29.01.2015 Views

1fAWAwx

1fAWAwx

1fAWAwx

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 2-1<br />

Mean GDP Growth, 2007–2013<br />

Percent change at an annual rate<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

-4<br />

4.9<br />

4.6<br />

3.3<br />

4.0 3.7<br />

2.8<br />

1.8<br />

2.2<br />

1.8<br />

0.2 0.6<br />

0.9<br />

1.6<br />

1.8<br />

1.0<br />

0.4 0.3<br />

-0.4<br />

-1.0<br />

-0.2<br />

-1.8<br />

2.5<br />

2.8<br />

1.8<br />

2013:Q4<br />

2.9<br />

2.4<br />

(GDP only)<br />

-6<br />

-8<br />

-7.9<br />

-5.8<br />

-10<br />

2007:Q1 2009:Q1 2011:Q1 2013:Q1<br />

Note: Mean real GDP growth is the average of the growth rates of real GDP and real gross domestic income<br />

(GDI). The bullets show mean GDP and the bars show the GDP and GDI growth in each quarter. The<br />

estimate for 2013:Q4 is for GDP only. Shading denotes recession.<br />

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, National Income and Product Accounts; CEA calculations.<br />

income- and product-side of real GDP (Figure 2-1).1 During the four quarters<br />

of the year, growth was strong in exports (4.9 percent) and in residential<br />

investment (6.6 percent), and moderate in business fixed investment (3.0<br />

percent) and consumer spending (2.1 percent). State and local purchases<br />

edged up slightly following four years of decline, while Federal spending fell<br />

6.2 percent.<br />

Fiscal Policy<br />

Federal fiscal policy evolved through several near- or after-deadline<br />

Congressional actions that made fiscal policy uncertain and created a difficult<br />

planning environment for businesses and consumers.<br />

Toward the end of 2012, policy focused on the potential negative<br />

effects of the “fiscal cliff,” a confluence of expiring tax cuts and scheduled<br />

spending declines that were on track to occur simultaneously, which might<br />

have resulted in a sharp fiscal-policy tightening on January 1, 2013. The<br />

Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that these policies, if allowed<br />

to occur, would have lowered real GDP growth by about 2.25 percent during<br />

1 Research shows that an average of the two growth rates is better correlated with a wide<br />

variety of economic indicators than either the product-side measure (which is headlined in the<br />

Commerce Department reports) or the income-side measure alone (Nalewaik 2010, Economic<br />

Report of the President 1997, pp. 72-74).<br />

The Year In Review And The Years Ahead | 47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!