29.01.2015 Views

1fAWAwx

1fAWAwx

1fAWAwx

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and to set the stage for stronger future growth. Considerable evidence suggests<br />

the Federal Government’s efforts to jump-start the economy were<br />

successful. CEA estimates that the Recovery Act provided an important and<br />

timely boost to GDP in 2009 and 2010, and led to the creation of about 6.4<br />

million additional job-years through 2013—estimates that are in line with<br />

those of CBO and of other forecasting groups. Other fiscal efforts enacted<br />

subsequent to the Recovery Act brought the total to 8.8 million job-years.<br />

The Administration’s actions have been guided by the notion that fiscal<br />

support measures would only be needed for a temporary period, and this<br />

view is being borne out. Most temporary measures to support the economy<br />

expired in 2013, most notably the payroll tax cut. Businesses and households<br />

are now in far better shape as a result of several years of deleveraging, and<br />

private-sector growth has led the way since 2010. Although many challenges<br />

linger, and supportive measures like emergency unemployment insurance<br />

remain necessary given the unacceptably high rate of long-term unemployment,<br />

the economy has the potential for even stronger growth in 2014.<br />

Public policy, in particular public investment in areas like research,<br />

infrastructure, and innovation, will continue to play an important role in the<br />

economy. The President is proposing additional investments and reforms<br />

in all of these areas. But, in these cases, investments are part of a longerterm,<br />

sustained commitment to expanding the productive capacity of the<br />

economy without the same need for immediate countercyclical support.<br />

Overall, the Recovery Act and subsequent measures are one of the<br />

main reasons why the U.S. economy was able to return to record levels of per<br />

working-age population GDP within just over four years of the onset of the<br />

recession and to bring the unemployment rate down by 0.8 percentage point<br />

per year—when many other countries with systemic financial crises have not<br />

seen their GDP per working-age population fully recover or their unemployment<br />

rates start a sustained fall. In the longer run, the benefits of all of these<br />

efforts will be more difficult to isolate from other simultaneous changes,<br />

but they will be no less profound in terms of their cumulative impact on the<br />

economic well-being of the Nation.<br />

Appendix 1: Components of the Recovery<br />

Act and Subsequent Fiscal Measures<br />

Table 3-9 reports the actual budgetary impact of the Recovery Act<br />

from its inception through the latest data available (the end of fiscal year<br />

2013).<br />

Table 3-10 reports the budgetary impact classified into the six<br />

broad functional categories shown also in Figure 3-1: individual tax cuts,<br />

The Economic Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Five Years Later | 133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!