29.01.2015 Views

1fAWAwx

1fAWAwx

1fAWAwx

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ecause of rapidly declining stock and house prices. This was much larger<br />

than the initial decline in wealth at the outset of the Great Depression.2<br />

Falling asset prices reduced the value of collateral and further restricted<br />

the availability of credit and, as credit dried up, many small businesses and<br />

even some large, well-known corporations reported trouble meeting basic<br />

expenses such as payroll. Faced with extraordinary uncertainty about the<br />

economic future, businesses stopped hiring, laid off workers, and shelved<br />

investment plans. As housing and financial wealth plummeted and concerns<br />

over job security mounted, consumers cut back on spending. The effect was<br />

immediate and drastic: in the fourth quarter of 2008, personal consumption<br />

expenditures fell by nearly 5 percent and private investment shrunk 31<br />

percent at an annual rate.<br />

Most economic forecasters underestimated the magnitude of the toll<br />

these shocks would take on the economy, in large part because the United<br />

States had not gone through a systemic financial crisis since the Great<br />

Depression. Forecasts made at the time were also subject to considerable<br />

uncertainty about the spillovers to the rest of the world, and about how<br />

the economy would respond to other macroeconomic policy interventions<br />

after the federal funds rate had already hit zero. As shown in Table 3-1, in<br />

December 2008, for example, the Blue Chip panel of economic forecasters<br />

projected that real GDP would fall at a 1.4 percent annual rate in the first half<br />

of 2009, less than half the 2.9 percent annualized rate of decline that actually<br />

occurred. Moreover, the Blue Chip panel of forecasters estimated that the<br />

unemployment rate would rise to 7.7 percent in the second quarter of 2009,<br />

well below the actual rate of 9.3 percent. Other indicators showed similarly<br />

large deteriorations relative to forecasts.<br />

Initial Policy Responses<br />

As the economy slid into recession, Congress and the Bush<br />

Administration enacted the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 in February.<br />

They designed the Act to counteract a short recession by providing temporary<br />

support to consumer spending, but it was not sufficient to reverse<br />

the emerging distress and, by design, did not have long-lasting effects. In<br />

fall 2008, as the initially mild recession turned into a full-blown financial<br />

crisis, the U.S. government mounted a coordinated emergency response to<br />

prevent a meltdown of the financial system.3 The Federal Reserve, which had<br />

progressively cut its federal funds target rate several times over the previous<br />

2 See Romer (2011).<br />

3 A comprehensive timeline of the policy actions taken by the U.S. government can be found<br />

on the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis website http://timeline.stlouisfed.org/<br />

94 | Chapter 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!