MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...
MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...
MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
116 CHARACTERIZATION OF GEOLOGIC SEQUESTRATION OPPORTUNITIES IN THE <strong>MRCSP</strong> REGION<br />
DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS/<br />
PALEOGEOGRAPHY/TECTONISM<br />
The Sylvania Sandstone represents the initial transgressive phase<br />
of an extensive Devonian-age carbonate sequence—the Detroit<br />
River Group—that was deposited over the regionally extensive<br />
Kaskaskia unconformity. The rounded and frosted quartz grains,<br />
common in many parts of the Sylvania, are characteristic of sand deposited<br />
in eolian environments or at least sand reworked from older<br />
eolian rocks. However, the presence of marine fossils and interbeds<br />
of sandstone within adjacent carbonates suggest a predominantly,<br />
if not entirely, shallow marine environment. Hatfield and others<br />
(1968) concluded the Sylvania was most likely a beach deposit that<br />
formed during a eustatic transgression.<br />
SUITABILITY AS A CO 2<br />
INJECTION TARGET OR SEAL UNIT<br />
The sandstone-dominated facies of the Sylvania Sandstone, best<br />
developed in central and southeastern lower Michigan, have been<br />
used for Class 2 waste-disposal wells and is also a major source for<br />
brine in industrial-mineral wells for the chemical industry in Midland<br />
County (Fisher and others, 1988). Porosity and horizontal permeability<br />
measurements from 24 sidewall-core samples from the Sylvania,<br />
collected in a well in southeastern lower Michigan, ranged from 1<br />
to 28 percent porosity with an average of 16.6 percent. Permeability<br />
measurements ranged from 0 to 388 md with an average of nearly 100<br />
md. These measurements are consistent with porosity and permeability<br />
characteristics presented herein. The primary doubts concerning<br />
the suitability of the Sylvania for CO 2 injection centers mostly on the<br />
unknown variability of the lithofacies and their distribution throughout<br />
the Michigan basin. Subsurface analysis of general lithofacies<br />
patterns indicates the sandstone-dominated facies in southeastern and<br />
central areas of the Michigan basin are replaced by mainly cherty<br />
carbonate facies in other regions. The chert-dominated lithofacies is<br />
likely to be porous, and also tripolitic, thereby significantly affecting<br />
the injectivity potential of the unit. Thus, a more detailed analysis of<br />
variations of the internal facies and rock properties of the Sylvania<br />
warrant additional investigation in order to further understand the<br />
CO 2 sequestration potential of the unit. In the central portion of the<br />
Michigan basin, the geologically older and potential sequestration<br />
reservoirs of the Mt. Simon and St. Peter Sandstones are very deep<br />
(thus expensive to drill). This great depth may not be advantageous<br />
for the occurrence of zones of high porosity and permeability for<br />
injection of CO 2 within these older units. In contrast, the Sylvania<br />
in much of this same central basin area is fairly thick and occurs at<br />
a moderate depth that may be more favorable for development of<br />
porosity and permeability ample for CO 2 sequestration.<br />
The Amherstburg Formation, a complex succession of evaporites<br />
and carbonates in the Detroit River Group, everywhere overlies the<br />
Sylvania Sandstone. Gardner (1974) suggests the continuity and<br />
integrity of Amherstburg Formation is variable; thus, its ability to<br />
function as a seal for the Sylvania in the Michigan basin is undetermined.<br />
However, overlying the Amherstburg are evaporates of<br />
the Lucas Formation, the Dundee Limestone, the Traverse Group<br />
(shale and limestone), and the Antrim Shale. This combined package<br />
should provide an adequate seal to insure integrity to Sylvania<br />
Sandstone injection reservoirs.<br />
13. LOWER/MIDDLE DEVONIAN NEEDMORE SHALE<br />
The Needmore Shale is present throughout western Maryland,<br />
south-central Pennsylvania, and eastern West Virginia; the upper<br />
part of the Needmore is laterally equivalent to the Onondaga Limestone<br />
in northern Pennsylvania and New York, and to the Huntersville<br />
Chert in western Pennsylvania and West Virginia (Figure 5).<br />
The Needmore Shale is underlain by the Early Devonian Oriskany<br />
Sandstone and overlain by the Middle Devonian Onondaga Limestone,<br />
Huntersville Chert, or Tioga Bentonite, depending upon the<br />
location within the Appalachian basin.<br />
Conodont biostratigraphy indicates that the Needmore Shale is of<br />
Early and earliest Middle Devonian age. Conodonts from the overlying<br />
Tioga Ash Bed suggest that the top of the Needmore is within<br />
the Polygnathus costatus costatus Zone of Middle Devonian age.<br />
(Harris and others, 1994)<br />
ORIGIN OF NAMES, TYPE SECTION, SIGNIFICANT<br />
EARLIER STUDIES ON THIS INTERVAL<br />
The Needmore Shale is named for exposures in southern Fulton<br />
County, Pennsylvania (Willard and Cleaves, 1939). The name was<br />
extended into Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia by Woodward<br />
(1943). This unit was later assigned as a member of the Romney<br />
Shale (Lesure, 1957) and the Onondaga Formation, but currently is<br />
formational in status.<br />
NATURE OF LOWER AND UPPER CONTACTS<br />
The contact between the Needmore Shale and the underlying<br />
Oriskany Sandstone is sharp and unconformable, representing either<br />
a transgressive surface or a transgressive surface/unconformity<br />
converged (G.R. Baum, personal communication, 2005). The<br />
Needmore Shale grades laterally into the Huntersville Chert and,<br />
upsection, into dark gray, argillaceous limestones of the Onondaga<br />
Limestone. In the absence of the Huntersville Chert and the Onondaga<br />
Limestone facies, there is a 10- to 15-foot interval of coarse,<br />
brown shale mixed with considerable volcanic ash termed the Tioga<br />
Bentonite at the top of the Needmore Shale.<br />
LITHOLOGY<br />
The Needmore Shale is a dense, fissile, dark olive-gray to black,<br />
calcareous shale with dark gray interbeds of thin-bedded and nodular,<br />
fossiliferous, argillaceous limestone. Dark gray volcanic tuffs<br />
and ash beds occur at the top of the formation (Glaser, 2004).<br />
Over most of western Maryland, the upper half of the unit is thickly<br />
laminated shale containing nodules and thin beds of limestone.<br />
Similar shale without limestone makes up the lower portion of the<br />
Needmore Shale, grading at the base to dark fissile non-calcareous<br />
shale. In outcrop, the coarser shale and mudrock disintegrate rapidly<br />
to pale-olive or tan chips or irregular clasts, whereas the black shale<br />
weathers to thin grayish-white plates and papery flakes much like<br />
the Marcellus Shale (Glaser, 2004).<br />
DISCUSSION OF DEPTH AND THICKNESS RANGES<br />
Based on well log picks and published reports for Maryland,<br />
the thickness of the Needmore Shale ranges from 3 to 190 feet<br />
(Edwards, 1970; Nutter and others, 1980). The unit thickens from<br />
northwest to the southeast (Figure A13-1). Depth to the top of<br />
the Needmore varies from a minimum of about 1,000 feet below