24.12.2014 Views

Daniel l. Rubinfeld

Daniel l. Rubinfeld

Daniel l. Rubinfeld

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

168 Part 2 Producers, Consumers, and Competitive Markets<br />

5 Choice Under Uncertainty 69<br />

Common stocks (S&P 500)<br />

Long-term corporate bonds<br />

U.S. Treasury bills<br />

REAL RATE OF<br />

RETURN(%)<br />

9.5<br />

2.7<br />

0.6<br />

RiSK<br />

(STANDARD<br />

DEVIATION, %)<br />

20.2<br />

8.3<br />

3.2<br />

Treasury bills, only in stocks, or in some combination of the h\'o. As we will see,<br />

this problem is analogous to the co.nsumer's problem of allocating a budget<br />

betw'een purchases of food and clothmg.<br />

Let's denote the risk-free return on the Treasury bill by Rr. Because the rehlrn<br />

's risk free, the expected and actual returns are the same, In addition, let the<br />

~xpected return from investing in the stock market be RIJI and the actual rehm1 be<br />

l' The achlal rehlrn is risky At the time of the investment decision, we know<br />

th~ set of possible outcomes and the likelihood of each, but we do not know<br />

what particular outcome will occur, The risky asset will have a higher expected<br />

return than the risk-free asset (RIJI > Rr). Otherwise, risk-averse investors \\'ould<br />

buy only Treasury bills and no stocks would be sold.<br />

expected return Return that<br />

an asset should earn on a\'erage<br />

actual return Return that an<br />

asset earns,<br />

instead of appreciating, and the price of GM stock might ha\'e risen instead of<br />

falling. Howe\'er, we can still compare assets by looking at their expected<br />

returns. The expected return on an asset is the expected ('ollie of its tetl/m, i.e., the<br />

return that it should earn on average, In some years, an asset's actual return<br />

may be much higher than its expected return and in some years much lower.<br />

Over a long period, howe\'er, the average return should be close to the expected<br />

return.<br />

Different assets ha\'e different expected rehlrns. Table 5.8, for example, shows<br />

that while the expected real return of a U.s. Treasury bill has been less than 1<br />

percent, the expected real return on a group of representative stocks on the New<br />

York Stock Exchange has been more than 9 percentY Why \·vould anyone buy a<br />

Treasury bill when the expected return on stocks is so much higher Because the<br />

demand for an asset depends not just on its expected return, but also on its risk:<br />

Although stocks have a higher expected return than Treasury bills, they also<br />

carry much more risk. One measure of risk, the standard deviation of the real<br />

annual return, is equal to 202 percent for com,mon stocks, 8.3 percent for corporate<br />

bonds, and only 3.2 percent for u.s. Treasury bills.<br />

The numbers in Table 5.8 suggest that the higher the expected return on an<br />

im'estment, the greater the risk ilwolved. Assuming that one's irwestments are<br />

well di\'ersified, this is indeed the case. 13 As a result, the risk-averse im'estor<br />

must balance expected return against risk, We examine this trade-off in more<br />

detail in the next section,<br />

and Return<br />

Suppose a woman wants to im'est her savings in two assets-Treasury bills,<br />

vvhich are almost risk free, and a representative group of stocks.l~ She must<br />

decide how much to invest in each asset. She might, for instance, invest only in<br />

To determine how much money the investor<br />

should put in each asset, let's set b equal to the fraction of her savings placed in<br />

the stock market and (1 - b) the fraction used to purchase Treasury bills. The<br />

expected return on her to_tal portfolio, R,,, is a weighted average of the expected<br />

return on the two assets: b (5.1)<br />

Suppose, for example, that Treasury bills pay 4 percent (R r = .04), the stock<br />

market's expected return is 12 percent (RIJI = ,12), and b = l/i Then Rp = 8 percent.<br />

How risky is this portfolio One measure of its riskiness is the standard<br />

deviation of its return. We will denote the stillldord deviotioll of the risky stock<br />

market investment by CTIJI' With some algebra, we can show that the stoHdord<br />

deviotioll of the portfolio, CT p (with one risky and one risk-free asset) is the fraction<br />

of the portfolio invested in the risky asset times the standard deviation of that<br />

asset: 16<br />

The investor's Choice Problem<br />

(5.2)<br />

We have still not determined how the investor should choose this fraction b. To<br />

do so, we must first show that she faces a risk-rehlrn trade-off analogous to a<br />

consumer's budget line, To identify this trade-off, note that equation (5.1) for the<br />

expected rehlrn on the portfolio can be rewritten as<br />

In §3.2, we explain how a budget<br />

line is determined from an<br />

individual's income and the<br />

prices of the available goods.<br />

12 For some stocks, the expected return is higher, and for some it is lower. Stocks of smaller companies<br />

(e,g, some of those traded on the NASDAQ) ha\'e higher expected rates of return-and higher<br />

return standard de\'iations.<br />

13 It is lIolldil'crsifiablc risk that matters. An indi\'idual stock may be \'en' risk\' but still ha\'e a low<br />

expected return' because most of the risk could be dh'ersified ~,,'ay by'holdi;1g a large number of<br />

such stocks. Z\olldil'crsifiablc risk, which arises from the fact that indi\'idual stock prices are correlated<br />

with the o\'erall stock market, is the risk that remains e\'en if one holds a diversified portfolio of<br />

stocks. We discuss this point in detail in the context of the Capital Asset Pricillg ivIodd in Chapter Ii<br />

14The easiest way to im'est in a representati\'e group of stocks is to buy shares in a IlIlItllll! flilld,<br />

Because a mutual fund invests in many stocks, one effecti\'ely buys a portfolio.<br />

15 The expected value of the sum of two variables is the sum of the expected values Therefore<br />

R" = E[bl'",l + E[(l - b)Rrl = bE[r",] + (1<br />

~' ,<br />

b)Rr<br />

.<br />

l1R" (1 b)R. ,<br />

To see why, we observe from footnote 4 that we can write the variance of the portfolio return as<br />

u~ = E[br", + (1 - b)Rr R,,<br />

Substituting equation (5,1) for the expected return on the portfolio, R", we ha\'e<br />

up E[bl'", + (1 - b)Rj - bR", (1 b)Rrf E[b(r" - Rm)f = b 2 u;,<br />

Because the standard deviation of a random variable is the square root of its \'ariance, u"<br />

bu""

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!