MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...
MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...
MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
APPENDIX A: MIDDLE SILURIAN NIAGARA GROUP REEFS<br />
99<br />
SUITABILITY AS A CO 2<br />
INJECTION TARGET OR SEAL UNIT<br />
The Niagaran/Lockport through Onondaga Interval is a major<br />
confining unit for CO 2 sequestration in the <strong>MRCSP</strong> study area.<br />
Because of the thickness and combination of lithologies, it should<br />
prove to be a very effective seal. The carbonates, in general, have<br />
very low porosity and permeability, except in certain units. Similarly,<br />
the great thicknesses of evaporites within this interval have<br />
low permeabilities that should provide an effective seal against<br />
migration of fluids away from lower intervals (such as the Lower<br />
Silurian Medina Group/”Clinton” Sandstone). However, Silurian<br />
and Middle Devonian dolomitized carbonates represent noteworthy<br />
potential sequestration targets in this interval because of significant<br />
porosity development within these units. Some oil and gas fields<br />
have produced from these dolostones, and some Class II injection<br />
wells utilize them. Sandstones in the Lower and Middle Devonian<br />
(Oriskany and Sylvania) could also be important sequestration targets.<br />
The organic-rich Mandata and Needmore shales might also<br />
have potential for sequestration, but this has yet to be determined.<br />
During the <strong>MRCSP</strong> <strong>Phase</strong> I study, five potential sequestration units<br />
from this overall interval, the Niagaran Reefs, Mandata Shale, Oriskany<br />
Sandstone, Needmore Shale, and Sylvania Sandstone, were<br />
mapped separately, and each is discussed in more detail in other<br />
sections of this report. During the <strong>MRCSP</strong> <strong>Phase</strong> II investigation,<br />
we plan to devote additional study to the Lockport Dolomite and<br />
Bass Islands Dolomite, as both appear to have significant, if local,<br />
sequestration potential.<br />
The Lockport Dolomite has numerous stratigraphic and combination<br />
structural-stratigraphic traps developed in porous patch<br />
reef bioherms or skeletal sand shoals encased in impermeable<br />
argillaceous dolostone (Noger and others, 1996). Local traps also<br />
occur where porosity and permeability pinch out along the flanks<br />
of structures. Porosity development in the Lockport is controlled<br />
primarily by depositional facies and diagenetic history. Patch reef<br />
bioherms and sand shoals have average log-calculated porosities of<br />
8 to 10 percent in producing oil and gas fields, with maximum porosities<br />
as high as 14 percent (Noger and others, 1996). In addition<br />
to moldic, vuggy, interparticle, and intercrystalline porosities, fracture<br />
porosity and permeability enhance production from producing<br />
fields, and should allow for maximum sequestration of miscible CO 2<br />
fluids. Seals for trapping fluids within the formation are provided by<br />
internal impermeable mudstones and the overlying evaporites and<br />
carbonates of the Salina Group.<br />
Caverns within the Salina Group salt units in Michigan and Ohio<br />
may have potential for sequestration of CO 2. Such caverns are currently<br />
used for underground storage of natural gas liquids. In Ohio,<br />
underground storage of hydrocarbons in Salina salt deposits began in<br />
1960. Thirty wells have been permitted for hydrocarbon storage since<br />
1960, but only 11 wells have been used (Tomastik, 2001). Of these<br />
11 wells, only two wells are currently operating. The main products<br />
stored in these wells are butane and propane. There are currently two<br />
active Salina Group salt mines in Cuyahoga and Lake Counties, Ohio<br />
(Figure A8-1) at depths of approximately 2,000 feet. Salt mines in<br />
Michigan and Ohio may also represent some sequestration potential,<br />
although most are not deep enough to achieve supercritical phase.<br />
Approximately 224 salt solution-mining wells have been drilled and<br />
completed in the Salina since the late 1890s in Ohio. Two facilities<br />
with 44 active wells remain open. Depths to the Salina Group<br />
salt beds in these wells range from 1,800 to 3,150 feet (Tomastik,<br />
1997). In West Virginia, there are three solution mining areas: 1) on<br />
the Pleasants/Tyler County line; in southwestern Marshall County;<br />
and 3) in west-central Marshall County (Figure A8-1). Two of these<br />
are currently active (the northern most one in Marshall County is<br />
abandoned). Depths to the Salina range from 6,200 to 6,900 feet in<br />
these wells. One salt-solution well has been drilled in north-central<br />
Pennsylvania with the purpose of using it to store natural gas. However,<br />
solution mining of the salt cavity has not been accomplished to<br />
date because the project is currently tied up in litigation. However,<br />
the great thickness of bedded salt in north-central Pennsylvania, at<br />
depths greater than 7,500 feet, indicates the Salina Group could be a<br />
valuable injection target in this part of the <strong>MRCSP</strong> study area.<br />
The Upper Silurian Bass Islands Dolomite could also be useful<br />
for sequestering CO 2. Reservoir quality typically occurs where the<br />
dolostone is highly fractured, as in the “Bass Islands trend” of New<br />
York and Pennsylvania (Van Tyne, 1996b). Little is known about the<br />
specifics of porosity and permeability, other than gross generalizations<br />
about fracture porosity. One pool in Erie County, Pennsylvania<br />
provides most of the details on the “Bass Islands trend.” Porosity,<br />
as measured on geophysical logs, ranged from 2 to 15 percent,<br />
averaging 10 percent. Occasionally, however, the Bass Islands<br />
has potential reservoir quality outside of such fractured areas, as<br />
provided by anecdotal information. In the early 1980s, a disposal<br />
well in northwestern Pennsylvania was investigated for problems of<br />
leakage in the annulus. The disposal formation was Upper Cambrian<br />
sandstone (Rose Run), but the fluids were migrating uphole into the<br />
Bass Islands Dolomite where they spread out into the surrounding<br />
region through cavernous porosity within the dolostone. Disposal<br />
fluid was found five miles away, leaking through an old, unplugged<br />
well in Lake Erie. It is unfortunate that the Bass Islands in this area<br />
is very shallow (only 1,700 feet in the disposal well). However, investigation<br />
of the Bass Islands Dolomite at depths below 2,500 feet<br />
would prove valuable in looking for potential sequestration targets<br />
within the dolostone.<br />
9. LOWER SILURIAN NIAGARA GROUP REEFS<br />
The Niagara Group (includes Lockport Dolomite) is early Silurian<br />
(Niagaran) in age and characterized by the development of individual<br />
“pinnacle” reefs and reef complexes along two linear trends,<br />
one in the northern part of the Michigan basin, the other along the<br />
southern part of the basin. Overall, the reef belt both contain pinnacle<br />
and barrier reef complexes, is mostly in the lower peninsula<br />
of Michigan but does extend into northeastern-most Illinois and<br />
northernmost Indiana and Ohio. Individual pinnacle reefs and reef<br />
complexes (averaging 50 to 400 acres in areal extent) are numerous,<br />
extending along linear belts approximately 6 to 15-miles wide<br />
in the northern reef belt and up to 20-miles wide in the southern<br />
part of the Michigan basin. Currently, there are approximately 800<br />
pinnacle reefs and reef complexes (fields) identified in the northern<br />
trend with an additional 400 in the southern trend. Productive reef<br />
intervals range from approximately 50 to 700 feet in thickness.<br />
ORIGIN OF NAMES, TYPE SECTION, SIGNIFICANT<br />
EARLIER STUDIES ON THIS INTERVAL<br />
Hall (1840) named the Niagara for exposures in the Niagara Falls,<br />
New York region. There have been numerous studies discussing the<br />
various stratigraphic aspects of the Silurian reefs in the region (for<br />
examples, see Droste and Shaver, 1985; Shaver and Sunderman,<br />
1989; Shaver, 1991, 1996). Likewise, there have been numerous