30.01.2015 Views

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIX A: LOWER DEVONIAN SYLVANIA SANDSTONE<br />

113<br />

any other formations within the northern Appalachian basin (AGA,<br />

2001). At least 32 gas storage fields are found within the Oriskany,<br />

with a combined storage capacity of nearly 1 TCF, and located in<br />

pinchout, stratigraphic, and structural traps (Table A11-1). Many of<br />

these storage fields have been in operation since the 1950s, attesting<br />

to the integrity of the fields and seals.<br />

In all likelihood the Oriskany Sandstone would make a suitable<br />

target for storage of CO 2-miscible fluids, but only after thorough<br />

evaluation of the formation at potential target sites. Such target sites<br />

include: 1) zones of high porosity and high permeability associated<br />

with updip sandstone pinchout, typical of eastern Ohio, and along<br />

the southern and eastern boundaries of the “Oriskany no-sand area”<br />

in northwestern Pennsylvania; 2) areas of highly fractured Oriskany<br />

Sandstone associated with salt solution and migration within<br />

the central depositional area of western Pennsylvania and central<br />

West Virginia; and 3) areas of intensely faulted and multi-tiered<br />

(duplexed) Oriskany Sandstone in the Valley and Ridge of central<br />

Pennsylvania, western Maryland, and eastern West Virginia.<br />

12. LOWER DEVONIAN SYLVANIA SANDSTONE<br />

The Sylvania Sandstone, late Early Devonian in age, is a<br />

quartzose sandstone that grades laterally into sandy limestone<br />

and dolostone in parts of the Michigan basin. The Sylvania is the<br />

basal formation of the Detroit River Group and, along with the<br />

Bois Blanc and Garden Island Formations, overlie the Kaskaskia<br />

unconformity (Figure 5). Gardner (1974) suggests the lower part of<br />

the Sylvania may be in facies relationship with the underlying Bois<br />

Blanc, especially in northern and western regions of the Michigan<br />

basin. However, the relationship of this lower contact is poorly<br />

documented, and the recent revision of the Michigan stratigraphic<br />

column by the Michigan <strong>Geologic</strong>al Survey shows an unconformity<br />

between the Sylvania and Bois Blanc Formations. The upper<br />

part of the Sylvania intertongues with carbonates of the overlying<br />

Amherstburg Formation, another unit in the Detroit River Group.<br />

Although arenaceous units are present at various stratigraphic<br />

positions above the Kaskaskia unconformity in Michigan, as well<br />

as in the Appalachian basin portion of the <strong>MRCSP</strong> study area—for<br />

example the Oriskany Sandstone in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West<br />

Virginia—use of the name Sylvania Sandstone should be restricted<br />

to the sandstone that occurs at the base of the Detroit River Group in<br />

the Michigan basin (Fisher and others, 1988). In general, details on<br />

the vertical and lateral stratigraphic relationships of the Sylvania, its<br />

internal lithologic variations, and those attributes making it suitable<br />

as a geologic reservoir for CO 2 sequestration, are uncertain for most<br />

of the Michigan basin.<br />

ORIGIN OF NAMES, TYPE SECTION,<br />

SIGNIFICANT EARLIER STUDIES<br />

Orton (1888) applied the name Sylvania Sandstone to exposures,<br />

incorrectly identified as Oriskany by Newberry (1871),<br />

in Sylvania Township, Lucas County, Ohio. Other significant<br />

investigations on the Sylvania include Grabau and Sherzer (1910),<br />

Alty (1933), Carman (1936), and Hatfield and others (1968). Also,<br />

Gardner (1974), as part of a detailed subsurface study, presented<br />

regional isopach and lithofacies maps of the Sylvania Sandstone<br />

in Michigan.<br />

NATURE OF LOWER AND UPPER CONTACTS<br />

The Sylvania Sandstone overlies the Kaskaskia unconformity<br />

in southeastern Michigan above the truncated Silurian-age Bass<br />

Islands Group. The Sylvania is thin, discontinuous, or completely<br />

absent in some areas, especially on the southern and western margins<br />

of the Michigan basin. Typically the Bois Blanc underlies<br />

the Sylvania although the exact stratigraphic relationship between<br />

these two units is unclear. The lateral extent and isopach pattern of<br />

the Sylvania Sandstone (Figure A12-1) and Bois Blanc Formation<br />

suggests a northwest- to southeast-trending shallow marine basin<br />

existed in the area at the time of deposition of the Sylvania (Gardner,<br />

1974). This basin may be related to the trend of the Mid-Michigan<br />

rift (Figure 6). The Sylvania Sandstone is the basal unit of the Detroit<br />

River Group; its upper contact with the overlying Amherstburg<br />

Formation is gradational and intertonguing.<br />

LITHOLOGY<br />

Regional lithologic variations within the Sylvania Sandstone<br />

are known mainly from the analysis of geophysical logs (Gardner,<br />

1974). These analyses suggest the Sylvania Sandstone typically<br />

consists of dolomitic to cherty, fine- to medium-grained, well-sorted<br />

and rounded, quartzose sandstone in central and southeastern lower<br />

Michigan but grades into cherty, sandy carbonate in other regions<br />

of the Michigan basin. Carbonate interbeds, sometimes containing<br />

chert, are common throughout the unit. The Sylvania, in general, is<br />

very porous in outcrops and in materials recovered from shallow<br />

subsurface cores and exploratory drill holes, particularly in southeastern<br />

lower Michigan. Locally, quartz overgrowths and carbonate<br />

cement are present in the unit. Most quartz sand grains of the Sylvania<br />

are frosted and pitted. Marine fossils, mainly brachiopods, are<br />

common in many of the calcareous interbeds. Cross beds and other<br />

current-induced sedimentary structures are common in outcrops but<br />

rarely observed in cores.<br />

DISCUSSION OF DEPTH AND THICKNESS RANGES<br />

The Sylvania Sandstone ranges from just a few feet thick in<br />

northeastern and southwestern areas of the Michigan basin to a maximum<br />

thickness of about 350 feet; the area of maximum thickness<br />

occurs mostly along a northwest- to southeast-trending belt across<br />

the central portion of the basin (Figure A12-1). These thickness<br />

estimates are based on geophysical log picks but are problematic<br />

due to the complex lithologic variations above, below, and within<br />

the geologic interval containing the Sylvania. As previously noted,<br />

the northwest- to southeast-oriented isopach pattern is similar to the<br />

underlying Bois Blanc Formation, suggesting a similar depositional<br />

and structural setting for both units. Moreover, the area of maximum<br />

thickness of the Sylvania closely mimics the eastern margin of the<br />

Mid-Michigan rift, a feature interpreted as a pre-Paleozoic age failed<br />

continental rift. Structural movement resulting from reactivation of<br />

parts of the rift may have influenced depositional trends within the<br />

Sylvania. These structures may have created basin topography/bathymetry<br />

that existed during the transgressive phase of Lower and<br />

Middle Devonian sediments that were deposited on top of the Kaskaskia<br />

unconformity. The Sylvania Sandstone ranges in depth from<br />

in excess of 400 feet above sea level in the southeastern corner of<br />

the state to over 4,400 feet below sea level in the central portion of<br />

the basin (Figure A12-2).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!