30.01.2015 Views

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIX A: DEVONIAN ORGANIC-RICH SHALES<br />

121<br />

DISCUSSION OF DEPTH AND THICKNESS RANGES<br />

The maximum drilling depths for Devonian shales in the Appalachian<br />

basin occur in West Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania<br />

close to the Allegheny Front. In south-central Pennsylvania,<br />

western Maryland, and northeastern West Virginia, the base of the<br />

shale sequence often exceeds 8,000 or 9,000 feet (Matthews, 1983).<br />

However, in eastern Kentucky, southern and southwestern Ohio,<br />

and western West Virginia where most Devonian shale drilling and<br />

production has taken place, depths are in the 2,000 to 3,000 feet<br />

range (Figure A14-2). In general, the Devonian shales increase in<br />

thickness eastward from the outcrop in Kentucky and Ohio and<br />

southeastward from Lake Erie to the Allegheny Front. Thicknesses<br />

range from zero feet in some areas of central Kentucky (southwestern-most<br />

extent of the <strong>MRCSP</strong> study area) to more than 8,000 feet<br />

in south-central Pennsylvania (Matthews, 1983) (Figure A14-3). In<br />

the Ohio and northern Kentucky region, the unit maintains a relative<br />

consistent eastward increase in thickness from about 200 feet at the<br />

outcrop to more than 3,000 feet.<br />

In the Michigan basin, the Antrim crops out around the margin of<br />

the basin, but is often concealed by overlying glacial deposits. Drilling<br />

depths exceed 3,000 feet in Osceola County, central Michigan.<br />

The Antrim thickness exceeds 650 feet in central and northwestern<br />

lower Michigan (Matthews, 1993).<br />

DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS/<br />

PALEOGEOGRAPHY/TECTONISM<br />

The depositional environments of the Devonian shales in the Appalachian<br />

and Michigan basins are considered transgressive basinfill<br />

sequences related to active subsidence and tectonism. The Ohio<br />

Shale depositional sequence was summarized by Potter and others<br />

(1981), Hamilton-Smith (1993), and Boswell (1996), . The shales<br />

were deposited in a shallow to deep foreland basin setting west of<br />

the active Acadian orogenic belt. Rapid transgression following the<br />

Middle Devonian unconformity resulted in sediment covering the<br />

Cincinnati and Findlay arches. The Bellefontaine outlier in western<br />

Ohio is the only remaining evidence for deposition on these structural<br />

highs (Swinford and Slucher, 1995). Controls on the preservation<br />

and distribution of organic matter continue to be debated,<br />

but the organics most likely accumulated under dysoxic to anoxic<br />

marine conditions. During initial basin subsidence, black shales accumulated<br />

under low energy conditions in a euxinic basin across the<br />

region, far from the Acadian orogeny and associated Catskill delta<br />

deposits. As active tectonism diminished, the black shales were replaced<br />

with prograding, gray clastic-rich sediments of the Chagrin/<br />

Brallier facies, distal deposits associated with the Catskill deltaic<br />

sequence. Gray shales and siltstones of the Chagrin and Brallier thin<br />

westward and southwestward, and were deposited by far reaching<br />

turbidity currents from the Catskill delta. Sediment supply from the<br />

Chagrin and Brallier exceeded subsidence of the Appalachian basin,<br />

thus effectively eliminating the anoxic environments required for<br />

black shale deposition.<br />

The Michigan basin formed in multiple stages throughout the<br />

Paleozoic Era, but originated in an extensional regime during Late<br />

Precambrian rifting. Faulting, fracture development, growth of<br />

anticlinal structures, and regional basin subsidence occurred periodically<br />

throughout the Paleozoic, especially during major orogenic<br />

events on the eastern margin of the continent (Howell and van der<br />

Pluijm, 1999). In late Devonian through early Mississippian time,<br />

the fault-bounded Precambrian rift basin was reactivated during the<br />

Alleghanian orogeny causing a period of thermal subsidence yielding<br />

a classic sag basin (Catacosinos and others, 1990).<br />

Gamma-ray log response is key to stratigraphic analysis of the<br />

Devonian shales. Figure A14-4 illustrates the variation of gammaray<br />

tool response within the Devonian shale of the Big Sandy gas<br />

field, eastern Kentucky. Gray shales exhibit a gamma-ray response<br />

of 200 or more API units. In the more organic-rich black shales, the<br />

gamma-ray response exceeds 280 API units and may exceed 600 API<br />

units. Organic carbon content of the shale has been correlated to the<br />

uranium content (Potter and others, 1981). Schmoker (1993) demonstrated<br />

the relationship between log response and organic content.<br />

SUITABILITY AS A CO 2<br />

INJECTION TARGET OR SEAL UNIT<br />

The suitability of the Devonian shales for CO 2 injection and sequestration<br />

has not been demonstrated, but should be considered in<br />

areas where the geologic controls are well known and predictable.<br />

The following examples support this hypothesis. It is most commonly<br />

assumed that the very low permeability (in the microdarcy range)<br />

makes shales more generally appropriate as a sealing unit. However,<br />

in the San Juan basin, CO 2 injection has been successfully demonstrated<br />

in coals, another organic-rich, low permeability, continuous,<br />

fractured reservoir. The similar behavior of gas production from the<br />

Devonian shales as compared to CBM indicates they may also serve<br />

as sequestration targets. Natural fracturing plays an important role<br />

in development of the shales as both a gas producing reservoir and<br />

a possible sequestration target. Methane adsorbed on organic matter<br />

and clay mineral surfaces (Hamilton-Smith, 1993) desorbs as reservoir<br />

pressure declines, thus theoretically creating potential new adsorption<br />

sites. Matrix porosity and organic matter content ultimately<br />

control the total volume of gas trapped in the shale. Permeability<br />

controls the diffusion rate of desorbed methane through that matrix.<br />

It is in the fracture system that flow measured in darcies dominates,<br />

facilitating the production of natural gas. In general, production in<br />

more highly fractured areas exhibits a relatively rapid decline as free<br />

gas in the fracture system is depleted, followed by an often decadeslong<br />

period of steady production controlled by the rate of methane<br />

desorption and diffusion through the fracture system. In areas with a<br />

less extensive fracture network, production often increases to reach<br />

a plateau of steady production analogous to CBM production history.<br />

Current research by Nuttall and others (2005) demonstrates a<br />

CO 2 adsorption capacity averaging 42.9 standard cubic feet per ton<br />

(scf/t) of shale (at expected reservoir pressures of 400 psi). Results<br />

from experiments to test the diffusion rate of CO 2 through the shale<br />

and any associated displacement of methane are currently being<br />

interpreted. Research to model shale gas production histories and<br />

investigate CO 2 injection is also needed.<br />

Available reservoir pressure and temperature data indicates that<br />

CO 2 can be injected as a gas in these organic-rich reservoirs. It is<br />

expected that the fractured black shale intervals will trap CO 2 adsorbed<br />

onto the surfaces of organic matter and clay minerals. The<br />

gray shale intervals, relatively lacking in organic matter and less<br />

fractured, are more likely to serve as permeability barriers or reservoir<br />

seals. To evaluate the opportunity for an effective reservoir<br />

seal, those areas where the shale is either very thick or at drilling<br />

depths of at least 1,000 feet need to be assessed. In those areas,<br />

where the shale is often gas productive, overlying Mississippian and<br />

Pennsylvanian shales and other impermeable units are anticipated to<br />

provide secondary sealing capacity.<br />

The Devonian shales are expected to be most suitable as a sequestration<br />

target where they are sufficiently deep, thick, organicrich,<br />

and fractured; that is, in the best shale gas producing areas.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!