21.11.2014 Views

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13.12. COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE THEORY 323<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

r 2 s × 102 (cm 2 )<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6<br />

t (s)<br />

Figure 13.5: Experimental results showing the linear <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce between r 2 s and time, obtained<br />

for isooctane in air at ambient pressure.<br />

On the other hand a comparison of the theoretical and experimental radius<br />

of the flame [20] shows that the former is two or three times larger than the latter.<br />

Although formula (13.76) shows that ratio r l /r s is practically in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt from<br />

pressure, Wise, Lovell and Wood [26] have experimentally observed that this ratio<br />

increases as pressure <strong>de</strong>creases. The authors explain theoretically this effects as a<br />

consequence of free convection. Photographic evi<strong>de</strong>nce shows that combustion is accompanied<br />

by strong free convection flows due to which the spherical flame appears<br />

only in the lower half of the droplet whilst in the upper half it takes a consi<strong>de</strong>rably<br />

elongate shape. The intense formation of carbon observed makes difficult the optical<br />

study of this region. This convection effect may account for the difference between<br />

the theoretical and experimental values of the flame radius making the values of k<br />

predicted by theory agree with the experimental values as previously seen.<br />

Formula (13.73) shows that the burning velocity of a droplet is practically in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt<br />

from pressure. In fact, its only influence shows small reduction of latent<br />

heat of evaporation that accompanies and increase in pressure. However, Hall and<br />

Die<strong>de</strong>richsen [23] have experimentally checked that the burning velocity of a droplet<br />

is approximately proportional to the 4th root of pressure. It has been suggested [20]<br />

that the following factors could account for this effect, asi<strong>de</strong> from the aforementioned<br />

<strong>de</strong>creases in evaporation heat:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!