28.01.2015 Views

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Theological</strong>-<strong>Political</strong> <strong>Treatise</strong><br />

They are set out in an unsystematic manner with no regard to chronological<br />

succession, and the same story is duplicated in several versions.<br />

Chapter 21, for example, explains the reason for the arrest of Jeremiah,<br />

namely, that he predicted the destruction of the city to [King] Zedekiah<br />

whilst the latter was consulting him. This narrative is then interrupted<br />

and chapter 22 moves on to the story of his denunciation of Jehoiachin<br />

143 (who reigned before Zedekiah), and his predicting his captivity. Chapter<br />

25 then describes what had been revealed to the prophet earlier, in the<br />

fourth year of Jehoiakim’s reign. The text then gives the prophecies from<br />

the ¢rst year of this king’s reign, and proceeds in the same manner,<br />

accumulating prophecies with no regard to temporal order, until ¢nally<br />

in chapter 38 he returns to the story which began to be narrated in<br />

chapter 21 (as if these 15 chapters were in parenthesis). For the connecting<br />

particle with which chapter 38 begins refers back to verses 8, 9,<br />

and 10 of chapter 21. Then, the text recounts Jeremiah’s ¢nal arrest differently,<br />

providing a very di¡erent reason for his prolonged detention in<br />

the court of the guard than was given in chapter 37. Hence, it is clearly<br />

evident that these things have all been gathered from di¡erent chroniclers<br />

and cannot be accounted for in any other way.<br />

The remaining prophecies in the closing chapters, where Jeremiah is<br />

speaking in the ¢rst person, appear to have been copied from the book<br />

Baruch wrote at Jeremiah’s dictation. For that volume (as is clear from<br />

36.2) contained only what was revealed to Jeremiah from the time of<br />

Josiah to the fourth year of Jehoiakim, which is where our book begins.<br />

Everything from chapter 45,verse2 to chapter 51,verse59 likewise seems<br />

to have been copied from the same volume.<br />

[6] The opening verses of the Book of Ezekiel plainly indicate that this<br />

too is but a fragment. The conjunction with which the book begins<br />

obviously refers to other things already said, connecting them with what<br />

is to come. Not just the conjunction, moreover, but the whole structure<br />

of the work presuppose other writings. For the thirtieth year with which<br />

the book begins indicates that the prophet is continuing rather than<br />

beginning his narrative. The writer also remarks in parenthesis in verse<br />

3,‘there had often been a word of God to Ezekiel the priest, the son of<br />

Buzi, in the land of the Chaldeans’ etc., as if he were saying that the<br />

words of Ezekiel which he had recorded down to this point referred to<br />

other things which had been revealed to him before this thirtieth year.<br />

146

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!