28.01.2015 Views

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Theological</strong>-<strong>Political</strong> <strong>Treatise</strong><br />

when they had to join forces to ¢ght a common enemy. This was especially<br />

the case in Joshua’s time when they did not yet all have a ¢xed<br />

abode, and all things were held in common right. But after all the tribes<br />

had divided among themselves the lands they possessed by right of war<br />

and the additional territory they were commanded to annex, no longer<br />

did all things belong to all men.This is why there was no longer any basis<br />

for a common commander, since, owing to the division, the di¡erent<br />

tribes needed to be thought of not so much [as bodies of] fellow citizens<br />

but confederates. With respect to God and religion indeed they still had<br />

to be thought of as fellow citizens, but only as confederates with regard<br />

to the right one had over another.<br />

This much resembles the situation of the States General of the United<br />

Netherlands ^ apart from the common Temple. For the division of a<br />

common thing into parts simply means that each now possesses his part<br />

alone, and the rest give up the right which they had to that part.This was<br />

why Moses chose chiefs for the tribes, so that after the division of the state,<br />

each would have responsibility for his portion, in consulting God through<br />

the high priest about the a¡airs of his own tribe, commanding his militia,<br />

founding and fortifying cities, appointing judges in each city, attacking the<br />

enemy of his own individual territory, and generally in handling all issues<br />

of war and peace. He was not obliged to recognize any judge other than<br />

God 11 or someone whom God had expressly delegated as a prophet.<br />

Otherwise, if he defected from God, the other tribes would be obliged not<br />

to judge him as a subject but attack him as an enemy who had violated his<br />

treaty obligations.<br />

We have examples of these things in scripture. When Joshua died, it<br />

was the children of Israel, not a new supreme commander, who consulted<br />

God.When it became clear that the tribe of Judah had to attack an<br />

enemy of its own for the ¢rst time, it made an agreement of its own with<br />

Simeon to attack the enemy with the joint forces of both; the other<br />

tribes were not included in this league (see Judges 1.1^3). Each tribe<br />

waged war separately (as narrated in the previous chapter) against their<br />

211 own enemies and accepted into submission and allegiance whichever<br />

they wished, even though there was a commandment not to spare any of<br />

them via any kind of agreement, but to exterminate them all. For this<br />

transgression they were indeed rebuked but not brought to justice by<br />

11 Spinoza’s footnote: see Annotation 38.<br />

218

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!