21.11.2014 Views

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

170 CHAPTER 6. LAMINAR FLAMES<br />

Thus, the problem reduces to the integration of only one reaction equation<br />

(that corresponding to O 2 or to O 3 ), which may be performed by means of one of the<br />

methods enumerated in the aforesaid.<br />

Lewis and von Elbe carried out a more arduous calculation, through the numerical<br />

integration of the resulting equation. A <strong>de</strong>tailed information on their calculations<br />

may be found in the above reference or in [9]. Even when the values of the flame velocity<br />

obtained from this calculation are several times larger than those experimentally<br />

observed, consi<strong>de</strong>ring the state of knowledge at the time, their work was published,<br />

the fact that predicted and experimental values were of the same or<strong>de</strong>r of magnitu<strong>de</strong><br />

was consi<strong>de</strong>red an important success.<br />

Recently, von Kármán and Penner [10] have recomputed the flame velocity for<br />

a set of mixtures of O 2 and O 3 , using the kinetic scheme proposed by Lewis and von<br />

Elbe, but applying the semi-analytical methods <strong>de</strong>veloped in §9. The results agree<br />

with those obtained by Lewis and von Elbe and they shown that the influence of the<br />

composition of the mixture on velocity of the flame obtained through this procedure,<br />

differ essentially from those observed by experimentation. This discrepancy is basically<br />

due to the fact that the set of chemical reactions proposed by Lewis and von Elbe<br />

and, in particular, the distribution of oxygen atoms within the flame, are different from<br />

the actual ones.<br />

Hirschfel<strong>de</strong>r and his associates [25] have recently calculated the same flame,<br />

applying the following complete kinetic scheme<br />

O 3 + G → O + O 2 + G 1)<br />

O + O 2 + G → O 3 + G 2)<br />

O + O 3 → 2 O 2 3)<br />

2 O 2 + G → O + O 3 4)<br />

O 2 + G → 2 O + G 5)<br />

(6.142)<br />

2 O + G → O 2 + G 6)<br />

This computation was carried out by means of an arduous numerical integration<br />

for which electronic computers were used.<br />

Later on, von Kármán and Penner [6] performed a simplified analysis of the<br />

problem, utilizing the same kinetic scheme and physico-chemical constants as Hirschfel<strong>de</strong>r<br />

but applying Kármán’s analytical method of integration, and postulating a distribution<br />

of oxygen atoms within the flame <strong>de</strong>termined through the extension of the<br />

steady state assumption which is wi<strong>de</strong>ly used in classical Chemical Kinetics.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!