21.11.2014 Views

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.13. OZONE DECOMPOSITION FLAME 173<br />

in the following table we give their values, referred to the value of Λ 31 which we are<br />

adopting as a reference according to the reasons stated in the foregoing.<br />

Λ 11<br />

Λ 31<br />

= 0.333<br />

Λ 14<br />

Λ 31<br />

= 0.925<br />

Λ 32<br />

= 3.486 × 10 −3 T −1<br />

f<br />

Λ 31<br />

Λ 12<br />

= 1.162 × 10 −3 T −1<br />

f<br />

Λ 31<br />

Λ 15<br />

Λ 31<br />

= 0.282<br />

Λ 33<br />

Λ 31<br />

= 0.677<br />

Λ 13<br />

Λ 31<br />

= 0.226<br />

Λ 16<br />

= 2.435 × 10 −3 T −1<br />

f<br />

Λ 31<br />

Λ 34<br />

Λ 31<br />

= 0.277<br />

Table 6.2: Values of the ratios Λ ij/Λ 31 appearing in Eqs. (6.145) and (6.146).<br />

It appears here that Λ 12 , Λ 16 and Λ 32 , which correspond to reactions 2 and 6<br />

in (6.142), are much smaller than the others, due to the following two reasons. First,<br />

because the corresponding coefficients A j are smaller, as shown by Table (6.1), and<br />

second because they are reactions requiring triple collision, as shown by Eq. (6.142),<br />

which explains the presence of term T −1<br />

f<br />

in these coefficients.<br />

Hence, it results that we can also eliminate the corresponding terms in reaction<br />

equations (6.143) and (6.144).<br />

Finally, with reference to the <strong>de</strong>nominator of these equations, it can also be<br />

simplified, keeping in mind that:<br />

1) In accordance with boundary conditions (6.147) it is ε 1f = ε 3f = 0.<br />

2) Moreover, ε 1 is very small compared to unity throughout the flame, and therefore,<br />

the corresponding term may be neglected.<br />

3) Finally, in accordance with Eq. (6.124) and consi<strong>de</strong>ring that h 0 2 is zero, it is<br />

q 2 = 0.<br />

following<br />

Taking into account these consi<strong>de</strong>rations, the said <strong>de</strong>nominator reduces to the<br />

θ − 1 + q 1 (ε 1 − ε 1f ) + q 2 (ε 2 − ε 2f ) + q 3 (ε 3 − ε 3f )1 ≃ θ − 1 + q 3 ε 3 . (6.150)<br />

Consequently if we introduce the above simplifications into the system of reaction<br />

equations (6.143) and (6.144), this system reduces to<br />

dε 1<br />

dθ = Λ λ θ ( )<br />

−3/2 e −θa1/θ X 3 − e −θa3/θ X 1 X 3<br />

, (6.151)<br />

λ f θ − 1 + q 3 ε 3<br />

dε 3<br />

dθ = −Λ λ λ f<br />

θ −3/2 ( e −θ a1/θ X 2 + e −θ a3/θ X 1 X 3<br />

)<br />

θ − 1 + q 3 ε 3<br />

. (6.152)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!