28.01.2015 Views

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annotations<br />

[C hapte r 17 ]<br />

A n notatio n 35 (p. 209) ‘that they c ould u nde r t ake nothing in the futu re’:<br />

‘Two c o m m on s oldi e rs u nde r to ok to transfe r the gove r n me n t of the<br />

Ro man p e ople , and they did s o’ (Tac itus , Histories , 1). 45<br />

A n notatio n 36 (p. 215)‘seeNumbers 11 .28’: In this pa s s age 46 tw o m e n 47 265<br />

are accus e d of having prophe s i e d in the c amp, 48 and Jo shua advis e s that<br />

they should i m me diately b e ar reste d. He would not have don e this , 49 had<br />

it b e e n p e r mis s ible for anyon e to g ive divin e re sp ons e s to the p e ople<br />

without Mo s e s’ p e r mis s ion. Eve n s o, Mo s e s dec ide d to acquit the m, and<br />

rebuke d Jo shua for his u rg ing hi m to s e ek royal p owe r for hi ms elf at a<br />

t i me whe n he wa s s o ve r y t ire d of r uling that he would prefe r to die<br />

rathe r than gove r n alone , a s is evide n t from ve rs e 14 50 of the s ame<br />

chapte r. This is his reply to Jo shua: 51 ‘Are you ang r y on my acc ou n t <br />

Would that the whole p e ople of Go d we re prophe ts.’ That is , 52 wo u l d<br />

that the r igh t of c onsulting Go d would succe e d in plac ing the gove r n -<br />

me n t in the hands of the p e ople the ms elve s. 53 Jo shua the refore wa s not<br />

ig noran t of the law 54 but of the requireme n ts of the t i me and this is why<br />

he wa s repro ache d by Mo s e s , just a s Abishai wa s by David whe n he<br />

advis e d the king to c ondemn Shi me i to de ath, who wa s ce r t ainly guilty of<br />

trea s on ; s e e 2 Samuel 19.22^3 .<br />

Annotation 37 (p. 215) ‘ On this see Numbers 27.21’: The translators (that<br />

I happen to have seen) make a bad job of verses 19 and 23 of this chapter.<br />

These verses do not signify that he gave Joshua orders or instructions, but<br />

rather that he made or appointed him leader, as often in Scripture, e.g.,<br />

Exodus 18.23, 1 Samuel 13.14, Joshua 1.9,and1 Samuel 25.30,etc. 55<br />

45 Tacitus, Histories, 1.25.2.<br />

46 ‘In Numbers’ [in French].<br />

47 ‘W h o s e n am e s a re g iven ch. 11 ver s e 28 of t h i s b o o k’ [ in Fre nc h] .<br />

48 ‘The news of it came immediately to Moses’ [in French].<br />

49 ‘And one would not have hesitated to report it to Moses as a criminal action’ [in French].<br />

50 ‘And 15’[inFrench].<br />

51 Numbers 11.29.<br />

52 ‘You would wish that there was only me to rule; as for myself, I would wish that the right of<br />

consulting God would return to each individual and they would all rule together, and let me go’.<br />

[in French].<br />

53 ‘And they would let me go’ [in French].<br />

54 ‘And the authority’ [in French].<br />

55 ‘The harder translators try to render verses 19 and 23 of this chapter literally’, adds the (very competent)<br />

original French translator of Spinoza’s text, either Gabriel de Saint-Glain (c. 1620^84)or<br />

Jean-Maximilian Lucas (1646^97) ‘the less intelligible they make it, and I am convinced very few<br />

people understand the true sense of it. Most imagine that God commands Moses in verse 19 to<br />

instruct Joshua in the presence of the Assembly, and in verse 23 that he laid his hands upon him<br />

273

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!