatures close to<br />

T f . Dissociation also influences the value for J, as shown by Eq. (6.283). However,<br />

this influence is small and it acts opposite to the influence of thermal conductivity; the<br />

value for J is very small and its influence is negligible. This last conclusion will be<br />

verified when numerical calculations are performed later on.<br />

Introducing Eq. (6.298) into Eq. (6.295) we find, for θ ≃ 1, the following<br />

behavior of X 4<br />

X 4 ≃ 1.676 e −θ r<br />

√<br />

RT f<br />

p (α 1 − α 3 ), (6.300)<br />

thus X 4 is a linear function of (α 1 − α 3 ) and, for θ ≃ 1, X 4 ≫ X 2 .<br />

Evaluation of X 1 and X 3<br />

The evaluation of X 1 and X 3 can be easily performed from the diffusion relations<br />

Eqs. (6.264) and (6.265).<br />

Equations (6.229) and (6.254) permit us to express ε 2 and ε 3 as functions of ε 1<br />

and ε 4 as follows<br />

and<br />

ε 2 = M 4<br />

M 1<br />

(ε 1f − ε 1 ) − ε 4 , (6.301)<br />

ε 3 = ε 3f + M 1 − M 4<br />

M 1<br />

(ε 1f − ε 1 ). (6.302)<br />

By introducing these expressions, together with Eqs. (6.285) and (6.286) , into<br />

Eq. (6.264) and (6.265), and if ε 4 , X 2 and X 4 are expressed as functions of (α 1 − α 3 )<br />

by use of the relations given in Eqs. (6.251), (6.298) and (6.300), two equations are<br />

obtained which <strong>de</strong>pend only on θ, (ε 1f − ε 1 ), α 1 and α 3 . These expressions can be<br />

<strong>de</strong>veloped in series of these variables near θ = 1. The results are<br />

dX 1<br />

dθ<br />

dX 3<br />

dθ<br />

[( =λ f RT f M4 X 1f<br />

+ M 1 − M 4<br />

pc p q 1 M 1 M 2 D 12 M 1 M 3<br />

(<br />

α1 α 3<br />

+O , ,<br />

ε 1f − ε 1 ε 1f − ε 1<br />

[( =λ f RT f M4 X 3f<br />

− M 1 − M 4<br />

pc p q 1 M 1 M 2 D 23 M 1 M 3<br />

(<br />

α1 α 3<br />

+O , ,<br />

ε 1f − ε 1 ε 1f − ε 1<br />

X 1f<br />

D 13<br />

+<br />

1 )<br />

X 3f<br />

M 1 D 13<br />

)<br />

1 − θ<br />

+ higher or<strong>de</strong>r terms<br />

ε 1f − ε 1<br />

X 1f<br />

D 13<br />

−<br />

1 )<br />

X 3f<br />

M 1 D 13<br />

)<br />

1 − θ<br />

+ higher or<strong>de</strong>r terms<br />

ε 1f − ε 1<br />

]<br />

, (6.303)<br />

]<br />

. (6.304)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!