24.12.2014 Views

Daniel l. Rubinfeld

Daniel l. Rubinfeld

Daniel l. Rubinfeld

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

144 Part:2 Producers, Consumers, and Competitive Markets<br />

4 Individual and Market Demand 45<br />

In §2.3, we explain that the<br />

cross-price elasticity of<br />

demand refers to the percentage<br />

change in the quantity<br />

demanded of one good that<br />

results from a 1-percent<br />

increase in the price of<br />

another good.<br />

duality Alternative way of<br />

looking at the consumer's utility<br />

maximization decision:<br />

Rather than choosing the<br />

highest indifference curve,<br />

given a budget constraint, the<br />

consumer chooses the lowest<br />

budget line that touches a<br />

given indifference curve<br />

In this example, the demand for each good depends only on the price of that<br />

good and on income, not on the price of the other good. Thus, the cross-price<br />

elasticities of demand are O.<br />

We can also use this example to review the meaning of Lagrange multipliers.<br />

To do so, let's substitute specific values for each of the parameters in the problem.<br />

Let Il = 1/2, P s $1, Py = $2, and I = $100. In this case, the choices that maximize<br />

utility are X 50 and Y = 25. Also note that A = 1/100. The Lagrange<br />

multiplier tells us that if an additional dollar of income ,vere available to the<br />

consumer, the level of utility achieved would increase by 1/100. This conclusion<br />

is relatively easy to check. With an income of $101, the maximizing choices of the<br />

two goods are X = 50.5 and Y = 25.25. A bit of arithmetic tells us that the originallevel<br />

of utility is 3565 and the new le\-el of utility 3575. As we can see, the<br />

additional dollar of income has indeed increased utility by .01, or 1/100.<br />

Duality in Consumer<br />

There are two different vvays of looking at the consumer's optimization decision.<br />

The optimum choice of X and Y can be analyzed not only as the problem of<br />

choosing the highest indifference curve-the maximum value of Ll( )-that<br />

touches the budget line, but also as the problem of choosing the lowest budget<br />

line-the minimum budget expenditure-that touches a given indifference<br />

curve. We use the term duality to refer to these two perspectives. To see how this<br />

principle works, consider the follmving dual consumer optimization problem:<br />

the problem of minimizing the cost of achieving a particular level of utility:<br />

subject to the conshaint that<br />

Minimize PxX + PyY<br />

Ll(X,Y) = Ll*<br />

The corresponding Lagrangian is given by<br />

(P PxX + PyY - p.(Ll(X,Y) Ll*) (A4.15)<br />

where p. is the Lagrange multiplier. Differentiating <br />

Thus the total change in the quantity demanded of X resulting from a unit<br />

change in P x is<br />

In § .. L2, the effect of a price<br />

change is divided into an<br />

income effect and a substitution<br />

effect<br />

p. = [Ps/MUs(X,Y)] = [Py/MU,(X,Y)] = 1/A<br />

dX/dPs = (Jx/aPSIU~Ll' + (ax/aI)(aI/aPs ) (A4.17)<br />

Because it is also true that<br />

MUs(X,Y)/MUy(X,Y) = MRS.\) = Ps/ Py<br />

the cost-minimizing choice of X and Y must occur at the point of tangency of the<br />

budget line and the indifference curve that generates utility Ll*. Because this is<br />

The first term on the right side of equation (A4.l7) is the substihltion effect (because<br />

utility is fixed); the second term is the income effect (because income increases).<br />

From the consumer's budget conshaint, I = PxX + P,Y, ,,\'e know by differentiation<br />

that<br />

(A4.18)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!