96 CHARACTERIZATION OF GEOLOGIC SEQUESTRATION OPPORTUNITIES IN THE <strong>MRCSP</strong> REGION fossiliferous, silt- and sand-sized grainstones, calcareous shales, and silty argillites; dark gray to black, medium bedded, cherty, silt-size grainstones with silty argillites and platy shales; and 4) terrigenous black shales interbedded with thin-bedded mudstones and calcarenites (Head, 1969). In south-central Pennsylvania, western Maryland, and northeastern West Virginia, the upper calcareous facies of the Helderberg (Licking Creek Limestone grades upward into the Oriskany Sandstone. Many drillers have difficulty separating the two, and the formational contact typically is placed at the base of the lowest arenaceous sequence. The Huntersville Chert is characterized as “variously . . . dark, noncacareous shale, carcareous silty shale, calcareous siltstone, argillaceous and silty or sandy limestone, and a subordinate amount of glauconitic or conglomeratic quartz sandstone” (Basan and others, 1980, p. 42). The sandy facies contains well-rounded quartz grains where the Huntersville lies directly on the Oriskany Sandstone. Thin argillaceous sandstone beds, phosphatic nodules, and glauconite occur in the basal Huntersville as well, indicating the presence of an erosional surface on the top of the Oriskany. The Onondaga Limestone in northern Ohio consists of lightcolored, micritic to coarse-grained, sparry, fossiliferous limestone with fairly abundant chert (Janssens, 1997). The color changes to medium-gray to black to the east. The Onondaga tends to be very argillaceous in the upper portion in places where the limestone grades upward into the organic-rich shales of the Marcellus or “lower” Olentangy formations (Van Tyne, 1996a). In central and western Ohio, the Columbus Limestone is about 215 feet thick and composed of gray to bluish-gray, partly crystalline, and cherty limestone. In the Michigan basin, the Lucas Formation is a siliceous (cherty) dolostone about 35 feet thick, which makes this formation especially distinguishable from the Onondaga and Columbus limestones (Janssens, 1997). The Jeffersonville Limestone of Indiana is brown to gray, dense to crystalline, thick-bedded, dolomitic limestone typically less than 50 feet thick (Patton and Dawson, in Murray, 1955). DISCUSSION OF DEPTH AND THICKNESS RANGES Figure A8-2.—Detailed stratigraphic column and geophysical log curves of the Niagaran thru Onondaga interval from a well in Columbiana County, eastern Ohio (from Mesolella, 1978). The Niagaran/Lockport thru Onondaga Interval is relatively shallow over the arches of the region, but attains greater depths in the basins (Figure A8-3). The top of the interval is mostly below 2,000 feet in the Michigan basin, whereas the base is below 8,000 feet in the deepest parts of that basin. In Indiana and western Ohio, the interval is quite shallow, straddling the Cincinnati arch and cropping out along either side of the arch. In the Appalachian basin, the top of the interval ranges from -1,000 feet along the Lake Erie shoreline, to -7,500 feet in south central Pennsylvania. The base ranges from -2,000 feet along Lake Erie to more than -10,000 feet in Somerset County, Pennsylvania (Figure A8-3). In eastern Kentucky several fields produce from this interval at depths of -2,000 to -2,500 feet, but most reservoirs, including the Big Sinking field, are shallower, with depths from -500 to -1,500 feet (Nuttall and others, 2003). The interval thickness ranges from 250 feet in eastern Kentucky and northern Indiana to more than 6,000 feet in the central part of the Michigan basin (Figure A8-4). Within the Appalachian basin, thickness increases northeastward from about 250 feet in eastern Kentucky to approximately 3,000 feet in central Pennsylvania and western Maryland. These dramatic increases in thickness result mainly from the large accumulations of carbonates and evaporites in the Salina Group. DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS/ PALEOGEOGRAPHY/TECTONISM Most of the environments represented in this heterolithic interval are normal or restricted marine facies. Intervals of evaporite deposition represent even greater restriction in local areas. The sandstones represent shallow marine or coastal settings (Smosna and Patchen, 1978). The carbonate rocks, in many cases, are influenced by the basin-fringing reef belts, with shallow tidal to supratidal deposits forming behind the reef systems, and deeper subtidal accumulations forming in the basinward settings. In some settings within the deeper portions of the basins, the rocks are very fine grained and rich in shale and clay.
A APPENDIX A: NIAGARAN/LOCKPORT THROUGH ONONDAGA INTERVAL 97 EXPLANATION CONTOUR 2500 ft Index contours 500 ft contours Mean sea elevation (feet) 500 -6500 -2500 0 A T S I L O U U R I T C R O O R A N P 0 -2500 -5000 I N S U F F I C I E N T D P R O J E C T O U T D O V I C R C L I I A N O P M I T -5000 50 25 0 50 100 Miles ³ 50 25 0 50 100 150 Kilometers Figure A8-3.—Structure contour map drawn on top of the Onondaga Limestone.
- Page 1 and 2:
Characterization of Geologic Seques
- Page 3 and 4:
ABOUT THE MRCSP The Midwest Regiona
- Page 5 and 6:
CONTENTS About the MRCSP ..........
- Page 7 and 8:
CONTENTS Figure A14-2.—Structure
- Page 9 and 10:
1 CHARACTERIZATION OF GEOLOGIC SEQU
- Page 11 and 12:
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 3 (a minimum
- Page 13 and 14:
INTRODUCTION TO THE MRCSP REGION’
- Page 15 and 16:
INTRODUCTION TO THE MRCSP REGION’
- Page 17 and 18:
INTRODUCTION TO THE MRCSP REGION’
- Page 19 and 20:
INTRODUCTION TO THE MRCSP REGION’
- Page 21 and 22:
GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROCEDURES, DATA S
- Page 23 and 24:
GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROCEDURES, DATA S
- Page 25 and 26:
GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROCEDURES, DATA S
- Page 27 and 28:
GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROCEDURES, DATA S
- Page 29 and 30:
GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROCEDURES, DATA S
- Page 31 and 32:
GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROCEDURES, DATA S
- Page 33 and 34:
GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROCEDURES, DATA S
- Page 35 and 36:
OIL, GAS, AND GAS STORAGE FIELDS 27
- Page 37 and 38:
OIL, GAS, AND GAS STORAGE FIELDS 29
- Page 39 and 40:
OIL, GAS, AND GAS STORAGE FIELDS 31
- Page 41 and 42:
CO 2-SEQUESTRATION STORAGE CAPACITY
- Page 43 and 44:
CO 2-SEQUESTRATION STORAGE CAPACITY
- Page 45 and 46:
CO 2-SEQUESTRATION STORAGE CAPACITY
- Page 47 and 48:
CO 2-SEQUESTRATION STORAGE CAPACITY
- Page 49 and 50:
CO 2-SEQUESTRATION STORAGE CAPACITY
- Page 51 and 52:
CO 2-SEQUESTRATION STORAGE CAPACITY
- Page 53 and 54: CONCLUSIONS AND REGIONAL ASSESSMENT
- Page 55 and 56: REFERENCES CITED 47 National Confer
- Page 57 and 58: 49 APPENDIX A Geologic Summaries of
- Page 59 and 60: APPENDIX A: PRECAMBRIAN UNCONFORMIT
- Page 61 and 62: APPENDIX A: CAMBRIAN BASAL SANDSTON
- Page 63 and 64: APPENDIX A: CAMBRIAN BASAL SANDSTON
- Page 65 and 66: APPENDIX A: CAMBRIAN BASAL SANDSTON
- Page 67 and 68: APPENDIX A: BASAL SANDSTONES TO TOP
- Page 69 and 70: APPENDIX A: BASAL SANDSTONES TO TOP
- Page 71 and 72: APPENDIX A: BASAL SANDSTONES TO TOP
- Page 73 and 74: APPENDIX A: UPPER CAMBRIAN ROSE RUN
- Page 75 and 76: APPENDIX A: UPPER CAMBRIAN ROSE RUN
- Page 77 and 78: APPENDIX A: UPPER CAMBRIAN ROSE RUN
- Page 79 and 80: APPENDIX A: UPPER CAMBRIAN ROSE RUN
- Page 81 and 82: APPENDIX A: KNOX TO LOWER SILURIAN
- Page 83 and 84: APPENDIX A: KNOX TO LOWER SILURIAN
- Page 85 and 86: APPENDIX A: KNOX TO LOWER SILURIAN
- Page 87 and 88: N T R APPENDIX A: KNOX TO LOWER SIL
- Page 89 and 90: APPENDIX A: MIDDLE ORDOVICIAN ST. P
- Page 91 and 92: -6000 -8000 APPENDIX A: MIDDLE ORDO
- Page 93 and 94: APPENDIX A: LOWER SILURIAN MEDINA G
- Page 95 and 96: APPENDIX A: LOWER SILURIAN MEDINA G
- Page 97 and 98: APPENDIX A: LOWER SILURIAN MEDINA G
- Page 99 and 100: APPENDIX A: LOWER SILURIAN MEDINA G
- Page 101 and 102: APPENDIX A: NIAGARAN/LOCKPORT THROU
- Page 103: APPENDIX A: NIAGARAN/LOCKPORT THROU
- Page 107 and 108: APPENDIX A: MIDDLE SILURIAN NIAGARA
- Page 109 and 110: -3000 APPENDIX A: MIDDLE SILURIAN N
- Page 111 and 112: APPENDIX A: LOWER DEVONIAN MANDATA
- Page 113 and 114: APPENDIX A: LOWER DEVONIAN ORISKANY
- Page 115 and 116: APPENDIX A: LOWER DEVONIAN ORISKANY
- Page 117 and 118: APPENDIX A: LOWER DEVONIAN ORISKANY
- Page 119 and 120: APPENDIX A: LOWER DEVONIAN ORISKANY
- Page 121 and 122: APPENDIX A: LOWER DEVONIAN SYLVANIA
- Page 123 and 124: -2000 APPENDIX A: LOWER DEVONIAN SY
- Page 125 and 126: 25 APPENDIX A: LOWER/MIDDLE DEVONIA
- Page 127 and 128: APPENDIX A: DEVONIAN ORGANIC-RICH S
- Page 129 and 130: APPENDIX A: DEVONIAN ORGANIC-RICH S
- Page 131 and 132: APPENDIX A: DEVONIAN ORGANIC-RICH S
- Page 133 and 134: APPENDIX A: DEVONIAN ORGANIC-RICH S
- Page 135 and 136: ( ( ( ( APPENDIX A: PENNSYLVANIAN C
- Page 137 and 138: APPENDIX A: PENNSYLVANIAN COAL BEDS
- Page 139 and 140: APPENDIX A: PENNSYLVANIAN COAL BEDS
- Page 141 and 142: APPENDIX A: PENNSYLVANIAN COAL BEDS
- Page 143 and 144: APPENDIX A: LOWER CRETACEOUS WASTE
- Page 145 and 146: APPENDIX A: LOWER CRETACEOUS WASTE
- Page 147 and 148: APPENDIX A: LOWER CRETACEOUS WASTE
- Page 149 and 150: APPENDIX A: LOWER CRETACEOUS WASTE
- Page 151 and 152: APPENDIX A: REFERENCES CITED 143 Sa
- Page 153 and 154: APPENDIX A: REFERENCES CITED 145 an
- Page 155 and 156:
APPENDIX A: REFERENCES CITED 147 lo
- Page 157 and 158:
APPENDIX A: REFERENCES CITED 149 Pa
- Page 159 and 160:
APPENDIX A: REFERENCES CITED 151 Th