28.01.2015 Views

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Apostles and prophets<br />

preach to everyone without exception and to convert all men to religion.<br />

Therefore wherever they might go, they were following the command of<br />

Christ. Moreover, they did not need to have what they were to preach<br />

revealed to them before they went, for they were disciples of Christ to<br />

whom he had said, ‘and when they deliver you up, do not be anxious<br />

how or what you will say; for what you will say will be given you in that<br />

hour,’ etc. (see Matthew 10.19^20).<br />

155<br />

[6] Hence, we conclude that the Apostles received by special revelation<br />

only what they preached with their own voices and, at the same time,<br />

con¢rmed by wonders (see what we demonstrated at the beginning of<br />

chapter 2). What they merely taught, either in writing or orally, without<br />

using signs as testimony, they spoke or wrote on the basis of knowledge<br />

(i.e. natural knowledge); on this see 1 Corinthians 14.6.<br />

It is no objection to this that all the Epistles begin with a con¢rmation<br />

that they are Apostles. For as I shall show presently, the Apostles received<br />

not just the power of prophecy but also authority to teach. It is in this<br />

sense that we allow that they wrote their Epistles as Apostles, and that<br />

this is the reason each of them starts his preface with a con¢rmation of<br />

his Apostleship. Or perhaps, to win their readers’ con¢dence more readily<br />

and seize their attention, they wanted above all to stress that they had<br />

won a reputation among all the faithful for their preaching and had also<br />

shown by plain testimony that they taught true religion and the way of<br />

salvation. For I ¢nd that whatever I see in these Epistles about the calling<br />

of the Apostles and their sacred and divine spirit, is ascribed to the<br />

preaching they had done, with the single exception of passages in which<br />

‘the spirit of God’ and ‘holy spirit’ are intended to mean a healthy and<br />

happy mind, a mind dedicated to God, etc. (as we explained in chapter 1).<br />

For example, in 1 Corinthians 7.40 Paul says,‘in my view, she is blessed if<br />

she remains as she is, and I think that the spirit of God is in me’. Here by<br />

‘spirit of God’ he means his own mind, as the context of the sentence<br />

indicates. What Paul is saying is: ‘I judge (‘‘in my view’’) that the widow<br />

who does not wish to marry a second time is blessed; for I am celibate<br />

myself by choice and consider myself to be blessed’. There are other passages<br />

like this that I do not think I need to cite here.<br />

Since we must conclude that the Apostles’ Epistles were composed<br />

using the natural light of reason alone, we should now ask how they could<br />

teach by means of natural knowledge alone things that are not within its<br />

159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!