28.01.2015 Views

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Theological</strong>-<strong>Political</strong> <strong>Treatise</strong><br />

distorted or truncated which is so badly written and composed that its<br />

sense cannot be discerned from its use of language or elicited from<br />

165 Scripture itself. I refuse to grant that because Scripture contains the<br />

divine law, it has always preserved the same points, the same letters and<br />

the same words (I leave this for the Masoretes to prove and others who<br />

have a superstitious veneration of the letter). I assert only that the meaning,<br />

which alone entitles any text to be called divine, has come down to us<br />

uncorrupted, even though the words in which it was ¢rst expressed are<br />

deemed to have been frequently altered. As we said, this removes<br />

nothing from the dignity of Scripture; for Scripture would be no less<br />

divine even if written in other words or in a di¡erent language. Thus, no<br />

one can question that in this sense we have received the divine law,<br />

uncorrupted. For we see from Scripture itself, and without any di⁄culty<br />

or ambiguity, that the essence of the Law is to love God above all things<br />

and one’s neighbour as oneself. And this cannot be adulterated nor penned<br />

in a slap-dash, error-prone manner. For if Scripture ever taught anything<br />

else than this, it would necessarily have had to teach everything else differently,<br />

since this is the foundation of all religion. Were this removed,<br />

the entire structure would immediately collapse. Such a Scripture as that<br />

would not be the same as the one we are discussing here but an altogether<br />

di¡erent book. It remains, then, indisputable that this is what Scripture<br />

has always taught and consequently that no error has occurred here<br />

a¡ecting the sense, which would not have been noticed at once by everybody.<br />

Nor could anyone have corrupted it without immediately betraying<br />

his malicious intent.<br />

[11] As this foundation is thus undeniably unadulterated, the same<br />

must be conceded about everything that £ows indisputably from it and<br />

which is hence likewise fundamental: such as, that God exists, that he<br />

provides for all things, that he is omnipotent, that he has decreed that<br />

the pious will fare well and wrongdoers badly, and that our salvation<br />

depends upon His grace alone. For Scripture everywhere manifestly teaches<br />

all these things, and thus must always have taught them; otherwise<br />

all the rest would be meaningless and without foundation.We must insist<br />

also that all the [Bible’s] moral precepts are equally free of corruption,<br />

since they most evidently follow from this universal foundation: to<br />

defend justice, assist the poor, not to kill, not to covet other men’s<br />

property, etc. None of these things, I contend, can be corrupted by<br />

170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!