21.11.2014 Views

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Untitled - Aerobib - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

254 CHAPTER 10. AEROTHERMODYNAMIC FIELD OF A STABILIZED FLAME<br />

U η=1<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

M η=1<br />

M cr<br />

U η=1<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

M cr<br />

, M η=1<br />

0<br />

0.0<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12<br />

λ<br />

Figure 10.8: Critical conditions for the complete combustion as a function of the <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />

ratio λ.<br />

Figure 10.8, in which the values of M cr thus calculated have been taken from<br />

[5], shows that the choking effects impose an important limitation to the velocity at<br />

which gases enter the combustion chamber. Choking effects can be avoi<strong>de</strong>d by using<br />

an expanding combustion chamber. It is interesting to point out that when the maximum<br />

Mach number is calculated at critical conditions, that is, at the initiation of the<br />

choking phenomenon, this number is slightly larger than one. This value corresponds<br />

to the unburnt gases at the point where the flame reaches the chamber wall. Therefore,<br />

in the neighbourhood of this point, there exists a small area where the flow is slightly<br />

supersonic. Details of the calculation can be found in Tsien’s work. Furthermore,<br />

Tsien’s analysis shows that Scurlock’s hydrodynamic theory gives satisfactory results<br />

when the entry Mach number is not too close to the critical.<br />

Recently, G. Ernst [9] has applied Tsien’s method to the same problem as well<br />

as to the study of other types of combustion chambers and other arrangements of the<br />

stabilizer. Ernst substitutes Tsien’s linear velocity profile for a parabolic one with<br />

an exponent 1.33, which is the one that best fits the profiles obtained by Scurlock.<br />

Moreover, instead of assuming a constant <strong>de</strong>nsity for the burnt gases at each cross<br />

section of the chamber, he inclu<strong>de</strong>s the effect of the slight <strong>de</strong>nsity variation of the burnt<br />

gases. However, Ernst’s results only differ slightly from those obtained by Tsien.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!