MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...
MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...
MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
APPENDIX A: UPPER CAMBRIAN ROSE RUN SANDSTONE<br />
65<br />
flat to sabkha conditions. The carbonate bank represented by these<br />
formations dipped seaward toward southeastern Virginia (southeast<br />
of the <strong>MRCSP</strong> study area) where these units are dominated by peritidal<br />
carbonates (Haynes, 1991).<br />
Eau Claire/Conosauga/Elbrook/Warrior Formations—Marine conditions<br />
continued in the units capping the trough fill. The marine<br />
shales of the Eau Claire Formation in the western part of the <strong>MRCSP</strong><br />
study area represent the continuation of the Mt. Simon transgression<br />
(Driese and others, 1981). It bears repeating that this transgressive<br />
sequence is different from the transgressive sequence that includes<br />
the basal sands in the Rome trough and the basal sands east of the<br />
Rome trough. The Eau Claire and lateral units represent deposition<br />
following filling of the Rome trough. Across the <strong>MRCSP</strong> study area,<br />
there is a west to east transition in this sub-interval from shallow<br />
marine siliciclastics of the Eau Claire Formation; to mixed carbonates<br />
and clastics deposited in intra-shelf settings in the Conasauga;<br />
to peritidal carbonates of the Elbrook and Pleasant Hill Formations<br />
(Read, 1989a, 1989b). The latter carbonates are part of the persistent<br />
carbonate bank that existed on the eastern, passive margin of the<br />
craton during Cambrian and Early Ordovician time.<br />
Upper Munising/Trempealeau/Potosi/Davis/Copper Ridge/Gatesburg/Conococheague<br />
Formations—During this sub-interval, a<br />
regression caused progradation of peritidal carbonates across the<br />
entire <strong>MRCSP</strong> study area (Read, 1989a and 1989b). This regression<br />
may have been related to the cessation of extensional tectonics on<br />
the passive margin, and marks the Sauk II/Sauk III boundary (Glumac<br />
and Walker, 2000). The Copper Ridge and its equivalents were<br />
deposited in a variety of peritidal environments. To the east, the<br />
Conococheague was deposited as platform carbonates transitional<br />
to deeper basinal facies to the south and east (Demicco, 1985). Shallowing-upward<br />
cycles within the Conococheague record repeated<br />
facies successions from storm to subtidal algal reef to subtidal shoal<br />
to intertidal flat and, ultimately, to sabkha (Demicco, 1983). Sandstones<br />
in the lower part of the Concococheague and lateral equivalents<br />
may be related to detrital influx following the Sauk II/Sauk<br />
III sea-level fall (Marchefka and Glumac, 2002). More widespread<br />
sandstones in Michigan and parts of Indiana (Galesville and Ironton)<br />
were deposited as shallow marine shelf sands, which preceded<br />
the accumulation of peritidal carbonates in the Trempealeau Formation<br />
(Catacosinos and Daniels, 1991).<br />
SUITABILITY AS A CO 2<br />
INJECTION TARGET OR SEAL UNIT<br />
Given the variability in the geology across the region, it is not<br />
surprising that the mineralogy of lithologies within the Basal Sandstone<br />
to top of Copper Ridge Interval in the <strong>MRCSP</strong> study area is<br />
quite variable. Much of the sandstone in the interval is composed of<br />
reworked, multicycle quartz similar to the underlying mineralogy of<br />
the basal sandstone. There are also significant amounts of detrital<br />
and diagenetic feldspars, as well as a variety of detrital and authigenic<br />
clay minerals present in some units. Additionally, there are<br />
numerous portions of the section that contain significant amounts<br />
of glauconite. The varied mineralogy complicates analyses of the<br />
interval because geophysical log responses are, in many cases, not<br />
representative of the actual porosity of the rocks. Microporosity<br />
in shales, and the complex mixing of carbonate and siliciclastic<br />
lithologies, complicate geophysical log responses in some areas and<br />
in some parts of the interval. These minerals make the assessment<br />
of porosity and, especially, permeability problematic. Core analyses<br />
from this interval on the Ohio platform indicate low permeability in<br />
the interbedded clastics and carbonates -, suggesting good to excellent<br />
reservoir seal/confining characteristics.<br />
Although the overall interval is mapped as a seal, there are units<br />
within the interval (especially in the east) that are possibilities for<br />
sequestration. These units themselves are confined by thick sections<br />
of shales or carbonates that would act as a seal. In northeastern<br />
Ohio, where limited porosity and permeability have been encountered,<br />
injection wells have been completed in the sandstones of the<br />
Conasauga Group. However, total cumulative injection volumes for<br />
these units are low when compared to Mt. Simon injection sites. In<br />
addition, multiple stratigraphic units had to be utilized at these sites<br />
to obtain the necessary injectivity.<br />
Geophysical log responses of a few well-developed dolomitic<br />
sandstone units within the Conasauga Group of eastern Ohio suggest<br />
potentially good to excellent injection reservoirs. Site-specific<br />
evaluation, coring, and core analysis would be necessary before using<br />
these sandstones as an injection target. These are possible targets<br />
for <strong>Phase</strong> II studies.<br />
Another potential sequestration target would be sandstones in<br />
the Rome Formation. These arkosic, marine sandstones may be as<br />
much as 500 feet thick (averaging approximately 250 feet). Limited<br />
oil and gas well drilling has encountered permeabilities as high as<br />
177 md, with an average of 62 md, and with mean porosities of 12<br />
percent (Harris and others, 2004). Because these are not regionally<br />
extensive units, they were not a focus of <strong>Phase</strong> I research, but they<br />
could be examined as part of the continuing geologic characterization<br />
in <strong>Phase</strong> II. Opportunities for structural closure exist within the<br />
fault-bound Rome trough, although reservoir heterogeneity may<br />
be common (Harris and Baranoski, 1996). The overlying shales<br />
of the Conasauga Group would form the seal on these potential<br />
reservoirs.<br />
Thick zones of vugular porosity have also been encountered in<br />
a number of scattered wells within the Copper Ridge Dolomite.<br />
Vuggy dolostones were used at the DuPont WAD Fee well in Louisville,<br />
Kentucky (just west of the <strong>MRCSP</strong> study area) for the disposal<br />
of industrial waste fluids, after a well in the Mt. Simon Sandstone<br />
encountered “tight” sandstones at that horizon. The interval of<br />
vuggy dolostone is sealed above by dense dolostones of the Copper<br />
Ridge. Coring of the potential reservoir and seal units within the<br />
Copper Ridge would be required to further evaluate their sequestration<br />
potential in this and other parts of the <strong>MRCSP</strong> study area.<br />
Where this unit is deep enough to keep the CO 2 in miscible form,<br />
analysis appears warranted for use as an injection target, especially<br />
as a backup or secondary target for deeper Mt. Simon wells. These<br />
are also potential targets for <strong>Phase</strong> II studies.<br />
4. UPPER CAMBRIAN ROSE RUN SANDSTONE<br />
In Ohio and eastern Kentucky, the Cambrian-Ordovician Knox interval<br />
is subdivided, in ascending stratigraphic order, into the Copper<br />
Ridge Dolomite, Rose Run sandstone, and Beekmantown Dolomite.<br />
The Cambrian Rose Run sandstone is the only laterally persistent sandstone<br />
within the Knox Dolomite. This sandstone interval can be correlated<br />
in the subsurface from eastern Ohio, where it subcrops beneath<br />
the Knox unconformity (Figure A4-1), to eastern Kentucky, into western<br />
West Virginia (upper sandstone member of the Knox), Pennsylvania<br />
(Upper Sandy member of the Gatesburg Formation) (Figure 5), and<br />
extends into New York (partial equivalent of the Theresa Formation).