24.12.2014 Views

Daniel l. Rubinfeld

Daniel l. Rubinfeld

Daniel l. Rubinfeld

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

48 Part 1 Introduction: Markets and Prices<br />

earlier. Only in 1988-1989 did prices recO\'er somevvhat, largely as a result of<br />

strikes by miners in Peru and Canada and disrupted supplies. Figure 2.19<br />

shows the beha\'ior of copper prices in 1965-1999 in both real and nominal<br />

terms.<br />

Worldwide recessions in 1980 and 1982 contributed to the decline of copper<br />

prices; as mentioned above, the income elasticity of copper demand is<br />

about 1.3. But copper demand did not pick up as the industrial economies<br />

recovered during the mid-1980s. Instead, the 1980s saw a steep decline in<br />

demand.<br />

This decline occurred for two reasons. First, a large part of copper consumption<br />

is for the construction of equipment for electric pO\ver generation and<br />

transmission. But by the late 1970s, the growth rate of electric power generation<br />

had fallen dramatically in most industrialized countries. In the United States,<br />

for example, the growth rate fell from over 6 percent per annum in the 1960s<br />

and early 1970s to less than 2 percent in the late 1970s and 1980s. This decline<br />

meant a big drop in what had been a major source of copper demand. Second,<br />

in the 1980s, other materials, such as aluminum and fiber optics, were increasingly<br />

substituted for copper.<br />

140<br />

Copper producers are concerned about the possible effects of further<br />

declines in demand, particularly as strikes end and supplies increase.<br />

Declining demand, of course, will depress prices. To find out how much, we<br />

can use the linear supply and demand curves that we just derived. Let's calculate<br />

the effect on price of a 20-percent decline in demand. Because ,ve are not<br />

concerned here with the effects of GNP growth, we can leave the income term<br />

tl out of demand.<br />

. We want to shift the demand curve to the left by 20 percent. In other words,<br />

we want the quantity demanded to be 80 percent of what it would be otherwise<br />

for every value of price. For our linear demand curve, we simply multiply the<br />

right-hand side by 0.8:<br />

Q = (0.8)(13.5<br />

8P) = 10.8 - 6AP<br />

Supply is again Q = - 4.5 + 16P. Now we can equate the quantity supplied<br />

and the quantity demanded and solve for price:<br />

16P + 6.4P = 10.8 + 4.5,<br />

or P = 15.3/22.4 68.3 cents per pound. A decline in demand of 20 percent,<br />

therefore, entails a drop in price of roughly 7 cents per pound, or 10 percent,l1<br />

2 The Basics of Supply and Demand 49<br />

120<br />

"0<br />

~<br />

100<br />

5.. 80<br />

t;<br />

c...<br />

11<br />

c<br />

2- '"' 60<br />

,~ '"'<br />

c:::<br />

40<br />

20<br />

Real Price (51972)<br />

10 TTl -;-111;-;-1-;--''-Tl;-;----'-I'1;-;-1---'-1-,"-'-'---'1'I-,-,-,----,--;--r--,--.--,----,-.,..,--r-.-~<br />

1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000<br />

Copper prices are shown in both nominal (no adjustment for inflation) and real<br />

(inflation-adjusted) terms. In real terms, copper prices declined steeply from the<br />

~arly 1970s through the mid-1980s as demand felL In 1988-1990, copper prices rose<br />

ill response to supply disruptions caused by strikes in Peru and Canada but later fell<br />

after the strikes ended. Prices declined<br />

Since the early 1970s, the world oil market has been buffeted by the OPEC<br />

cartel and by political turmoil in the Persian Gulf. In 1974, by collectively<br />

resh'aining output, OPEC (the Organization of Peh'oleum Exporting COlmh'ies)<br />

pushed world oil prices well above what they would have been in a competitive<br />

market. OPEC could do this because it accounted for much of vwrld oil<br />

production. During 1979-1980, oil prices shot up again, as the Iranian revolution<br />

and the outbreak of the Iran-Iraq war sharply reduced Iranian and Iraqi<br />

production. During the 1980s, the price gradually declined, as demand fell and<br />

competitive (i.e., non-OPEC) supply rose in response to price. Prices remained<br />

relatively stable during 1988-1999, except for a temporary spike in 1990<br />

following the Iraqi invasion of Kmvait, a decline during 1997-1998, and an<br />

increase in 1999. Figure 2.20 shO\·..,s the world price of oil from 1970 to 1999, in<br />

both nominal and real terms.<br />

The Persian Gulf is one of the less stable regions of the world, which has led<br />

to concern over the possibility of new oil supply disruptions and sharp<br />

increases in oil prices. What would happen to oil prices-in both the short rill)<br />

and longer run-if a war or revolution in the Persian Gulf caused a sharp cutback<br />

in oil production Let's see how simple supply and demand curves can be<br />

used to predict the outcome of such an event.<br />

11 You can obtain recent data and learn more about the beha\'ior of copper prices by accessing the Web<br />

site of the US Geological Survey at ",i:'d·.'!~ L'ell

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!