30.01.2015 Views

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

90 CHARACTERIZATION OF GEOLOGIC SEQUESTRATION OPPORTUNITIES IN THE <strong>MRCSP</strong> REGION<br />

The Medina Group is comprised of interbedded sandstones,<br />

mudrocks, and some carbonates that were deposited under variable<br />

conditions (Laughrey, 1984; Laughrey and Harper, 1986; McCormac<br />

and others, 1996). As a result, this reservoir is heterogeneous<br />

because of variations in several rock characteristics, including grain<br />

size, type and degree of cementation, clay content, and pore geometry<br />

(McCormac and others, 1996). This is evidenced in the three<br />

major facies of this sequence, the Grimsby Formation, Cabot Head<br />

Shale, and Whirlpool Sandstone as described above. Due to these<br />

lithologic variations within the Medina Group, detailed characterization<br />

of this unit for injection potential needs to be performed at<br />

each prospective site.<br />

Figure A7-5 illustrates typical geophysical log curves for the<br />

Medina Group in the northern Appalachian basin. The gamma-ray<br />

signature demonstrates the relatively thick, sandy nature of the<br />

Grimsby, the increasing-upward siltstone/sandstone laminations<br />

within the Cabot Head Shale, and the abrupt, sandy signature of the<br />

Whirlpool Sandstone as it overlies the Queenston Formation. This<br />

gamma-ray response has been collectively referred to as a “broken<br />

sandstone” signature by Laughrey (1984).<br />

The porosity and permeability of the Medina Group varies due<br />

to both depositional and diagenetic processes. The deposition of<br />

mudrocks isolated sandy and silty layers of the Grimsby Sandstone<br />

and the upper Cabot Head Shale, creating permeability barriers<br />

between these reservoir rocks. Diagenesis has altered the relatively<br />

tight, primary porosity in the northern portion of the basin, creating<br />

two major types of secondary porosity, intergranular and moldic.<br />

The secondary intergranular porosity is the result of dissolution of<br />

primary calcite cement and grain edges, and moldic porosity is due<br />

to the corrosion of silica cement and dissolution of feldspar minerals<br />

(McCormac and others, 1996). However, diagenesis does not<br />

always enhance porosity in this reservoir. Secondary cementation<br />

by authigenic silica has been observed to reduce porosity, in some<br />

cases surrounding entire grains to destroy the primary porosity<br />

(Laughrey, 1984).<br />

Work performed by Laughrey (1984) in the Athens Field of Crawford<br />

County, Pennsylvania, identified several porosity types in the<br />

Medina Group, from relict, primary porosity to microporosity, intraconstituent<br />

porosity, and fracture porosity. The occurrence of fracture<br />

porosity in the Medina and equivalent units has been documented<br />

to a limited extent in other parts of the basin as well (McCormac<br />

and others, 1996). In northwestern Pennsylvania, Laughrey (1984)<br />

associated the highest porosity zones with those areas influenced by<br />

both depositional environment and diagenetic phenomena.<br />

Figure A7-5 illustrates typical porosity curves for the Medina<br />

Group in the northern part of the basin. The crossover between<br />

density porosity and neutron porosity curves is shown with light<br />

gray shading and indicates a gas effect in the porous zones in the<br />

Grimsby Sandstone, the transitional, silty sandstones of the Cabot<br />

Head Shale, and the Whirlpool Sandstone. Medina Group porosities<br />

range from 2 to 23 percent across the basin, and average 7.8 percent<br />

(McCormac and others, 1996).<br />

Medina Group permeabilities are widely variable, ranging from<br />

less than 0.1 md to 40 md (McCormac and others, 1996). In northwestern<br />

Pennsylvania, Medina permeabilities fall on the lower end<br />

of this range (Laughrey, 1984). Even so, the Perrysville Consolidated<br />

Field (Ashland County, Ohio) recorded average permeabilities of<br />

over 100 md, and isolated permeabilities of individual layers in this<br />

sequence can have permeabilities in excess of 200 md (McCormac<br />

and others, 1996).<br />

Brines in the Medina Group of Pennsylvania have salinity values<br />

ranging from approximately 95,000 to 280,000 parts per million<br />

(ppm). The primary components of these brines are calcium, sodium,<br />

and chloride, with lesser amounts of magnesium, strontium, po-<br />

Figure A7-5.—Gamma-ray and porosity geophysical log curves for the Madura #1 (API# 3708520801), a typical Medina gasproducing<br />

well in Mercer County, Pennsylvania. The gamma-ray response has been described as a “broken sandstone” signature,<br />

and the crossover of neutron porosity and density porosity curves illustrates a gas effect in the porous, gas-bearing zones of this<br />

sequence.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!