24.12.2014 Views

Daniel l. Rubinfeld

Daniel l. Rubinfeld

Daniel l. Rubinfeld

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

258 Part 2 Producers, Consumers, and Competitive Markets<br />

Marginal, average, and total<br />

cost are discussed in §7.2.<br />

Price<br />

(dollars per<br />

unit)<br />

60<br />

50<br />

-40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

o<br />

0<br />

C<br />

The choice of the profit-maximizing output by a competitiye firm is so impor_<br />

tant that we will devote most of the rest of this chapter to analyzing it We begin<br />

with the short-run output decision and then move to the long run.<br />

HOlY much output should a finn produce over the short run, when the firm's<br />

plant size is fixed In this section we show how a firm can use information about<br />

revenue and cost to make a profit-maximizing output decision.<br />

'10<br />

M &<br />

2 3 5<br />

Lost profit for<br />

111 < '1*<br />

&ii&¥<br />

6 7 8<br />

'1*<br />

Lost profit for<br />

'72 > '1*<br />

=~=== AR = ::v1R = p<br />

ATC<br />

AVC<br />

9 10 11<br />

Output<br />

In the short run, the competitive firm maximizes its profit by choosing an output 1]* at which its marginal cost MCis:.<br />

to the P (or marginal revenue MR) of its product. The profit of the firm is measured by the rectangle;<br />

Profit is maximized at point A, where output is q* = 8 and the price is $40,<br />

because marginal reven:le is e~u~l. to marginal cost at this point. To see that<br />

* =:= 8 is indeed the proht-maxlmlzmg output, note that at a 10l\'er output, say<br />

q =:= 7, marginal revenue is greater than marginal cost; profit could thus be<br />

i~creased by increasing output. The shaded area between 1]1 = 7 and q* shows<br />

the lost profit associated with producing at 1]1' At a higher output, say ib mar­<br />

"inal cost is greater than marginal revenue; thus, reducing output saves a cost<br />

tl1at exceeds the reduction in revenue. The shaded area between q* and 1]2 = 9<br />

shoWS the lost profit associated 'with producing at ih<br />

The MR and MC curves cross at an output of qo as well as q*. At qo, however,<br />

profit is clearly not maximized. An increase in output beyond qo increases profit<br />

because marginal cost is ,veIl belOlY marginal revenue. We can thus state the<br />

condition for profit maximization as follows: MargiJl(zl revenue equals lIlarginal<br />

cost at a poillt at wlziclz tlze I/wrgillal cost Cllrue is rising. This conclusion is very<br />

important because it applies to the output decisions of firms in markets that may<br />

or may not be perfectly competitive. We can restate it as follows:<br />

Output Rule: If a firm is producing any output at all, it should produce at the<br />

level at 'which marginal revenue equals marginal cost.<br />

The Short-Run<br />

a Competitive Firm<br />

Figure 8.3 also shows the competitive firm's short-run profit. The distance AB is<br />

the difference between price and average cost at the output level q*, which is the<br />

average profit per unit of output. Segment BC measures the total number of<br />

units produced. Rectangle ABCD, therefore, is the firm's profit.<br />

A firm need not always earn a profit in the short run, as Figure 8.4 shows.<br />

The major difference from Figure 8.3 is a higher fixed cost of production. This<br />

higher fixed cost raises average total cost but does not change the average variable<br />

cost and marginal cost curves. At the profit-maximizing output q*, the price P is<br />

less than average cost. Line segment AB, therefore, measures the average loss<br />

from production. Likevvise, the rectangle ABCD now measures the firm's total loss.<br />

IVhy doesn't a firm that earns a loss leave an industry entirely A firm might<br />

operate at a loss ill tlze slzort rllil because it expects to earn a profit in the fuhue,<br />

when the price of its product increases or the cost of production falls, and<br />

because shutting down and starting up again would be costly. In fact, a finn has<br />

two choices in the short run: It can produce some output, or it can shut down<br />

production temporarily. It will compare the profitability of producing with the<br />

profitability of shutting down and choose the preferred outcome. If the price of the<br />

product is greater tlzan the aI1ernge ecollomic cost of production, tlze finll makes a positive<br />

economic profit by producillg. Consequelltly, it-will choose to produce.<br />

But suppose that the price is less than average total cost, as shown in Figure<br />

8.4. If it continues to produce, the firm minimizes its losses at output q*. Note<br />

that in Figure 8.4, because of the presence of fixed costs, average variable cost is<br />

less than average total cost and the firm is indeed losing money. The firm should<br />

~erefore consider shutting down. If it does, it earns no revenue, but it avoids the<br />

fixed as well as variable cost of production. If there are no sunk costs so that<br />

average economic cost is equal to average total cost, the firm should indeed shut<br />

down. Because there are no sunk costs, it can invest its capital elsewhere or, for<br />

that matter, reenter the industry if and when economic conditions improve.<br />

To summarize: When there are no sunk costs, the firm's average total cost is<br />

eqal to its average economic cost Thus, tlze firm should shut dowll when the price<br />

of Its product is less thall tlze average total cost at tlze profit-Illaximizillg output.<br />

8 Profit Maximization and Competitive Supply 259

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!