29.01.2015 Views

1fAWAwx

1fAWAwx

1fAWAwx

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

worker to become eligible based on his or her most recent earnings (rather<br />

than earnings in the previous calendar year) or when quitting a job because<br />

of certain circumstances (compelling family responsibilities, a relocating<br />

spouse, domestic violence, or sexual assault). Proposed reforms also<br />

included offering benefits to individuals seeking only part-time work and<br />

providing for a dependent allowance.<br />

Overall, states invested $3.5 billion of Recovery Act funds toward<br />

these modernization efforts. The law prompted 41 states to make nearly<br />

100 reforms to their unemployment insurance programs. Numerous states<br />

expanded eligibility to workers whose job loss was due to compelling family<br />

circumstances, with 13 states adding coverage for domestic violence,<br />

14 states adding coverage to care for a sick family member, and 16 states<br />

extending coverage to a relocating spouse.<br />

In February 2012, the President signed into law more reforms to<br />

unemployment insurance—many of which were originally proposed in the<br />

American Jobs Act—including measures to help the long-term unemployed<br />

get back to work. Specifically, the new law created opportunities for states<br />

to test new strategies to help the long-term unemployed find new work.<br />

The Administration also expanded “work-sharing” programs across the<br />

country, which will help prevent layoffs by encouraging struggling employers<br />

to reduce hours for workers rather than cut headcount. Additionally,<br />

for the first time, the reforms allowed the long-term unemployed who were<br />

receiving federal benefits to start their own businesses, while also providing<br />

support to states to expand entrepreneurship programs.<br />

Protecting the Most Vulnerable. The Recovery Act and subsequent<br />

legislation also included a range of proposals focused on protecting the<br />

most vulnerable. These measures included expanding the Earned Income<br />

Tax Credit (EITC) and the refundable portion of the child tax credit, both<br />

of which provide an additional reward to work for low-income families.<br />

The Administration also sought to ensure that the Making Work Pay<br />

credit was refundable, so that it benefited not just middle-class families but<br />

moderate-income working families as well. The Recovery Act expanded<br />

the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to help families<br />

through tough times while also providing emergency benefits through<br />

Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), including subsidies to<br />

encourage hiring of low-income parents. The Recovery Act also ended<br />

or prevented homelessness for over 1.3 million families through the<br />

Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Program.<br />

All told, the pre-existing social insurance system combined with<br />

the expansions in the Recovery Act and subsequent extensions were very<br />

effective in preventing a large rise in the poverty rate, despite a substantial<br />

The Economic Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Five Years Later | 121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!