28.01.2015 Views

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The teachings of Scripture<br />

the divine promises and complained to God that instead of the promised<br />

salvation the Jews’ situation was getting worse and worse.<br />

The patriarchs, then, were ignorant of the unique name of God, and<br />

God communicated it to Moses so as to extol their faith and the simplicity<br />

of their hearts, and also to emphasize the singular grace granted to Moses.<br />

From this, it follows most evidently, as we asserted in the ¢rst place, that<br />

people are not obliged by commandment to know God’s attributes; this is a<br />

particular gift bestowed only on certain of the faithful. It is not worth<br />

adding further testimonies from the Bible to prove this; for who does not<br />

see that the knowledge of God has not been equal among all the faithful<br />

and that no one can be wise by command any more than he can live or exist<br />

by command All equally, men, women and children, can obey by command<br />

but cannot all be wise.<br />

[6] But if anyone answers that there is indeed no need to understand<br />

God’s attributes but only to believe them, quite simply, without demonstration,<br />

he is certainly talking nonsense. For invisible things which are<br />

170<br />

objects of the mind alone can not be seen with any other eyes than through<br />

conceptual demonstrations.Those people therefore who do not grasp the<br />

demonstrations, see nothing at all of these things, and therefore whatever<br />

they report from hearsay about such questions, neither a¡ects nor indicates<br />

their minds any more than the words of a parrot or a robot which<br />

speaks without mind and sense.<br />

[7] Now, before going any further, I need to explain why it is often stated<br />

in Genesis that the patriarchs called God by the name of Jehovah. This<br />

appears to stand in straight contradiction with what I have just said. If we<br />

recall, however, what we proved in chapter 8, we shall readily be able to<br />

reconcile this [seeming contradiction]. In that chapter we showed that the<br />

compiler of the Pentateuch does not denote things and places with precisely<br />

the names they had at the time to which he refers but rather with<br />

those by which they were better known in his own time. God is hence<br />

recounted in Genesis as being called by the patriarchs by the name of<br />

Jehovah, not because he was known to them by that name, but rather<br />

because this was a name supremely revered by the Jews.This is the inference<br />

we must come to, I repeat, as we are expressly told in our text from Exodus 2<br />

2 Exodus 6:3.<br />

175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!