28.01.2015 Views

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Theological</strong>-<strong>Political</strong> <strong>Treatise</strong><br />

whether he was of good morals, whether he had certain and indubitable<br />

signs of his mission, and whether what he wanted to say in God’s name<br />

agreed with accepted doctrine and the common laws of the country. If<br />

the signs were unsatisfactory or the doctrine was new, he could rightly<br />

214 condemn him to death, but if all was well, he was accepted solely on the<br />

authority and testimony of the leader.<br />

[21] There is also, fourthly, the fact that the leader did not surpass<br />

the rest in nobility, nor by right of blood. The government of the state<br />

belonged to him only because of his age and his virtue.<br />

[22] There is, ¢nally, also the advantage that the leaders and body of the<br />

armed forces could not be carried away by a desire for war rather than peace.<br />

For the armed forces, as we said, consisted only of citizens, and therefore<br />

matters ofwar as well as of peace were handled by these same men.The man<br />

whowas a soldier in the camp was a citizen in the assembly; the o⁄cer in the<br />

camp was a judge in the council of elders; and the general in the camp was a<br />

leader in the state. Hence no one could desire war for war’s sake, but only for<br />

the sake of peace and the protection of freedom. Perhaps also a leader<br />

abstained from novelties so far as he could, so that he would not be obliged<br />

to come before the high priest and su¡er the indignity of standing in his<br />

presence. So much for the factors that kept political leaders within bounds.<br />

[23] We must now see by what means the people were held in check,<br />

and this too is clearly indicated by the principles of their government.<br />

Anyone willing to pay any attention to these will immediately see that<br />

they must have aroused in the minds of the citizens such a unique love<br />

that it would be the hardest thing in the world to induce them to betray<br />

their country or defect from it. On the contrary, they must all have been<br />

ready to su¡er death rather than tolerate a foreign power. For having<br />

transferred their right to God, they believed their kingdom was the<br />

kingdom of God, that they alone were the children of God and that other<br />

nations were enemies of God, whom for that reason they regarded with<br />

extreme hostility (believing as they did that this was pious: see Psalm<br />

139.21^2). Nothing was more abhorrent to them than to swear loyalty to<br />

a foreigner and to promise allegiance to him. No greater disgrace, nothing<br />

more detestable could be imagined than to betray their country, the<br />

very kingdom of God. Just to go and live outside the country was<br />

222

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!