21.11.2014 Views

Desktop Study on - Regional Climate Change Adaptation ...

Desktop Study on - Regional Climate Change Adaptation ...

Desktop Study on - Regional Climate Change Adaptation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Assessment of Capacity Gaps and Needs of South East Asia Countries<br />

in Addressing Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptati<strong>on</strong> to <strong>Climate</strong> Variability and <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Change</strong><br />

the Center for Agriculture and Forestry Research<br />

Informati<strong>on</strong> 2009 - 2013, published in December<br />

2008, and limits to bio-fuels as energy resources and<br />

carb<strong>on</strong> sequestrati<strong>on</strong> in the strategic plan for 2007 -<br />

2012 (NAFRI, 2008a). In the NAPA, it is stated that no<br />

adequate tools and equipments are available to the<br />

NAFRI for developing and promoting animal species<br />

and crop varieties that are adapted to the local<br />

natural hazard c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s (Lao PDR, 2009a). This gap<br />

is intended to be tackled by NAPA’s project number<br />

6. Another example is project number 13, that<br />

addresses the lack of capacity of technical staff for<br />

researching <strong>on</strong> and developing biological fertilizers<br />

in order to improve the agricultural producti<strong>on</strong> (Lao<br />

PDR, 2009a).<br />

Lao PDR being majorly a rice crop based ec<strong>on</strong>omy,<br />

there is a need for both direct and indirect<br />

assessment of climate change impacts <strong>on</strong> rice value<br />

chain. However, this appears to be off the radar at<br />

this point of time in the government or various d<strong>on</strong>or<br />

agencies being in the strategy and planning process.<br />

Moreover, in order to assess the direct biological<br />

impacts of climate change, an applicati<strong>on</strong> of crop<br />

growth model is needed. Lao PDR is yet to exercise<br />

such models or risk management approaches in this<br />

c<strong>on</strong>text. Furthermore, in order to understand the<br />

potential impacts of water shortage, groundwater<br />

depleti<strong>on</strong> and its implicati<strong>on</strong> to livelihood or income<br />

generati<strong>on</strong>, a basic modelling toolkit such as water<br />

balance model, input-output optimizati<strong>on</strong> and<br />

maximizati<strong>on</strong> methods and practices are important<br />

that is unavailable for informed decisi<strong>on</strong> making<br />

processes.<br />

Recent Projects in the Agriculture<br />

Sector<br />

In August 2009, the GEF submitted a project proposal<br />

from the UNDP to the Least Developed Countries<br />

Fund (LDCF), intended to improve the resilience<br />

of the Lao agricultural sector to climate change<br />

impacts (GEF, 2009). The project aims to fulfil the<br />

implementati<strong>on</strong> by 2014, including the comp<strong>on</strong>ents<br />

of access to climate risk informati<strong>on</strong>, policy analysis<br />

and capacity building, community-based climate risk<br />

reducti<strong>on</strong>, and adaptati<strong>on</strong> learning.<br />

Socio-Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Sector<br />

Range of Studies Reviewed and<br />

Methods Applied<br />

Data and informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omic implicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

of disasters has been reviewed from the Internati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

Disaster Database (EM-DAT, 2009) and the Global<br />

Facility for Disaster Risk and Recovery (GFDRR,<br />

2009a).<br />

The Lao PDR NAPA report (Lao PDR, 2009a) and<br />

food security and vulnerability analysis of the<br />

WFP (2007) provides informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Lao PDR’s<br />

vulnerability regarding socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omic aspects.<br />

Regarding adaptati<strong>on</strong> strategies, Brahmi and<br />

Poumph<strong>on</strong>e (2002) c<strong>on</strong>ducted a study <strong>on</strong> local<br />

coping mechanisms in disaster management through<br />

a survey in nine Lao villages of different geographical<br />

and ethnical ranges.<br />

Socio-Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Impacts<br />

The most recent major natural hazard – number nine<br />

out of the top ten regarding the number of affected<br />

people in the period 1980-2009 – was a flood in<br />

August 2008 (EM-DAT, 2009). It is estimated to have<br />

affected more than 204,000 people, damaged 50,000<br />

ha of arable land and caused an ec<strong>on</strong>omic loss of over<br />

US$ 9 milli<strong>on</strong> (EM-DAT, 2009; GFDRR, 2009d). The<br />

GFDRR notes that because of high degree of poverty<br />

in rural areas, even natural disasters of low intensity<br />

affect rural farmers (GFDRR, 2009a).<br />

A key issue regarding socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omic impacts is<br />

that climate change is likely to increase food and<br />

forestry trade, with developing countries becoming<br />

more dependent <strong>on</strong> food imports (Easterling et al.,<br />

2007). The expected impacts of climate change <strong>on</strong><br />

countries GDPs depend <strong>on</strong> the scenario and regi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

However, poor countries are likely to suffer damages<br />

in all climate scenarios. A recent study projects that<br />

by 2100, the poorest quartile of the world‘s nati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

– including Lao PDR and Viet Nam – will suffer<br />

significant damages in percentage of GDP, across all<br />

scenarios, while the richer quartile will benefit in all<br />

but <strong>on</strong>e scenario (Mendelsohn, 2006).<br />

Vulnerability and Adaptati<strong>on</strong> in the<br />

Socio-Ec<strong>on</strong>omic C<strong>on</strong>text<br />

Vulnerability<br />

Poverty in Lao PDR could be reduced over the past<br />

years: 39% of households were living below the<br />

poverty line in 1992/3, whereas the percentage was<br />

29% in 2002/3 (Lao PDR, 2009a). But still, Lao PDR<br />

is – beside Cambodia, Myanmar and Timor Leste –<br />

<strong>on</strong>e of the four Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in<br />

Southeast Asia: The per capita income in 2005 was<br />

US$491 and in 2004, 71% of the populati<strong>on</strong> had<br />

less than US$2 available a day for supporting their<br />

livelihood (WFP, 2007).<br />

Laotian’s livelihoods depend str<strong>on</strong>gly <strong>on</strong> Lao PDR’s<br />

natural resources – namely 80% of the populati<strong>on</strong><br />

–, which makes the country highly vulnerable to<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!