28.01.2015 Views

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Theological</strong>-<strong>Political</strong> <strong>Treatise</strong><br />

38 he heard the sentence against the men of Sodom, he prayed that God<br />

would not carry it out until he knew whether all of them deserved that<br />

punishment; for he says (see Genesis 18.24),‘perhaps there are ¢fty just<br />

men in that city’. Nor was God revealed to him as any other than this [i.e. a<br />

being of limited knowledge who has descended to Sodom to see how many<br />

just men there are there]; for this is how God speaks in Abraham’s imagining:<br />

‘now I will go down, so that I may see whether they have indeed<br />

acted as reported by the great outcry which has come to me, and if it is not<br />

so, I will know it’. 12 Equally, the divine testimony concerning Abraham (on<br />

which see Genesis 18.19) contains only the requirement that he should<br />

obey and instruct his servants regarding what is just and good, saying<br />

nothing about higher conceptions of God.<br />

Nor did Moses adequately grasp that God is omniscient and directs<br />

all human actions by his decree alone. For although God had said (see<br />

Exodus 3.18) that the Israelites would obey him, he nevertheless doubted<br />

this and replied (see Exodus 4.1): ‘what if they do not believe me or obey<br />

me’ Thus to him also God was revealed as uninvolved and ignorant of<br />

future human actions. For God gave him two signs and said (Exodus 4.8),<br />

‘should it happen that they do not believe the ¢rst, they should believe the<br />

latter; but should they not believe this one either, (then) take a little water<br />

from the river’, etc.<br />

In fact, anyone who re£ects on Moses’ opinions without prejudice, will<br />

plainly see that he believed God to be a being that has always existed, exists<br />

and will always exist, and for this reason he calls him ‘Jehovah’ by name,<br />

which in Hebrew expresses these three tenses of existence. But Moses<br />

taught nothing else about his nature except that he is merciful, kind, etc.,<br />

and in the highest degree jealous, as is clear from several passages in the<br />

Pentateuch. He also believed and taught that this being is so di¡erent from<br />

all other beings that he cannot be represented by the image of any visible<br />

thing nor even be seen himself, owing less to the impossibility of the thing<br />

in itself than to human limitations; as regards his power, furthermore, he<br />

deemed him a singular or unique being. Moses did indeed concede that<br />

there are beings who (doubtless by the order and command of God) acted<br />

in God’s name, that is, beings to whom God gave authority, right and<br />

power to govern nations and to provide and care for them. But he taught<br />

39 that the being whom they were obliged to worship is the highest and<br />

12 Genesis 18.21.<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!