21.11.2014 Views

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 7<br />

Turbulent flames<br />

7.1 Introduction<br />

There is experimental evi<strong>de</strong>nce that turbulence increases the propagation velocity of<br />

the flame through a combustible mixture. This is a very important fact in technical<br />

applications since it allows a consi<strong>de</strong>rable reduction of the space and time required to<br />

burn a given mass. The influence of turbulence over combustion was first recognized<br />

by Mallard and Le Chatelier in 1883 [1]. However the attempts ma<strong>de</strong> to <strong>de</strong>termine the<br />

causes of this influence as well as to estimate quantitatively its value are quite recent.<br />

The basic problem lies in <strong>de</strong>termining the propagation velocity of the flame through a<br />

combustible mixture in turbulent motion knowing the characteristics of the turbulence<br />

and the state and composition of the mixture.<br />

From the experimental stand-point, several techniques are available for the <strong>de</strong>termination<br />

of the flame velocity. However the basis for such techniques are not as<br />

solid as those applied to the case of laminar flames and the measurements taken are<br />

not as numerous or systematic. Among them, the technique more commonly used<br />

consists in photographing a flame, obtained for example in a bunsen burner, then measuring<br />

the area of the combustion front and dividing it by the flow rate of the burner<br />

as is done for the case of laminar flames. One of the difficulties of such techniques<br />

is the fact that the combustion front of a turbulence flame is not well <strong>de</strong>fined since<br />

the long exposure photographs show a thick luminous zone (see Fig. 7.1a) whereas<br />

a short exposure “Schlieren” photograph reveals a very irregular and wrinkled structure<br />

(see Fig. 7.1b). These circumstances impose the introduction of an arbitrariness<br />

in estimating the flame area. Damköhler [2], for instance, adopted as surface of the<br />

turbulent combustion front the one that limits internally the luminous zone. Later on,<br />

207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!