28.01.2015 Views

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Theological</strong>-<strong>Political</strong> <strong>Treatise</strong><br />

had been prescribed to all men. Their miracles would not display the<br />

power of God any less, if they had also been performed for other nations;<br />

nor would the Hebrews be less obliged to worship God, had he equally<br />

bestowed these gifts on all men. God’s remark to Solomon (see 1 Kings<br />

3.12) that no one who came after him would be as wise as he is, seems to<br />

be merely an expression with which to stress his outstanding wisdom. In<br />

any case, one cannot believe that God promised him that he would not<br />

give as much happiness to anyone else after him, in order to make Solomon<br />

happier. For this would not in any way enhance Solomon’s understanding,<br />

and had God said he would give the same wisdom to everybody, that wise<br />

king would not have shown less gratitude to God for so great a gift.<br />

[2] Even so, though we say that Moses in the passages just cited from<br />

the Pentateuch spoke according to the understanding of the Hebrews, we<br />

do not mean to deny that God prescribed the laws of the Pentateuch to<br />

them alone or that he spoke only to them or that the Hebrews saw<br />

wonders that occurred to no other nation. We mean rather that Moses<br />

desired to teach the Hebrews in such a manner and inculcate into them<br />

such principles as would attach them more closely to the worship of<br />

God on the basis of their childish understanding. We also wanted to<br />

show that the Hebrews excelled other nations neither in knowledge nor<br />

piety but in something quite di¡erent, or (to speak in terms of Scripture,<br />

according to their understanding) that the Hebrews were chosen above<br />

others by God not, despite their being frequently admonished, with a<br />

view to the true life and elevated conceptions but rather for something<br />

completely di¡erent. What this was, I will show here directly.<br />

[3] But before I begin, I want to explain in a few words what I mean in<br />

what follows by ‘God’s direction’, by ‘God’s external and internal help’, by<br />

‘divine election’, and ¢nally what I mean by ‘fortune’. By ‘God’s direction’,<br />

I mean the ¢xed and unalterable order of nature or the interconnectedness<br />

46 of [all] natural things.We have shown above, and have previously demonstrated<br />

elsewhere, 1 that the universal laws of nature according to which all<br />

things happen and are determined, are nothing other than the eternal<br />

1 I.e., in the Cogitata metaphysica,the47-page text published by Spinoza, under his own name, as a<br />

supplement to his geometrical exposition of the principles of Descartes’ philosophy, entitled<br />

Renati Des Cartes, Principiorum philosophiae pars I & II, more geometrico demonstrata (Amsterdam,<br />

1663).<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!