28.01.2015 Views

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Theological</strong>-<strong>Political</strong> <strong>Treatise</strong><br />

It is certain, though, that it perished or was burnt along with the Temple,<br />

although there was nothing more sacred or venerated among the Hebrews.<br />

Hence, Scripture too is sacred and its discourse divine in the same<br />

way, that is so long as it moves people to devotion towards God. Should<br />

it become completely neglected, as it once was by the Jews, it is thereby<br />

rendered nothing but ink and paper and becomes absolutely devoid of<br />

sanctity and subject to corruption. If it is then perverted or perishes,<br />

it is not true to say that God’s word has deteriorated or perished, just as<br />

it would be false to say in Jeremiah’s time that it was the Temple of<br />

God, as the Temple had been until then, that perished in the £ames.<br />

Jeremiah himself says the same thing of the Law when rebuking the<br />

impious men of his time in these terms: ‘How can you say, we are<br />

trained in the Law of God and are its guardians. Assuredly, it has been<br />

written in vain, vain is the scribe’s pen!’ 2 That is, even though the<br />

Scripture is in your hands, you are wrong to say that you are guardians<br />

of God’s Law, now that you have rendered it ine¡ective.<br />

So too when Moses broke the ¢rst tablets, it was not the word of God<br />

that he cast from his hands in anger and broke (who could imagine this<br />

of Moses or of God’s word) but only the stones. They had been sacred<br />

before because the covenant under which the Jews bound themselves to<br />

obey God was inscribed upon them. But as they subsequently negated<br />

that covenant by worshipping a [golden] calf, the stones no longer possessed<br />

any sanctity whatever. It is for the same reason that the second<br />

tablets 3 could perish with the ark. It is thus wholly unsurprising that<br />

Moses’ original texts are no longer extant and the process we described<br />

in the preceding chapters could have happened to the books which we do<br />

possess, given that the true original of the divine covenant, the most<br />

sacred thing of all, has totally perished.<br />

Let [my opponents] therefore cease accusing us of impiety. We have<br />

said nothing against the word of God, nor have we corrupted it. Let them<br />

rather turn their anger, if they have any justi¢ed anger, against the ancients<br />

whose wickedness profaned the ark of God, the Temple, the Law and all<br />

162 holy things, and rendered them liable to corruption. Equally, if as the<br />

Apostle says, in 2 Corinthians 3.3, they have a letter from God within<br />

themselves, written not in ink but by the spirit of God, not on tablets of<br />

stone but on tablets of £esh, on the heart, let them cease worshipping the<br />

2 Jeremiah 8.8.<br />

3 Exodus 34.<br />

166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!