24.12.2014 Views

Daniel l. Rubinfeld

Daniel l. Rubinfeld

Daniel l. Rubinfeld

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

354 Part 3 Market Structure and Competitive Strategy<br />

o Market Power Monopoly and Monopsony 355<br />

S/Q<br />

s/Q<br />

S/Q<br />

:VIE<br />

5 :\E<br />

P' I<br />

Pc l __________ _<br />

lviC<br />

Pc<br />

MV<br />

P'<br />

AR<br />

Q c Quantity Quantity<br />

The market supply curve is the monopsonist's aver~ge expe~diture curve<br />

Average expenditure is rising, so marginal expenditure li~s above It. TIle .<br />

ist purchases quantity Q~" where marginal expendIture and margmal<br />

(demand) intersect. The price paid per unit P;" is then found from the<br />

expendihue (supply) curve. In a competitive market, price and q~antity; Pc and<br />

are both They are fOlmd at the point where average expendIhlre (supply)<br />

diagrams show the close analogy between monopoly and monopsony. (a) 111e monopolist produces where<br />

i.'U"~I'l"""Vrevenue intersects marginal cost. Average revenue exceeds marginal revenue, so that price exceeds marginal<br />

cost. (b) The monopsonist purchases up to the point where marginal expenditure intersects marginal value. Marginal<br />

exceeds average expenditure, so that marginal value exceeds price.<br />

Figure 10.14 illustrates this principle. The optimal quantity for th~ monopso~·<br />

ist to buy, Q~/f is found at the intersection of the demand and Ir:argmal expenditure<br />

curves. The price that the monopsonist pays is fou~d trom the supply<br />

curve: It is the price P~, that brings forth the supply Q~,. Fm~lly, note t~at this<br />

quantity Q~, is less, and the price P;" is lower, than the quantIty and pnce that<br />

would prevail in a competitive market, Qc and PC'<br />

Monopsony and Monopoly Compared<br />

Monopsony is easier to understand if you compare it with monopoly. ~igures<br />

10.15(a) and 10.15(b) illustrate this comparison. Recall that a monopolIst ~an<br />

charae a price above marainal cost because it faces a downward-slopmg<br />

dem~nd, or average revenueocurve, so that marginal revenue is less than a~erag:<br />

revenue. Equating marainal cost with marginal revenue leads to a quantIty ~<br />

that is less than 'what w~uld be produced in a competitive market, and to a pnee<br />

P* that is higher than the competitive price Pc _ .<br />

The monopsony situation is exactly analogous. As Figure 10.1::l(b) Illustrate~f<br />

the monopsonist can purchase a good at a price below its margillal'l'nille beca~elt<br />

faces an upward-slopmg<br />

.<br />

supply, or average expen<br />

d't "e Thus tor a<br />

1 ure, CUI\. .<br />

monopsonist, marginal expenditure is greater than average ex~end:ture.<br />

Equatina marainal value with marainal expendihue leads to a quantIty Q tha'<br />

° ° .0.. k d t ice P* t<br />

is less than what would be bought m a competltive mar et, an 0 a pr<br />

is Im'\'er than the competitive price PC'<br />

Much more common than pure monopsony are markets with only a few firms<br />

competing among themselves as buyers, so that each finn has some monopsony<br />

power. For example, the major US automobile manufacturers compete 'with one<br />

another as buyers of tires. Because each of them accounts for a large share of the<br />

tire market, each has some monopsony power in that market. General Motors,<br />

the largest, might be able to exert considerable monopsony power \,\'hen contracting<br />

for supplies of tires (and other automotive parts).<br />

In a competitive market, price and marginal value are equaL A buyer with<br />

monopsony power, hm,\,ever, can purchase a good at a price belo'w marginal<br />

value. The extent to which price is marked down below marginal value depends<br />

on the elasticity of supply faCing the buyer.16 If supply is \'ery elastic (E5 is large),<br />

markdown will be small and the buyer 'will have little monopsony power.<br />

C~nversely, if supply is very inelastic, the markdown will be large and the buyer<br />

will have considerable monopsony power. Figures 10.16(a) and 10.16(b) illustrate<br />

these two cases.<br />

exact relationship (analogous to equation (10.1)) is gi\"en by (MV - P)IP = liEs This equafollows<br />

because MV ME and :VIE = ':"(PQ)/':"Q = P + Q(':"P!':"Q)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!