21.11.2014 Views

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.4. COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 219<br />

It is also impossible here to estimate which fraction of the intensity given by (7.28)<br />

will actually turn into turbulence in each case.<br />

7.4 Comparison with experimental results<br />

As aforesaid the available experimental evi<strong>de</strong>nce is not sufficient to establish either<br />

one of the proposed theories in a <strong>de</strong>finite way precluding the others. We owe the most<br />

complete set of experiments to Bollinger and Williams [2] and to Wohl and Shores [7]<br />

referred to herein. Some of the results obtained show laws of variation of u t which<br />

approach those predicted by Karlovitz and by Scurlock and Grover. However, their<br />

effects appear which are either not predicted by theory or in contradiction with it. An<br />

example of effects not predicted is the influence of the mixture’s composition, since<br />

it is verified that the effect of turbulence is not the same for rich mixtures than for<br />

poor ones, even when operating un<strong>de</strong>r i<strong>de</strong>ntical conditions and with the same laminar<br />

propagation velocity. This is especially true for certain combustibles (like butane) and<br />

this fact cannot be explained with any of the proposed theories. Wohl believes this<br />

effect to be due to the different laminar stability in poor and rich mixtures. An example<br />

of effects appearing in contradiction with theory is the influence of the scale of<br />

turbulence, which after Scurlock’s predictions, should be consi<strong>de</strong>rable and which according<br />

to experimental results is very small. Consequently it is necessary to increase<br />

experimental evi<strong>de</strong>nce before final <strong>de</strong>cision may be reached.<br />

References<br />

[1] Mallard, F. and Le Chatelier, H.: Ann. <strong>de</strong> Mines. Vol. 8, Sev. 4, 1884, p. 274.<br />

[2] Damköhler, G.: The Effect of Turbulence on the Flame Velocity in Gas Mixtures.<br />

NACA Tech. Mem. No. 1112, 1947.<br />

[3] Bollinger L. M. and Williams, D. T.: Effect of Reynolds Number in the Turbulent-<br />

Flow Range on Flame Speeds of Bunsen-Burner Flames. NACA Tech. Note<br />

No. 1707, Sept. 1948.<br />

[4] Scurlock, A. C.: Flame Stabilization and Propagation in High Velocity Gas<br />

Streams. Meteor Report No. 19, July 1948.<br />

[5] Williams, G. C., Hottel, H. C. and Scurlock, A. C.: Flame Stabilization and<br />

Propagation in High Velocity Gas Streams. Third Symposium (International)<br />

on Combustion, Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1949, pp. 21-40.<br />

[6] Karlovitz, B. Denniston, D. W. and Wells, F. E.: Investigation of Turbulent<br />

Flames. Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 19, No. 5, May 1951.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!