28.01.2015 Views

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Theological</strong>-<strong>Political</strong> <strong>Treatise</strong><br />

For this purpose, we need to demonstrate, ¢rst and foremost, that an<br />

intellectual or precise knowledge of God is not a gift generally given to<br />

all the faithful, in the way that obedience is. Secondly, we must prove<br />

that that knowledge which God, via the prophets, required all men to<br />

possess universally and which every individual is obliged to possess,<br />

consists of nothing other than an understanding of God’s justice and<br />

charity.Both of these points are readilydemonstrated from Scripture itself.<br />

[5] For (1), the ¢rst point, most evidently follows from Exodus 6.3,<br />

169 where in showing Moses the singular grace given to him, God says: ‘And<br />

I was revealed to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob as El Shaddai, butIwas<br />

not known to them by my name Jehovah.’ To clarify this, we must note<br />

that El Shaddai in Hebrew signi¢es ‘God who su⁄ces’ because he gives<br />

each person what su⁄ces for him; and although Shaddai isoftenusedon<br />

its own to refer to God, we should not doubt that the word El (‘God’)<br />

should always be silently understood. We should further note that no<br />

name is found in the Bible other than Jehovah to indicate the absolute<br />

essence of God without relation to created things. The Hebrews therefore<br />

claim this is the only proper name of God and that all the others are<br />

forms of address; and in truth the other names of God, whether they are<br />

nouns or adjectives, are attributes which belong to God in so far as He is<br />

considered in relation to his creatures or manifested through them. An<br />

example is El (or Eloha, if we insert the paragogical letter He), which<br />

means simply ‘powerful’, as is well-known since it belongs to God alone<br />

in a pre-eminent degree, just as when we speak of Paul as ‘the Apostle’.<br />

Elsewhere the virtues of his power are given in full, as El (‘powerful’),<br />

great, terrible, just, merciful, etc., or the word is used in the plural but<br />

with a singular meaning, as is very common in Scripture, in order to<br />

include all his virtues at the same time.<br />

Hence, God tells Moses that he was not known to the patriarchs by<br />

the name of Jehovah.The patriarchs, it follows, knew no attribute of God<br />

disclosing his absolute essence, but only his acts and promises, i.e., his<br />

power in so far as it is manifest through visible things. However, God<br />

does not tell Moses this so as to charge the patriarchs with lack of faith<br />

but, on the contrary, to praise their faith and trust, by which they<br />

believed God’s promises to be true and certain, despite their lacking the<br />

exceptional knowledge of God that Moses had. For while Moses possessed<br />

more elevated conceptions of God, he entertained doubts about<br />

174

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!