21.11.2014 Views

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.15. FLAME PROPAGATION IN HYDROGEN-BROMINE MIXTURES 197<br />

where<br />

θ √<br />

g(θ) = 0.838 e − r<br />

θ θ RT f<br />

p . (6.294)<br />

Likewise, when Eq. (6.291) is substituted into Eq. (6.246), one finds<br />

√<br />

X 4 = 1.676 e − θr<br />

θ θ RT √<br />

f X2 . (6.295)<br />

p<br />

Equations (6.293) and (6.295) permit the computation of X 2 and X 4 as soon as α 1<br />

and α 3 are known. Nevertheless, before initiating the calculation of these quantities<br />

let us study the behavior of X 2 as a function of θ, since this relation influences more<br />

than any other the value of the flame velocity, as shown by Eq. (6.282).<br />

For θ → 1, the following conditions are satisfied<br />

√<br />

g(θ) → 0.838 e −θ RT<br />

r f<br />

≠ 0,<br />

p<br />

α 1 − α 3 → 0.<br />

(6.296)<br />

Therefore, for θ near 1<br />

α 1 − α 3<br />

g(θ) 2 ≪ 1, (6.297)<br />

it is now simple to show from Eq. (6.293) that, near θ = 1, X 2 behaves as follows<br />

X 2 ≃ 1<br />

2θ r<br />

p<br />

θ −1 e θ (α 1 − α 3 ) 2 . (6.298)<br />

2.808 RT f<br />

√<br />

On the other hand, when the difference 1−θ increases, the term 0.838 e −θr/θ θ RT f<br />

p<br />

<strong>de</strong>creases very rapidly since θ r ≫ 1, whilst the term α 1 − α 3 increases. Therefore,<br />

when the difference 1 − θ is not very small compared to unity, X 2 behaves as follows<br />

X 2 ≃ α 1 − α 3 . (6.299)<br />

In the different behaviors of Eqs. (6.298) and (6.299) lie essentially the influence<br />

of the dissociation of bromine on the propagation velocity of the flame. In fact,<br />

if the term X 4 is neglected in Eq. (6.255) when computing X 2 , as was done in [40],<br />

then the approximation given in Eq. (6.299) holds for all temperatures. On the contrary,<br />

when the influence of X 4 is taken into account, the values for X 2 near θ = 1<br />

are far smaller for than those given by Eq. (6.299), since then X 2 varies as the square<br />

of (α 1 − α 3 ), as shown by Eq. (6.298). Since the values for X 2 are smaller, the value<br />

for the integral I is also smaller, as shown by Eq. (6.28). Finally, if I <strong>de</strong>creases, √ Λ<br />

increases as shown by Eq. (6.284). Therefore, according to Eq. (6.272), u 0 <strong>de</strong>creases.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!