28.01.2015 Views

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Theological</strong>-<strong>Political</strong> <strong>Treatise</strong><br />

49 the most high God, and that he blessed Abraham, as was the right of a<br />

priest (see Numbers 6.23), and that Abraham, the beloved of God, gave a<br />

tenth part of all his booty to this priest of God. All this su⁄ciently shows<br />

that, before God founded the Israelite nation, he had appointed kings and<br />

priests in Jerusalem and given them rites and laws; although as I said, it is<br />

not wholly clear whether he did so by means of prophecy. In any case, I am<br />

convinced that while Abraham lived there he lived religiously, according to<br />

those laws: for he received no rites speci¢cally from God, but nevertheless<br />

it is stated in Genesis 26.5 that Abraham observed the cult, precepts,<br />

practices and laws of God, and this must certainly be construed as meaning<br />

the cult, precepts, practices and laws of king Melchizedeck. Malachi<br />

1.10^11 reproaches the Jews in these terms: ‘Who is there among you to<br />

close the doors’ (i.e. of the Temple) ‘lest the ¢re be placed in vain on my<br />

altar I take no delight in you, etc. . . . for from the rising of the sun even to<br />

its setting, my name is great among the nations, and everywhere incense is<br />

brought to me, and a pure o¡ering; for my name is great among the<br />

nations, says the God of hosts’. If we do not want to do violence to these<br />

words, which can only refer to Malachi’s own time, we must surely grant<br />

that Malachi provides very clear evidence that the Jews in his time were no<br />

more beloved of God than other peoples; indeed, that God had made<br />

himself more conspicuous by miracles to other nations than to the Jews<br />

who, without [the aid of ] miracles, had at that time partly recovered their<br />

state; and that the other peoples had rites and ceremonies which made<br />

them acceptable to God.<br />

But I leave all this aside, for it su⁄ces for my purposes to show that the<br />

election of the Jews concerned only their material welfare at that time and<br />

their freedom, or independent state, and the manner and means by which<br />

they acquired it. It therefore also concerned their laws, in so far as these<br />

were essential to stabilizing that particular polity; and ¢nally the way in<br />

which these laws were revealed. But as regards everything else, including<br />

those things in which the true happiness of man consists, they were on the<br />

same footing as other men.<br />

When therefore it is said in the Bible (see Deuteronomy 4.7) that no<br />

50 people has their gods ‘so near to them’ as the Jews have God, this is to be<br />

understood only with regard to their state and only in that period in which<br />

so many miracles took place among them, etc. For as regards intellect and<br />

virtue, i.e., as regards happiness, as we have already said and proven by<br />

reason itself, God is equally favourable to all, as is indeed evident from<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!