30.01.2015 Views

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

MRCSP Phase I Geologic Characterization Report - Midwest ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX A: LOWER SILURIAN MEDINA GROUP/“CLINTON” SANDSTONE<br />

87<br />

LITHOLOGY<br />

The Medina Group is composed of interbedded sandstones, siltstones,<br />

and shales, with some carbonates (Laughrey, 1984; Laughrey<br />

and Harper, 1986; McCormac and others, 1996). The sandstones of<br />

the Grimsby Formation are very fine- to medium-grained, monocrystalline,<br />

quartzose rocks, with subangular to subrounded grains,<br />

variable sorting, and thin, discontinuous, silty shale interbeds.<br />

These sandstones vary in color, from white to gray to red; hence,<br />

the reference to these units by drillers as “Red Clinton” and “White<br />

Clinton”, particularly in eastern Ohio (Figure A7-1). Cementing materials<br />

include secondary silica, evaporites, hematite, and carbonates<br />

(Piotrowski, 1981; McCormac and others, 1996). The Cabot Head<br />

Shale is a dark green to black, marine shale with thin, quartzose, siltstone<br />

and sandstone laminations that increase in number toward the<br />

top of the unit (Piotrowski, 1981; Laughrey, 1984). The Whirlpool<br />

Sandstone forms the basal unit of this sequence, and, in the greater<br />

part of the Appalachian basin, is composed of a white to light gray to<br />

red, fine- to very fine-grained quartzose sandstone that is moderately<br />

well sorted and has subangular to subrounded grains (Piotrowski,<br />

1981; Brett and others 1995; McCormac and others, 1996). This<br />

basal unit becomes dolomitic in localized areas within the northwestern<br />

part of the basin (i.e., the Manitoulin Dolomite) (Laughrey,<br />

1984; McCormac and others, 1996; Castle, 1998).<br />

DEPTH AND THICKNESS RANGES<br />

The Medina Group crops out at its type locality in New York; in<br />

central Pennsylvania, outcrops of the equivalent Tuscarora Sandstone<br />

are present. In the remainder of the Appalachian basin, however,<br />

the Medina and equivalent units remain in the subsurface. The<br />

depth to this reservoir ranges from less than 1,000 feet to 6,700 feet,<br />

with wells located offshore in central Lake Erie reporting depths of<br />

over 2,200 feet (McCormac and others, 1996).<br />

Figure A7-3 illustrates the structure of the Medina Group throughout<br />

the basin. Structure contours are given in subsea elevations using<br />

an interval of 500 feet. The structure on top of the Medina Group<br />

strikes northeast-southwest and dips toward the southeast at a rate of<br />

approximately 40 to 70 feet per mile, with more shallowly dipping<br />

strata toward the north and west. A low point (subsea elevation of<br />

-9,000 feet) exists in southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West<br />

Virginia. East of this point, toward the Appalachian structural front,<br />

the Medina Group dips steeply to the northwest at rates of 70 to<br />

about 180 feet per mile.<br />

Figure A7-4 illustrates the thickness of this sequence across the<br />

basin using a contour interval of 50 feet. Gross thicknesses range<br />

from 0 feet in the northwestern portion of the basin to more than<br />

700 feet in eastern West Virginia. These thicknesses are generally<br />

consistent with those previously published by McCormac and others<br />

(1996) and Laughrey and Harper (1986). The actual pay zones of the<br />

Medina Group (i.e., where reservoir porosity and permeability are<br />

favorable) comprise only a portion of these thicknesses, however.<br />

Pay zones range from 3 to 50 feet and average 23 feet in thickness<br />

(McCormac and others, 1996).<br />

The structure and thickness of the Medina Group and equivalent<br />

units, as presented in Figures A7-3 and A7-4, are consistent with<br />

the interpretation that during early Silurian time, an influx of siliciclastic<br />

material came from eroding Taconic highlands and an island<br />

arc located at the eastern edge of the Appalachian basin (i.e., central<br />

Pennsylvania and eastern West Virginia). These sediments were<br />

shed across the basin to create a clastic wedge that is thickest in the<br />

southeast and thins toward the northwest. The low area on the structure<br />

contour map (Figure A7-3) is indicative of the foreland basin<br />

that existed adjacent to the eroding highlands.<br />

DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS/<br />

PALEOGEOGRAPHY/TECTONISM<br />

The depositional history of the Medina Group dates back to the<br />

latter part of the Taconic orogeny in early Silurian time. During<br />

this period, clastic material eroded from both foreland fold-belt<br />

highlands adjacent to the eastern edge of the Appalachian basin<br />

and the plutonic igneous rocks of the island arc orogen (Laughrey,<br />

1984; Laughrey and Harper, 1986; McCormac and others, 1996).<br />

The directions of sediment transport from these highlands were<br />

both parallel (i.e., northeast-southwest) and perpendicular (i.e.,<br />

to the northwest) to the shoreline (Laughrey and Harper, 1986),<br />

which ran from northern Beaver County to central Warren County<br />

in Pennsylvania (Piotrowski, 1981). The Medina depositional<br />

system is that of a shelf/longshore-bar/tidal-flat/delta complex.<br />

The Whirlpool Sandstone is the basal transgressive unit of this<br />

system and is overlain by shelf muds and transitional silty sands<br />

of the Cabot Head Shale. These sediments were overlain by shoreface<br />

and nearshore sands of the lower Grimsby Sandstone, which<br />

grade into argillaceous sands at the top of this unit (Laughrey,<br />

1984; Laughrey and Harper, 1986; McCormac and others, 1996).<br />

Laughrey (1984) divided the Medina Group’s depositional system<br />

into five facies: 1) tidal flat, tidal creek, and lagoonal sediments;<br />

2) braided fluvial-channel sediments; 3) littoral deposits; 4) offshore<br />

bars; and 5) sublittoral sheet sands. Facies 1, 2, and 3 sediments<br />

comprise the Grimsby Sandstone, which was deposited in a complex<br />

deltaic to shallow marine environment. The deeper, offshore<br />

mud and sand bar deposits of Facies 4 were reworked by both storm<br />

and tidal currents to become transitional sandstones of the Cabot<br />

Head Shale. The Whirlpool Sandstone is included in Facies 5, which<br />

was formed in nearshore marine and fluvial, braided river environments<br />

in existence during the beginning of a marine transgression<br />

(Piotrowski, 1981; Laughrey, 1984; McCormac and others, 1996).<br />

STRUCTURE/TRAP TYPES<br />

Throughout the Appalachian basin, stratigraphic traps have been<br />

shown to control the occurrence of gas in the Medina Group, although<br />

in localized areas (e.g., Portage County, Ohio, and Mercer<br />

County, Pennsylvania), gas production may be enhanced by geologic<br />

structure (Piotrowski, 1981; Laughrey and Harper, 1986; McCormac<br />

and others, 1996). The overall heterogeneity of this reservoir is<br />

evidenced by the variety of mechanisms forming the stratigraphic<br />

traps, which include sandstone pinchouts, porosity changes, gaswater<br />

contacts, and diagenesis (Laughrey and Harper, 1986).<br />

SUITABILITY AS A CO 2<br />

INJECTION TARGET OR SEAL UNIT<br />

The <strong>MRCSP</strong> considers the Medina Group/ “Clinton” sandstone<br />

as a sequestration target (Figure 5), particularly for its prevalence<br />

throughout the Appalachian basin as a reliable oil-and-gas-producing<br />

reservoir (Figure A7-2), its sandstone lithologies, and the<br />

presence of less permeable confining rocks above and below the<br />

sequence. However, several factors, including the variability in<br />

lithology, the “tight” nature of this reservoir (with respect to both<br />

porosity and permeability), and discontinuity of sandstone lenses in<br />

the northwestern portion of the basin, may limit the overall success<br />

of the Medina Group as a CO 2 sequestration target.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!