28.01.2015 Views

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

BENEDICT DE SPINOZA: Theological-Political Treatise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

On the vocation of the Hebrews<br />

the uncircumcised obey the command of the law, their uncircumcision is<br />

regarded as circumcision’. Again 3.9 and 4.15 state that all men equally, that<br />

is, both Jews and gentiles, were under sin, but that there is no sin without<br />

commandment and law. It is entirely evident from this that the law has<br />

been revealed to everyone without exception (as we also proved above from<br />

Job 28.28), that all men have lived under it, and that this law is the law<br />

which aims at true virtue alone, and is not the law which is shaped by the<br />

form and constitution of one particular state and adapted to the character<br />

of a single people. Finally, Paul concludes that God is the God of all<br />

nations, that is, God is equally well-disposed to all, and all men are equally<br />

under law and sin, and that is why God sent his Christ to all nations, to free<br />

all men equally from the servitude of the law, so that they would no longer<br />

live good lives because the law so commanded, but from a ¢xed conviction<br />

of the mind.<br />

Hence Paul teaches exactly what we want to a⁄rm. When he says that<br />

‘the pronouncements of God were entrusted only to the Jews’, he must<br />

mean one of two things. He may mean that the laws were entrusted in<br />

writing only to the Jews and given to the rest of the nations by revelation<br />

and intuition alone. Or he may be adapting his reply to the understanding<br />

and beliefs of the Jews at that point in time (since he is striving to refute an<br />

objection that could only have come from Jews). For in order to proclaim<br />

what he had partly seen for himself and partly heard from others, he was<br />

prepared to be a Greekwith the Greeks and a Jew with the Jews. 8<br />

[11] It remains only to respond to some arguments by which certain<br />

people seek to persuade themselves that the election of the Jews was not 55<br />

temporal and applicable only to their commonwealth, but eternal.We see<br />

(they say) that, after the loss of their state, the Jews were scattered everywhere<br />

for so many years and separated from all nations, and yet they still<br />

survived, as no other nation has. The sacred books, we see also, seem to<br />

teach in many places that God has chosen the Jews for himself for ever, and<br />

therefore although they have lost their state, they still remain the chosen of<br />

God. The passages which they think show this eternal election most<br />

clearly are: (1) Jeremiah 31.36, where the prophet testi¢es that the seed of<br />

Israel will remain the people of God for ever and goes so far as to compare<br />

them with the ¢xed order of the heavens and of nature; (2) Ezekiel 20.32¡.,<br />

8 See 1 Corinthians 9.19^23.<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!