28.01.2015 Views

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

On the divine law<br />

common people and their lack of knowledge, and that in reality God acts<br />

and governs all things from the necessity of his own nature and perfection<br />

alone, and his decrees and volitions are eternal truths and always involve<br />

necessity.This is the ¢rst point that I proposed to explain and prove.<br />

[11] Now let us pass to the second point, running through Scripture,<br />

to see what it teaches about the natural light of reason and this divine 66<br />

law. The ¢rst thing that strikes us is the history of the ¢rst man where it<br />

is narrated that God forbade Adam to eat of the fruit of ‘the tree of the<br />

knowledge of good and evil’, 4 which seems to mean that God instructed<br />

Adam to do good, and to seek it under the aspect of good and not as the<br />

opposite of what is bad, that is, to seek good for the love of good rather<br />

than from the fear of harm. For as we have already shown, he who does<br />

good from a true love and knowledge of good, acts freely and with a<br />

constant purpose, but he who does good from fear of su¡ering injury, is<br />

simply driven to avoid what is bad, like a slave, and lives at the command<br />

of another. Hence, this one prohibition laid by God on Adam entails the<br />

whole divine law and agrees fully with the dictate of the natural light of<br />

reason. It would not be di⁄cult to explain the whole history, or parable,<br />

of the ¢rst man on this basis, but I prefer to let it go. I cannot be absolutely<br />

sure whether my explanation agrees with the intention of the writer,<br />

and many people do not concede that this history is a parable, but<br />

insist it is a straightforward narrative.<br />

[12] It will be better therefore to adduce other passages of Scripture and<br />

especially passages written by one who speaks according to the natural<br />

light of reason in which he surpassed all the wise men of his time, and<br />

whose opinions the people regarded with as much veneration as those of<br />

the prophets. I mean Solomon, who is more highly commended in the<br />

sacred writings for his prudence and wisdom than for his prophecy<br />

and piety. In his ‘Proverbs’ he calls human understanding the fountain of<br />

true life and locates misfortune in stupidity alone. This is what he says<br />

at 16.22: ‘understanding is the fountain of life to him who is lord of it, 5<br />

and the punishment of the stupid is their stupidity’, where we should<br />

4 Genesis 2.17.<br />

5 Spinoza’s footnote: a Hebrew idiom. He who has something or possesses it in his nature is said to be<br />

a lord of that thing.Thus a bird is called, in Hebrew, a ‘lord of wings’, because it has wings. An intelligent<br />

man is called a ‘lord of intellect’, because he has intellect.<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!