30.01.2015 Views

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 CHARACTERIZATION OF GEOLOGIC SEQUESTRATION OPPORTUNITIES IN THE <strong>MRCSP</strong> REGION<br />

2002). Such large volumes of gas storage capacity strongly suggest<br />

that CO 2 gas can be successfully managed in subsurface reservoirs<br />

within the region.<br />

In active oil fields, it has been demonstrated that CO 2 can be<br />

used for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). In this process, some of the<br />

oil that remains in reservoirs after primary production is recovered<br />

by injecting CO 2 that either (1) repressurizes the reservoir and displaces<br />

and drives the remaining oil to a recovery well (immiscible<br />

flooding) or (2) directly mixes and chemically interacts with the<br />

remaining oil as it pushes it to the producing well (miscible flooding).<br />

Approximately 70 oil fields worldwide currently inject CO 2<br />

for EOR (U.S. DOE, 2004) demonstrating the effectiveness of this<br />

value-added sequestration option. Moreover, enhanced oil recover,<br />

while sequestering CO 2, could provide an economic incentive to<br />

storage in several parts of the <strong>MRCSP</strong> region where CO 2 sources<br />

are near oil fields.<br />

Unmineable Coal Beds<br />

The <strong>MRCSP</strong> region includes the Appalachian basin, which contains<br />

the second- (West Virginia), third- (Kentucky), fourth- (Pennsylvania)<br />

and fourteenth- (Ohio) leading coal-producing states in<br />

the nation (EIA, 2005). Unmineable coal beds offer an alternative<br />

option for geologic sequestration in the region because, unlike the<br />

previously described reservoir types, CO 2 injected into a coal bed<br />

would not only occupy pore space, but would bond, or adsorb, onto<br />

the carbon in the coal itself. The adsorption ratio for CO 2 in coals<br />

is approximately twice that of methane; thus, in theory, the injected<br />

CO 2 would displace methane, allowing for the potential of enhanced<br />

gas recovery (Reznik and others, 1982; Gale and Freund, 2001;<br />

Schroeder and others, 2002). Because of the adsorption mechanism,<br />

concerns of miscibility that occur in oil and gas reservoirs are not an<br />

issue. Thus, the injection of CO 2 and resulting enhanced recovery of<br />

coalbed methane could occur at shallower depths than for depleted<br />

oil reservoirs. Hydrogeologic flow, water chemistry, coal thickness<br />

and quality, and subsurface temperature-pressure conditions are<br />

some of the variables that control the potential use of coal beds for<br />

CO 2 sequestration and enhanced coalbed-methane recovery (Pashin<br />

and others, 2003). Although there is currently only limited coalbed<br />

methane production in the <strong>MRCSP</strong> region, rising gas prices have<br />

led to growing interest in this energy resource in the last decade, and<br />

secondary recovery of methane may provide an economic incentive<br />

for sequestration of CO 2 from sources in the coal fields.<br />

Carbonaceous Shales<br />

The <strong>MRCSP</strong> region also contains widespread, thick deposits of<br />

carbonaceous shales. These shales are interesting in that they are<br />

often multifunctional—acting as seals for underlying reservoirs, as<br />

source rocks for oil and gas reservoirs, and as unconventional gas<br />

reservoirs themselves. Analogous to sequestration in coal beds, CO 2<br />

injection into unconventional carbonaceous shale reservoirs could<br />

be used to enhance existing gas production. As an added bonus, it<br />

is believed the carbonaceous shales would adsorb the CO 2 into the<br />

shale matrix, permitting long-term CO 2-storage, even at relatively<br />

shallow depths (Nuttall and others, 2005a).<br />

INTRODUCTION TO THE <strong>MRCSP</strong> REGION’S GEOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY<br />

GEOGRAPHY<br />

The seven-state <strong>MRCSP</strong> partnership is an enormous and economically<br />

diverse area of the United States that excess of 255,000 square<br />

miles in size (>662,000 square kilometers). The area considered for<br />

geologic sequestration (excluding the upper peninsula of Michigan<br />

and the Illinois basin portion of Indiana and Kentucky) contains<br />

over 201,000 square miles (501,000 square kilometers). The diverse<br />

topography, hydrology, and bedrock geology of the region present<br />

a variety of geologic sequestration options. Additionally, numerous<br />

environmental considerations will be needed in different parts of the<br />

seven-state region. The MRSCP region encompasses three major<br />

physiographic regions: 1) Atlantic Plain, including the Continental<br />

Shelf and Coastal Plain (Maryland); 2) the Appalachian Highlands,<br />

including the Piedmont Province (Maryland), Blue Ridge Province<br />

(Maryland, West Virginia), Valley and Ridge Province (Maryland,<br />

Pennsylvania, West Virginia), and Appalachian Plateaus Province<br />

(Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia); and the 3) Interior<br />

Plains, including the Interior Low Plateaus (Kentucky, Ohio) and<br />

Central Lowland (Indiana, Michigan, Ohio) (Figure 2).<br />

Bedrock is at or near the surface in much of the Appalachian<br />

Highlands and is covered by Quaternary-age sediments in the Atlantic<br />

Plain and in parts of the Interior Plains north of the Ohio River.<br />

Variable surface topography, climate, and sediment and bedrock<br />

types covering the area result in varied land uses, surface water, and<br />

ground water conditions across the seven states.<br />

GENERAL GEOLOGY, MAJOR STRUCTURAL<br />

FEATURES AND TARGET AREAS<br />

Because the four reservoir classes being considered under this<br />

task all occur in sedimentary rocks, only those areas within the seven<br />

states with thickness of sedimentary rocks considered adequate<br />

for CO 2 sequestration were evaluated for their geologic sequestration<br />

potential. This differs from the terrestrial sequestration portion<br />

of the <strong>MRCSP</strong> project, which examined the entire land-surface area<br />

of the seven-state region. Also, although sedimentary rocks of appropriate<br />

thickness occur in a large part of the <strong>MRCSP</strong> region, the<br />

types and depths of potential CO 2 reservoir strata vary. Figure 3 is a<br />

generalized map of the geologic units at or near the surface that also<br />

shows the major geologic structures of the region. Figure 4 is a cross<br />

section across the map illustrating the sedimentary rocks thicken<br />

into geologic basins and thin above structural arches.<br />

Much of the Appalachian highlands, from the Piedmont on the<br />

east to the Allegheny front on the west, were not included in this<br />

investigation because they are dominated by folded and faulted<br />

metamorphic and igneous rocks. Additionally, it was not possible,<br />

within the scale of this project, to map most of the local sedimentary<br />

deposits within this folded section of the Appalachian Mountains<br />

because of a lack of data on the depth and thickness of individual<br />

units. Likewise, the Upper Peninsula of Michigan was not included<br />

in the geologic assessment of CO 2 sequestration potential because<br />

it consists mostly of metamorphic and igneous rocks. Although<br />

a small area of sedimentary rocks, considered to be a part of the<br />

Michigan basin, does exist in the Upper Peninsula, these rocks do<br />

not obtain depths great enough for consideration as a geologic sequestration<br />

target and were not included in this study.<br />

The eastern limit of <strong>MRCSP</strong> geologic investigations is the Maryland<br />

shoreline. Although many offshore sedimentary rocks may<br />

have a potential for sequestration, they were not investigated in<br />

this project. The western boundary for geologic mapping within the<br />

<strong>MRCSP</strong> region is a multi-county boundary that represents the ap-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!